面向新常态的政策与社会优势——以印尼应对新冠肺炎疫情为例

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Ghazali, T. M. Djafar, Sity Daud
{"title":"面向新常态的政策与社会优势——以印尼应对新冠肺炎疫情为例","authors":"R. Ghazali, T. M. Djafar, Sity Daud","doi":"10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/V17I01/71-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly negative impacts on people’s lives and has challenged national leadership to take necessary measures to solve it. The Indonesian government has been confronted with issues such as health services, case detection, the financial capacity of the state, and the decline of economic activity. This study aimed to examine the policies and social advantages of “the new normal” as a case study of handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This was a qualitative study using primary and secondary data. The study showed that the government’s responses were ineffective and insufficient for preparing contingency measures. Poor coordination between central and regional governments has also been observed as a public concern. The central government decided to implement a large-scale social distancing policy instead of imposing a total lockdown due to its massive financial burden on the government. While making the policies, the central government was concerned more with political and economic considerations and prohibited regional governments from imposing local lockdown policies, unless permitted by the central government. This situation allegedly resulted in substandard protection of the people from the pandemic. The central government’s budgeting policy also failed to put more emphasis on the public health services because the budget for the health sector was lower than the budget for economic recovery and social assistance. However, notwithstanding the government’s unproductive policies in handling the pandemic, Indonesian people have mutual assistance culture as a social advantage. Through such social capital, people were driven to help each other, especially regarding social and economic assistance to the affected people. Contrarily, mutual awareness may have driven people to refrain from doing activities in public areas and to stay at home to stop the spread of COVID-19. It boosted the social endurance of the people in dealing with the pandemic toward a new normal.","PeriodicalId":38263,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Diversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policies and Social Advantages toward a New Normal: A Case Study of Handling the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"R. Ghazali, T. M. Djafar, Sity Daud\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/V17I01/71-87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly negative impacts on people’s lives and has challenged national leadership to take necessary measures to solve it. The Indonesian government has been confronted with issues such as health services, case detection, the financial capacity of the state, and the decline of economic activity. This study aimed to examine the policies and social advantages of “the new normal” as a case study of handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This was a qualitative study using primary and secondary data. The study showed that the government’s responses were ineffective and insufficient for preparing contingency measures. Poor coordination between central and regional governments has also been observed as a public concern. The central government decided to implement a large-scale social distancing policy instead of imposing a total lockdown due to its massive financial burden on the government. While making the policies, the central government was concerned more with political and economic considerations and prohibited regional governments from imposing local lockdown policies, unless permitted by the central government. This situation allegedly resulted in substandard protection of the people from the pandemic. The central government’s budgeting policy also failed to put more emphasis on the public health services because the budget for the health sector was lower than the budget for economic recovery and social assistance. However, notwithstanding the government’s unproductive policies in handling the pandemic, Indonesian people have mutual assistance culture as a social advantage. Through such social capital, people were driven to help each other, especially regarding social and economic assistance to the affected people. Contrarily, mutual awareness may have driven people to refrain from doing activities in public areas and to stay at home to stop the spread of COVID-19. It boosted the social endurance of the people in dealing with the pandemic toward a new normal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Organizational Diversity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Organizational Diversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/V17I01/71-87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/V17I01/71-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情给人民生活带来深刻负面影响,要求各国领导人采取必要措施予以应对。印尼政府一直面临着诸如卫生服务、病例发现、国家财政能力和经济活动下降等问题。本研究旨在以印尼应对新冠肺炎疫情为例,探讨“新常态”的政策和社会优势。这是一项使用第一手资料和第二手资料的定性研究。研究表明,政府的应对措施效率低下,不足以准备应急措施。中央政府和地方政府之间的协调不力也引起了公众的关注。中央政府考虑到巨大的财政负担,决定实施大规模的保持社会距离政策,而不是全面封锁。在制定政策时,中央政府更多地考虑政治和经济因素,禁止地方政府在没有得到中央政府许可的情况下实施地方封锁政策。据称,这种情况导致对人民的保护不达标。中央政府的预算政策也未能更加重视公共卫生服务,因为卫生部门的预算低于经济复苏和社会援助的预算。然而,尽管政府在应对大流行病方面的政策没有成效,但印度尼西亚人民具有互助文化作为一种社会优势。通过这种社会资本,人们相互帮助,特别是在对受灾人民的社会和经济援助方面。相反,相互意识可能促使人们避免在公共场所活动,并留在家中以阻止COVID-19的传播。增强了人民群众抗疫新常态的社会承受力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policies and Social Advantages toward a New Normal: A Case Study of Handling the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly negative impacts on people’s lives and has challenged national leadership to take necessary measures to solve it. The Indonesian government has been confronted with issues such as health services, case detection, the financial capacity of the state, and the decline of economic activity. This study aimed to examine the policies and social advantages of “the new normal” as a case study of handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This was a qualitative study using primary and secondary data. The study showed that the government’s responses were ineffective and insufficient for preparing contingency measures. Poor coordination between central and regional governments has also been observed as a public concern. The central government decided to implement a large-scale social distancing policy instead of imposing a total lockdown due to its massive financial burden on the government. While making the policies, the central government was concerned more with political and economic considerations and prohibited regional governments from imposing local lockdown policies, unless permitted by the central government. This situation allegedly resulted in substandard protection of the people from the pandemic. The central government’s budgeting policy also failed to put more emphasis on the public health services because the budget for the health sector was lower than the budget for economic recovery and social assistance. However, notwithstanding the government’s unproductive policies in handling the pandemic, Indonesian people have mutual assistance culture as a social advantage. Through such social capital, people were driven to help each other, especially regarding social and economic assistance to the affected people. Contrarily, mutual awareness may have driven people to refrain from doing activities in public areas and to stay at home to stop the spread of COVID-19. It boosted the social endurance of the people in dealing with the pandemic toward a new normal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Organizational Diversity
International Journal of Organizational Diversity Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信