{"title":"社会计算和道德规范的起源","authors":"I. Mikhailov","doi":"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-1-51-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author proposes a conception in which society and a person are understood as a nested computing system of a multi-agent architecture. The ‘Computational’ as a concept extends beyond the Turing machine and is considered as the ability to compute and predict statistical distributions that best match the characteristics of the external environment to achieve the optimal value of an assumed control variable. Society induces the rules of behavior in agents similarly to the way by which a magnetic field induces a current in a moving conductor. Induction is carried out by selecting the patterns of behavior empirically derived by individuals and certifying the patterns that are most useful for achieving the target indicators of the system. Certified rules are perceived by individuals as, on the one hand, immanent to them, and on the other, as generally allowing for their violation, since both individual agents and the whole society are statistical machines. The objective probability of non-compliance with a rule is perceived as moral freedom, and hormonal reinforcement of adherence to the general rule is perceived as a sense of moral duty. The computational approach to morality overcomes the inductivism of naturalistic and utilitarian theories, and at the same time scientifically explains the ‘transcendentality’ of moral law, without resorting to idealistic metaphysics, as does Kantian deontism.","PeriodicalId":41795,"journal":{"name":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social computations and the origin of moral norms\",\"authors\":\"I. Mikhailov\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-1-51-68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author proposes a conception in which society and a person are understood as a nested computing system of a multi-agent architecture. The ‘Computational’ as a concept extends beyond the Turing machine and is considered as the ability to compute and predict statistical distributions that best match the characteristics of the external environment to achieve the optimal value of an assumed control variable. Society induces the rules of behavior in agents similarly to the way by which a magnetic field induces a current in a moving conductor. Induction is carried out by selecting the patterns of behavior empirically derived by individuals and certifying the patterns that are most useful for achieving the target indicators of the system. Certified rules are perceived by individuals as, on the one hand, immanent to them, and on the other, as generally allowing for their violation, since both individual agents and the whole society are statistical machines. The objective probability of non-compliance with a rule is perceived as moral freedom, and hormonal reinforcement of adherence to the general rule is perceived as a sense of moral duty. The computational approach to morality overcomes the inductivism of naturalistic and utilitarian theories, and at the same time scientifically explains the ‘transcendentality’ of moral law, without resorting to idealistic metaphysics, as does Kantian deontism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-1-51-68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-1-51-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The author proposes a conception in which society and a person are understood as a nested computing system of a multi-agent architecture. The ‘Computational’ as a concept extends beyond the Turing machine and is considered as the ability to compute and predict statistical distributions that best match the characteristics of the external environment to achieve the optimal value of an assumed control variable. Society induces the rules of behavior in agents similarly to the way by which a magnetic field induces a current in a moving conductor. Induction is carried out by selecting the patterns of behavior empirically derived by individuals and certifying the patterns that are most useful for achieving the target indicators of the system. Certified rules are perceived by individuals as, on the one hand, immanent to them, and on the other, as generally allowing for their violation, since both individual agents and the whole society are statistical machines. The objective probability of non-compliance with a rule is perceived as moral freedom, and hormonal reinforcement of adherence to the general rule is perceived as a sense of moral duty. The computational approach to morality overcomes the inductivism of naturalistic and utilitarian theories, and at the same time scientifically explains the ‘transcendentality’ of moral law, without resorting to idealistic metaphysics, as does Kantian deontism.