分布式重访:连贯科学学习记忆的分析方法。

IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vanessa Svihla, M. Wester, M. Linn
{"title":"分布式重访:连贯科学学习记忆的分析方法。","authors":"Vanessa Svihla, M. Wester, M. Linn","doi":"10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designing learning experiences that support the development of coherent understanding of complex scientific phenomena is challenging. We sought to identify analytics that can guide such designs to also support retention of coherent understanding. Based on prior research that distributing study of material over time supports retention, we explored revisiting previously studied material as an analytic. We tested ways to operationalize revisiting: as a general propensity to revisit previously studied material; as a propensity to revisit specific curricular steps; as a general propensity to distribute study by revisiting previously studied material on different days; and as a propensity to distribute study by revisiting specific steps on different days. The specific steps identified as central to the learning design included a static illustration and a dynamic visualization. We modeled revisiting in a sample of 664 students taught by 7 different teachers using a Web-based Inquiry Science Environment unit. Analysis of log files and regression modeling revealed that a general propensity to revisit did not predict retention. Revisiting the dynamic visualization better supported retention than revisiting static material, but only for distributed revisiting. Our findings suggest that revisiting can be a useful analytic when aligned to the framework guiding learning design.","PeriodicalId":36754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Analytics","volume":"2 1","pages":"75-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Revisiting: An Analytic for Retention of Coherent Science Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Svihla, M. Wester, M. Linn\",\"doi\":\"10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Designing learning experiences that support the development of coherent understanding of complex scientific phenomena is challenging. We sought to identify analytics that can guide such designs to also support retention of coherent understanding. Based on prior research that distributing study of material over time supports retention, we explored revisiting previously studied material as an analytic. We tested ways to operationalize revisiting: as a general propensity to revisit previously studied material; as a propensity to revisit specific curricular steps; as a general propensity to distribute study by revisiting previously studied material on different days; and as a propensity to distribute study by revisiting specific steps on different days. The specific steps identified as central to the learning design included a static illustration and a dynamic visualization. We modeled revisiting in a sample of 664 students taught by 7 different teachers using a Web-based Inquiry Science Environment unit. Analysis of log files and regression modeling revealed that a general propensity to revisit did not predict retention. Revisiting the dynamic visualization better supported retention than revisiting static material, but only for distributed revisiting. Our findings suggest that revisiting can be a useful analytic when aligned to the framework guiding learning design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Learning Analytics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"75-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Learning Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2015.22.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

设计学习体验来支持对复杂科学现象的连贯理解是具有挑战性的。我们试图确定能够指导这种设计的分析方法,以支持连贯理解的保留。基于先前的研究表明,随着时间的推移分配学习材料有助于记忆,我们探索了将以前学习的材料作为一种分析来重新学习。我们测试了重新审视的方法:作为重新审视以前学习过的材料的一般倾向;作为一种倾向,重新审视具体的课程步骤;通过在不同的日子重温以前学习过的材料来分配学习的一般倾向;并且倾向于通过在不同的日子里重温特定的步骤来分配学习。作为学习设计中心的具体步骤包括静态插图和动态可视化。我们以664名学生为样本,使用基于网络的探究科学环境单元,由7位不同的老师教授。对日志文件的分析和回归模型显示,重新访问的一般倾向并不能预测用户留存。重访动态可视化比重访静态材料更好地支持记忆,但仅适用于分布式重访。我们的研究结果表明,当与指导学习设计的框架保持一致时,重访可以是一个有用的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributed Revisiting: An Analytic for Retention of Coherent Science Learning.
Designing learning experiences that support the development of coherent understanding of complex scientific phenomena is challenging. We sought to identify analytics that can guide such designs to also support retention of coherent understanding. Based on prior research that distributing study of material over time supports retention, we explored revisiting previously studied material as an analytic. We tested ways to operationalize revisiting: as a general propensity to revisit previously studied material; as a propensity to revisit specific curricular steps; as a general propensity to distribute study by revisiting previously studied material on different days; and as a propensity to distribute study by revisiting specific steps on different days. The specific steps identified as central to the learning design included a static illustration and a dynamic visualization. We modeled revisiting in a sample of 664 students taught by 7 different teachers using a Web-based Inquiry Science Environment unit. Analysis of log files and regression modeling revealed that a general propensity to revisit did not predict retention. Revisiting the dynamic visualization better supported retention than revisiting static material, but only for distributed revisiting. Our findings suggest that revisiting can be a useful analytic when aligned to the framework guiding learning design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Learning Analytics
Journal of Learning Analytics Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信