“Yo no saber si amaba mas al puente o al rio”:torcoes onto认识论em jose maria Arguedas /“I don ' t Know I If I Loved More the Bridge or the River”:onto认识论扭曲on jose maria Arguedas
{"title":"“Yo no saber si amaba mas al puente o al rio”:torcoes onto认识论em jose maria Arguedas /“I don ' t Know I If I Loved More the Bridge or the River”:onto认识论扭曲on jose maria Arguedas","authors":"Chryslen Mayra Barbosa Gonçalves","doi":"10.17851/2238-3824.25.1.45-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumo: A proposta aqui apresentada e proveniente de algumas tensoes possibilitadas pela leitura de Jose Maria Arguedas, aos 50 anos de sua morte, a partir dos debates de autores da “virada ontologica” e do “giro epistemologico” na producao do conhecimento antropologico. Neste sentido, retomo o livro Los R ios Profundos (1958) de Arguedas e coloco em dialogo com preocupacoes acerca dos Earth Beings. Tomo, tambem, a metafora do Pachachaca de Romulo Monte Alto (2011) e as inquietacoes epistemologicas, portanto politicas, da teoria critica anticolonial latino-americana, em especial a categoria ch’ixi de Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Meu objetivo, deste modo, e evidenciar as ressonâncias entre as preocupacoes ontoepistemologicas (DE LA CADENA, 2015) da antropologia com a producao de uma narrativa literaria arguediana. Palavras-chave: antropologia; ontoepistemologias; literatura; Jose Maria Arguedas. Abstract: The proposal presented here stems from some tensions made possible by the reading of Jose Maria Arguedas at the 50 years of his death, from the debates of authors of the “ontological turn” and the “epistemological turn” in the production of anthropological knowledge. In this sense, I return to the book Los Rios Profundos (1958) by Arguedas and put in dialogue with concerns about Earth Beings. I also take the metaphor of Romulo Monte Alto’s Pachachaca (2011) and the epistemological, therefore political, concerns of Latin American anticolonial critical theory, in particular Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s ch’ixi category. My goal, therefore, is to highlight the resonances between anthropology’s on-epistemological concerns (DE LA CADENA, 2015) with the production of an arguedian literary narrative. Keywords: anthropology; ontoepistemologies; literature; Jose Maria Arguedas.","PeriodicalId":40506,"journal":{"name":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","volume":"25 1","pages":"45-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Yo no sabía si amaba más al puente o al río”: torções ontoepistemológicas em José María Arguedas / “I Didn’t Know If I Loved More the Bridge or the River”: Ontoepistemological Twists on José María Arguedas\",\"authors\":\"Chryslen Mayra Barbosa Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.17851/2238-3824.25.1.45-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resumo: A proposta aqui apresentada e proveniente de algumas tensoes possibilitadas pela leitura de Jose Maria Arguedas, aos 50 anos de sua morte, a partir dos debates de autores da “virada ontologica” e do “giro epistemologico” na producao do conhecimento antropologico. Neste sentido, retomo o livro Los R ios Profundos (1958) de Arguedas e coloco em dialogo com preocupacoes acerca dos Earth Beings. Tomo, tambem, a metafora do Pachachaca de Romulo Monte Alto (2011) e as inquietacoes epistemologicas, portanto politicas, da teoria critica anticolonial latino-americana, em especial a categoria ch’ixi de Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Meu objetivo, deste modo, e evidenciar as ressonâncias entre as preocupacoes ontoepistemologicas (DE LA CADENA, 2015) da antropologia com a producao de uma narrativa literaria arguediana. Palavras-chave: antropologia; ontoepistemologias; literatura; Jose Maria Arguedas. Abstract: The proposal presented here stems from some tensions made possible by the reading of Jose Maria Arguedas at the 50 years of his death, from the debates of authors of the “ontological turn” and the “epistemological turn” in the production of anthropological knowledge. In this sense, I return to the book Los Rios Profundos (1958) by Arguedas and put in dialogue with concerns about Earth Beings. I also take the metaphor of Romulo Monte Alto’s Pachachaca (2011) and the epistemological, therefore political, concerns of Latin American anticolonial critical theory, in particular Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s ch’ixi category. My goal, therefore, is to highlight the resonances between anthropology’s on-epistemological concerns (DE LA CADENA, 2015) with the production of an arguedian literary narrative. Keywords: anthropology; ontoepistemologies; literature; Jose Maria Arguedas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"45-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.25.1.45-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.25.1.45-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文所提出的建议,是由于在Jose Maria Arguedas去世50周年之际,从人类学知识生产中的“本体论转向”和“认识论转向”两位作者的辩论中,阅读了他的作品所带来的一些紧张局势而提出的。在这个意义上,我回到了阿格达斯的《Los R ios profundo》(1958)一书,并与对地球存在的担忧进行了对话。我还使用了罗穆罗·蒙特·阿尔托(2011)的帕查卡元fora和拉丁美洲反殖民批评理论的认识论和政治关注,特别是西尔维亚·里维拉·库西坎基的ch ' ixi范畴。因此,我的目标是强调人类学的本体论关注(DE LA CADENA, 2015)与arguedian文学叙事的产生之间的共鸣。关键词:人类学;ontoepistemologias;文学;Jose Maria Arguedas。摘要:本文所提出的建议源于阅读Jose Maria Arguedas在他去世50周年时所产生的一些紧张关系,源于人类学知识生产中“本体论转变”和“认识论转变”作者的辩论。在这个意义上,我回到了阿格达斯的《Los Rios深水》(1958)一书,并与有关地球存在的问题进行了对话。我也带的metaphor Romulo高山’s Pachachaca(2011)和《epistemological因此经历了拉丁美洲的政治,关注关键理论,特别是西尔维亚·里维拉Cusicanqui’s ch’ixi类别。因此,我的目标是强调人类学在认识论上的关注(DE LA CADENA, 2015)与辩论性文学叙事的产生之间的联系。关键词:人类学;ontoepistemologies;文学;Jose Maria Arguedas。
“Yo no sabía si amaba más al puente o al río”: torções ontoepistemológicas em José María Arguedas / “I Didn’t Know If I Loved More the Bridge or the River”: Ontoepistemological Twists on José María Arguedas
Resumo: A proposta aqui apresentada e proveniente de algumas tensoes possibilitadas pela leitura de Jose Maria Arguedas, aos 50 anos de sua morte, a partir dos debates de autores da “virada ontologica” e do “giro epistemologico” na producao do conhecimento antropologico. Neste sentido, retomo o livro Los R ios Profundos (1958) de Arguedas e coloco em dialogo com preocupacoes acerca dos Earth Beings. Tomo, tambem, a metafora do Pachachaca de Romulo Monte Alto (2011) e as inquietacoes epistemologicas, portanto politicas, da teoria critica anticolonial latino-americana, em especial a categoria ch’ixi de Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Meu objetivo, deste modo, e evidenciar as ressonâncias entre as preocupacoes ontoepistemologicas (DE LA CADENA, 2015) da antropologia com a producao de uma narrativa literaria arguediana. Palavras-chave: antropologia; ontoepistemologias; literatura; Jose Maria Arguedas. Abstract: The proposal presented here stems from some tensions made possible by the reading of Jose Maria Arguedas at the 50 years of his death, from the debates of authors of the “ontological turn” and the “epistemological turn” in the production of anthropological knowledge. In this sense, I return to the book Los Rios Profundos (1958) by Arguedas and put in dialogue with concerns about Earth Beings. I also take the metaphor of Romulo Monte Alto’s Pachachaca (2011) and the epistemological, therefore political, concerns of Latin American anticolonial critical theory, in particular Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s ch’ixi category. My goal, therefore, is to highlight the resonances between anthropology’s on-epistemological concerns (DE LA CADENA, 2015) with the production of an arguedian literary narrative. Keywords: anthropology; ontoepistemologies; literature; Jose Maria Arguedas.