欧洲人权法院关于同性伴侣结婚权利的判例法

Aleksa Radonjić
{"title":"欧洲人权法院关于同性伴侣结婚权利的判例法","authors":"Aleksa Radonjić","doi":"10.20901/pp.13.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ECtHR has established case law by which national authorities are obliged to ‎legally recognize and regulate same-sex partnerships. However, they are not‎ obliged to give the right to marry to same-sex partners taking into account‎ dominant moral beliefs in society. This paper aims to test such an approach‎ from the perspective of four theories of justice. The aim is to see if the consistent ‎application of precepts and principles of these theories of justice to this ‎case law makes such an approach of the ECtHR just from the viewpoint of any‎ of these theories of justice. This way what may seem as intuitively just or unjust‎ is tested against concrete and particular standards of justice.‎","PeriodicalId":34190,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Perspektive","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Court of Human Rights Caselaw on the Right of the Same-Sex Couples to Marry\",\"authors\":\"Aleksa Radonjić\",\"doi\":\"10.20901/pp.13.1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ECtHR has established case law by which national authorities are obliged to ‎legally recognize and regulate same-sex partnerships. However, they are not‎ obliged to give the right to marry to same-sex partners taking into account‎ dominant moral beliefs in society. This paper aims to test such an approach‎ from the perspective of four theories of justice. The aim is to see if the consistent ‎application of precepts and principles of these theories of justice to this ‎case law makes such an approach of the ECtHR just from the viewpoint of any‎ of these theories of justice. This way what may seem as intuitively just or unjust‎ is tested against concrete and particular standards of justice.‎\",\"PeriodicalId\":34190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politicke Perspektive\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politicke Perspektive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20901/pp.13.1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Perspektive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20901/pp.13.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲人权法院建立了判例法,国家当局有义务在法律上承认和规范同性伴侣关系。然而,考虑到社会上占主导地位的道德信仰,他们没有义务给予同性伴侣结婚的权利。本文旨在从四种正义理论的角度对这一方法进行检验。目的是要看看这些正义理论的规则和原则对判例法的一致应用是否使欧洲人权法院的这种方法只是从这些正义理论的任何观点来看。这样,直觉上看似公正或不公正的东西就可以用具体的和特定的正义标准来检验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European Court of Human Rights Caselaw on the Right of the Same-Sex Couples to Marry
ECtHR has established case law by which national authorities are obliged to ‎legally recognize and regulate same-sex partnerships. However, they are not‎ obliged to give the right to marry to same-sex partners taking into account‎ dominant moral beliefs in society. This paper aims to test such an approach‎ from the perspective of four theories of justice. The aim is to see if the consistent ‎application of precepts and principles of these theories of justice to this ‎case law makes such an approach of the ECtHR just from the viewpoint of any‎ of these theories of justice. This way what may seem as intuitively just or unjust‎ is tested against concrete and particular standards of justice.‎
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信