有和没有语音和言语训练的个人使用的重点资源

M. A. D. M. Borrego, Mara Behlau
{"title":"有和没有语音和言语训练的个人使用的重点资源","authors":"M. A. D. M. Borrego, Mara Behlau","doi":"10.1590/S1516-80342012000200019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To investigate how individuals with and without voice training use emphatic accent in two previously selected words during a reading. METHODS:Seventy seven individuals with ages between 19 and 57 years were distributed into two groups: 51 students from a radio training course - TG (trained group); and 26 subjects with no voice and speech training - UnTG (untrained group). Individuals read a radio report twice, emphasizing two different words in each reading: \"negotiates\" and \"reforms\". The readings were recorded with an interval of two months between them, which corresponded to the beginning and end of the radio training course attended by the TG. Voice samples were submitted to: auditory-perceptual analysis of the occurrence, evaluation and use of emphasis; visual analysis of the spectrographic trace for delimitation of the pauses; acoustic analysis of the duration and fundamental frequency of the emphases. Results were submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The TG had higher grades than the UnTG regarding the quality of emphasis use, and there was no difference in its occurrence and use. The word \"reforms\" had higher occurrence of emphasis and was better evaluated than the word \"negotiates\". The TG used less pauses than the UnTG. Acoustic analysis showed that the word \"reforms\" was longer than \"negotiates\" in the UnTG. The mean fundamental frequency was higher for \"negotiates\". CONCLUSION: Both groups demonstrated that the use of emphasis accompanies the individuality of speakers. The TG had better ability in the distribution of pauses. The words were distinctly emphasized due to syntactic and semantic aspects.","PeriodicalId":21204,"journal":{"name":"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia","volume":"17 1","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recursos de ênfase utilizados por indivíduos com e sem treinamento de voz e fala\",\"authors\":\"M. A. D. M. Borrego, Mara Behlau\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1516-80342012000200019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: To investigate how individuals with and without voice training use emphatic accent in two previously selected words during a reading. METHODS:Seventy seven individuals with ages between 19 and 57 years were distributed into two groups: 51 students from a radio training course - TG (trained group); and 26 subjects with no voice and speech training - UnTG (untrained group). Individuals read a radio report twice, emphasizing two different words in each reading: \\\"negotiates\\\" and \\\"reforms\\\". The readings were recorded with an interval of two months between them, which corresponded to the beginning and end of the radio training course attended by the TG. Voice samples were submitted to: auditory-perceptual analysis of the occurrence, evaluation and use of emphasis; visual analysis of the spectrographic trace for delimitation of the pauses; acoustic analysis of the duration and fundamental frequency of the emphases. Results were submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The TG had higher grades than the UnTG regarding the quality of emphasis use, and there was no difference in its occurrence and use. The word \\\"reforms\\\" had higher occurrence of emphasis and was better evaluated than the word \\\"negotiates\\\". The TG used less pauses than the UnTG. Acoustic analysis showed that the word \\\"reforms\\\" was longer than \\\"negotiates\\\" in the UnTG. The mean fundamental frequency was higher for \\\"negotiates\\\". CONCLUSION: Both groups demonstrated that the use of emphasis accompanies the individuality of speakers. The TG had better ability in the distribution of pauses. The words were distinctly emphasized due to syntactic and semantic aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"216-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000200019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000200019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

目的:研究在阅读过程中,受过和没有受过语音训练的人如何在两个先前选择的单词中使用重音。方法:77名年龄在19 ~ 57岁之间的人被分为两组:51名来自无线电培训课程TG(训练组)的学生;26名受试者未接受语音和言语训练,简称UnTG(未接受训练组)。每个人读两遍广播报道,每次都强调两个不同的词:“谈判”和“改革”。每隔两个月记录一次读数,这与总干事参加的无线电训练课程的开始和结束时间相一致。语音样本提交:听觉感知分析发生、评价和使用的重点;用光谱迹线的视觉分析来划分停顿;声学分析的持续时间和基频的重点。结果提交统计分析。结果:TG在强调使用质量方面的评分高于UnTG,其发生和使用没有差异。“改革”一词比“谈判”一词更受重视,评价也更好。TG比UnTG使用更少的停顿。声学分析表明,在联合国过渡政府中,“改革”一词比“谈判”一词长。“谈判者”的平均基本频率更高。结论:两组研究都表明,强调的使用伴随着说话人的个性。TG对停顿的分布能力较好。由于句法和语义方面的原因,这些词被明显强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recursos de ênfase utilizados por indivíduos com e sem treinamento de voz e fala
PURPOSE: To investigate how individuals with and without voice training use emphatic accent in two previously selected words during a reading. METHODS:Seventy seven individuals with ages between 19 and 57 years were distributed into two groups: 51 students from a radio training course - TG (trained group); and 26 subjects with no voice and speech training - UnTG (untrained group). Individuals read a radio report twice, emphasizing two different words in each reading: "negotiates" and "reforms". The readings were recorded with an interval of two months between them, which corresponded to the beginning and end of the radio training course attended by the TG. Voice samples were submitted to: auditory-perceptual analysis of the occurrence, evaluation and use of emphasis; visual analysis of the spectrographic trace for delimitation of the pauses; acoustic analysis of the duration and fundamental frequency of the emphases. Results were submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The TG had higher grades than the UnTG regarding the quality of emphasis use, and there was no difference in its occurrence and use. The word "reforms" had higher occurrence of emphasis and was better evaluated than the word "negotiates". The TG used less pauses than the UnTG. Acoustic analysis showed that the word "reforms" was longer than "negotiates" in the UnTG. The mean fundamental frequency was higher for "negotiates". CONCLUSION: Both groups demonstrated that the use of emphasis accompanies the individuality of speakers. The TG had better ability in the distribution of pauses. The words were distinctly emphasized due to syntactic and semantic aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信