学习l5e框架对认知学习结果和反应速率主题概念理解的影响

F. Santoso
{"title":"学习l5e框架对认知学习结果和反应速率主题概念理解的影响","authors":"F. Santoso","doi":"10.17977/JPS.V8I3.14080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in student learning outcomes between learning using scaffolding and none. It also to find whether there were differences in Science Process Skills of students between learning to use scaffolding and none. The research subjects were 72 students of XI_A_ 1 and XI_A_3. It was found that (1) There are differences in HBK between both classes The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (86) than others (79); and (2) There are differences in KPS between both classes. The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (83.3) compared to others (78.5). Abstrak : Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Ini juga untuk menemukan apakah ada perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Subjek penelitian adalah 72 siswa XI_A_ 1 dan XI_A_3. Ditemukan bahwa, (1) Ada perbedaan dalam HBK antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (86) daripada yang lain (79); dan (2) Ada perbedaan dalam KPS antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (83,3) dibandingkan dengan yang lain (78,5)","PeriodicalId":30690,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Sains","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Learning Lc 5e Scaffolding on Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Conceptual understanding on Reaction Rate Topic\",\"authors\":\"F. Santoso\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/JPS.V8I3.14080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in student learning outcomes between learning using scaffolding and none. It also to find whether there were differences in Science Process Skills of students between learning to use scaffolding and none. The research subjects were 72 students of XI_A_ 1 and XI_A_3. It was found that (1) There are differences in HBK between both classes The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (86) than others (79); and (2) There are differences in KPS between both classes. The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (83.3) compared to others (78.5). Abstrak : Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Ini juga untuk menemukan apakah ada perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Subjek penelitian adalah 72 siswa XI_A_ 1 dan XI_A_3. Ditemukan bahwa, (1) Ada perbedaan dalam HBK antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (86) daripada yang lain (79); dan (2) Ada perbedaan dalam KPS antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (83,3) dibandingkan dengan yang lain (78,5)\",\"PeriodicalId\":30690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Sains\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Sains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/JPS.V8I3.14080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/JPS.V8I3.14080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是确定使用支架学习和不使用支架学习之间的学生学习结果是否存在差异。研究还发现,学习使用脚手架和不学习脚手架的学生在科学过程技能方面是否存在差异。研究对象为72名XI_A_1和XI_A_3学生。研究发现:(1)两个班的HBK存在差异。实验班的学习成绩(86)高于其他班(79);(2)两类之间的KPS存在差异。实验班的学习成绩(83.3)高于其他班(78.5)。这也是为了了解学生在学习使用设计师和没有设计师的科学过程中的技能是否存在差异。研究对象为72名学生XI_A_1和XI_A_3。结果发现:(1)两个班的HBK存在差异。实验的学习效果(86)高于其他实验(79);以及(2)两个类别之间的KPS存在差异。实验的学习效果(83.3)高于其他实验(78.5)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Learning Lc 5e Scaffolding on Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Conceptual understanding on Reaction Rate Topic
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in student learning outcomes between learning using scaffolding and none. It also to find whether there were differences in Science Process Skills of students between learning to use scaffolding and none. The research subjects were 72 students of XI_A_ 1 and XI_A_3. It was found that (1) There are differences in HBK between both classes The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (86) than others (79); and (2) There are differences in KPS between both classes. The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (83.3) compared to others (78.5). Abstrak : Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Ini juga untuk menemukan apakah ada perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Subjek penelitian adalah 72 siswa XI_A_ 1 dan XI_A_3. Ditemukan bahwa, (1) Ada perbedaan dalam HBK antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (86) daripada yang lain (79); dan (2) Ada perbedaan dalam KPS antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (83,3) dibandingkan dengan yang lain (78,5)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信