Ana Poblacion PhD, MSc , Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba PhD, MPH , Deborah A. Frank MD , Georgiana Esteves MPH , Lindsey J. Rateau MPH , Timothy C. Heeren PhD , Sharon Coleman MSPT, MPH , Maureen M. Black PhD , Diana B. Cutts MD , Félice Lê-Scherban PhD, MPH , Eduardo R. Ochoa Jr. MD, FAAP , Megan Sandel MD, MPH , Richard Sheward MPP , John Cook PhD, MAEd
{"title":"美国用于临床和研究的儿童和成人食品安全量表的开发和验证","authors":"Ana Poblacion PhD, MSc , Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba PhD, MPH , Deborah A. Frank MD , Georgiana Esteves MPH , Lindsey J. Rateau MPH , Timothy C. Heeren PhD , Sharon Coleman MSPT, MPH , Maureen M. Black PhD , Diana B. Cutts MD , Félice Lê-Scherban PhD, MPH , Eduardo R. Ochoa Jr. MD, FAAP , Megan Sandel MD, MPH , Richard Sheward MPP , John Cook PhD, MAEd","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food insecurity (FI) prevalence was consistently >10% over the past 20 years, indicating chronic economic hardship. Recession periods exacerbate already high prevalence of FI, reflecting acute economic hardship. To monitor FI and respond quickly to changes in prevalence, an abbreviated food security scale measuring presence and severity of household FI in adults and children is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our aim was to develop an abbreviated, sensitive, specific, and valid food security scale to identify severity levels of FI in households with children.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional and longitudinal survey data were analyzed for years 1998 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Participants/setting</h3><p>Participants were racially diverse primary caregivers of 69,040 index children younger than 4 years accessing health care in 5 US cities.</p></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses performed</h3><p>Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and area under the receiver operator curve were used to test combinations of questions for the most effective abbreviated scale to assess levels of severity of adult and child FI compared with the Household Food Security Survey Module. Adjusted logistic regression models assessed convergent validity between the Abbreviated Child and Adult Food Security Scale (ACAFSS) and health measures. McNemar tests examined the ACAFSS performance in times of acute economic hardship.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ACAFSS exhibited 91.2% sensitivity; 99.6% specificity; 98.3% and 97.6% positive and negative predictive values, respectively; 97.7% accuracy; and a 99.6% area under the receiver operator curve, while showing high convergent validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ACAFSS is highly sensitive, specific, and valid for detecting severity levels of FI among racially diverse households with children. The ACAFSS is recommended as a stand-alone scale or a follow-up scale after households with children screen positive for FI risk. The ACAFSS is also recommended for planning interventions and evaluating their effects not only on the binary categories of food security and FI, but also on changes in levels of severity, especially when rapid decision making is crucial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"123 10","pages":"Pages S89-S102.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of an Abbreviated Child and Adult Food Security Scale for Use in Clinical and Research Settings in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Ana Poblacion PhD, MSc , Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba PhD, MPH , Deborah A. Frank MD , Georgiana Esteves MPH , Lindsey J. Rateau MPH , Timothy C. Heeren PhD , Sharon Coleman MSPT, MPH , Maureen M. Black PhD , Diana B. Cutts MD , Félice Lê-Scherban PhD, MPH , Eduardo R. Ochoa Jr. MD, FAAP , Megan Sandel MD, MPH , Richard Sheward MPP , John Cook PhD, MAEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jand.2023.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food insecurity (FI) prevalence was consistently >10% over the past 20 years, indicating chronic economic hardship. Recession periods exacerbate already high prevalence of FI, reflecting acute economic hardship. To monitor FI and respond quickly to changes in prevalence, an abbreviated food security scale measuring presence and severity of household FI in adults and children is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our aim was to develop an abbreviated, sensitive, specific, and valid food security scale to identify severity levels of FI in households with children.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional and longitudinal survey data were analyzed for years 1998 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Participants/setting</h3><p>Participants were racially diverse primary caregivers of 69,040 index children younger than 4 years accessing health care in 5 US cities.</p></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses performed</h3><p>Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and area under the receiver operator curve were used to test combinations of questions for the most effective abbreviated scale to assess levels of severity of adult and child FI compared with the Household Food Security Survey Module. Adjusted logistic regression models assessed convergent validity between the Abbreviated Child and Adult Food Security Scale (ACAFSS) and health measures. McNemar tests examined the ACAFSS performance in times of acute economic hardship.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ACAFSS exhibited 91.2% sensitivity; 99.6% specificity; 98.3% and 97.6% positive and negative predictive values, respectively; 97.7% accuracy; and a 99.6% area under the receiver operator curve, while showing high convergent validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ACAFSS is highly sensitive, specific, and valid for detecting severity levels of FI among racially diverse households with children. The ACAFSS is recommended as a stand-alone scale or a follow-up scale after households with children screen positive for FI risk. The ACAFSS is also recommended for planning interventions and evaluating their effects not only on the binary categories of food security and FI, but also on changes in levels of severity, especially when rapid decision making is crucial.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"123 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages S89-S102.e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267223000618\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267223000618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of an Abbreviated Child and Adult Food Security Scale for Use in Clinical and Research Settings in the United States
Background
Food insecurity (FI) prevalence was consistently >10% over the past 20 years, indicating chronic economic hardship. Recession periods exacerbate already high prevalence of FI, reflecting acute economic hardship. To monitor FI and respond quickly to changes in prevalence, an abbreviated food security scale measuring presence and severity of household FI in adults and children is needed.
Objective
Our aim was to develop an abbreviated, sensitive, specific, and valid food security scale to identify severity levels of FI in households with children.
Design
Cross-sectional and longitudinal survey data were analyzed for years 1998 to 2022.
Participants/setting
Participants were racially diverse primary caregivers of 69,040 index children younger than 4 years accessing health care in 5 US cities.
Statistical analyses performed
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and area under the receiver operator curve were used to test combinations of questions for the most effective abbreviated scale to assess levels of severity of adult and child FI compared with the Household Food Security Survey Module. Adjusted logistic regression models assessed convergent validity between the Abbreviated Child and Adult Food Security Scale (ACAFSS) and health measures. McNemar tests examined the ACAFSS performance in times of acute economic hardship.
Results
The ACAFSS exhibited 91.2% sensitivity; 99.6% specificity; 98.3% and 97.6% positive and negative predictive values, respectively; 97.7% accuracy; and a 99.6% area under the receiver operator curve, while showing high convergent validity.
Conclusions
The ACAFSS is highly sensitive, specific, and valid for detecting severity levels of FI among racially diverse households with children. The ACAFSS is recommended as a stand-alone scale or a follow-up scale after households with children screen positive for FI risk. The ACAFSS is also recommended for planning interventions and evaluating their effects not only on the binary categories of food security and FI, but also on changes in levels of severity, especially when rapid decision making is crucial.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.