奥古斯丁的河马以及重新发现叙事神学对心理健康的治疗潜力

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Davi C. Ribeiro Lin
{"title":"奥古斯丁的河马以及重新发现叙事神学对心理健康的治疗潜力","authors":"Davi C. Ribeiro Lin","doi":"10.18566/cueteo.v49n112.a08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the task of therapy was a concern of classical antiquity, Hellenistic philosophy produced complex understandings on illness, treatment, and health that would inspire Augustine of Hippo (354-430) to adapt these ideals within a theological framework. Confessions (397-401) proposes an experience before divine grace that generates therapeutic effects, a proposal that fosters health and hope for his audience (Conf .10.3.4). Nevertheless, during the 20th century, Augustine’s Confessions was taken as a case study for psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic theories. The weaknesses and ambiguities narrated by Augustine were considered case study material to be fitted into concepts of psychological theory or psychopathology. Faced with the task of reviewing the dialogue between Augustinian studies and psychological studies, this article suggests that it is necessary to retrace a path, overcoming a methodological problem through three steps: firstly, a historical recovery of late antiquity philosophical therapy, placing the original intent of Confessions’ therapeutic vision in its cultural, historical, and theological context; secondly, a repositioning of the interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and theology. Despite the inadequacies of Augustine's psychologizing readings, understanding Confessions in partnership with contemporary psychology, allowing cross-fertilization, is a valid and necessary task, as in the conceptual synergy with Elementary Experience in Psychology; thirdly, the establishment and conduct of new interdisciplinary initiatives that not only strengthen historical and psychological understanding of Augustine’s Confessions, but seek to understand, apply and empirically test his narrative theological approach on its mental health effects.","PeriodicalId":32990,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Teologicas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augustine of Hippo and the rediscovery of the therapeutic potential of narrative theology for mental health\",\"authors\":\"Davi C. Ribeiro Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.18566/cueteo.v49n112.a08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the task of therapy was a concern of classical antiquity, Hellenistic philosophy produced complex understandings on illness, treatment, and health that would inspire Augustine of Hippo (354-430) to adapt these ideals within a theological framework. Confessions (397-401) proposes an experience before divine grace that generates therapeutic effects, a proposal that fosters health and hope for his audience (Conf .10.3.4). Nevertheless, during the 20th century, Augustine’s Confessions was taken as a case study for psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic theories. The weaknesses and ambiguities narrated by Augustine were considered case study material to be fitted into concepts of psychological theory or psychopathology. Faced with the task of reviewing the dialogue between Augustinian studies and psychological studies, this article suggests that it is necessary to retrace a path, overcoming a methodological problem through three steps: firstly, a historical recovery of late antiquity philosophical therapy, placing the original intent of Confessions’ therapeutic vision in its cultural, historical, and theological context; secondly, a repositioning of the interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and theology. Despite the inadequacies of Augustine's psychologizing readings, understanding Confessions in partnership with contemporary psychology, allowing cross-fertilization, is a valid and necessary task, as in the conceptual synergy with Elementary Experience in Psychology; thirdly, the establishment and conduct of new interdisciplinary initiatives that not only strengthen historical and psychological understanding of Augustine’s Confessions, but seek to understand, apply and empirically test his narrative theological approach on its mental health effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuestiones Teologicas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuestiones Teologicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18566/cueteo.v49n112.a08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Teologicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/cueteo.v49n112.a08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于治疗的任务是古典古代所关注的,希腊哲学产生了对疾病、治疗和健康的复杂理解,这启发了河马的奥古斯丁(354-430)在神学框架内调整这些理想。《忏悔录》(397-401)提出了一种在神圣恩典面前产生治疗效果的经历,这一建议为他的听众带来了健康和希望(10.3.4)。然而,在20世纪,奥古斯丁的《忏悔录》被视为精神分析和心理治疗理论的研究案例。奥古斯丁叙述的弱点和含糊之处被认为是适合心理学理论或精神病理学概念的案例研究材料。面对审视奥古斯丁研究与心理学研究之间的对话的任务,本文认为有必要通过三步走来克服方法论上的问题:首先,对古代晚期哲学治疗进行历史的恢复,将《忏悔录》治疗观的原意置于其文化、历史和神学语境中;第二,重新定位心理学与神学的跨学科对话。尽管奥古斯丁的心理学读物有不足之处,但与当代心理学合作理解《忏悔录》,允许交叉受精,是一项有效和必要的任务,就像与《心理学基本经验》的概念协同作用一样;第三,建立和实施新的跨学科倡议,不仅加强对奥古斯丁《忏悔录》的历史和心理学理解,而且寻求理解、应用和实证检验他的叙事神学方法对心理健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Augustine of Hippo and the rediscovery of the therapeutic potential of narrative theology for mental health
Since the task of therapy was a concern of classical antiquity, Hellenistic philosophy produced complex understandings on illness, treatment, and health that would inspire Augustine of Hippo (354-430) to adapt these ideals within a theological framework. Confessions (397-401) proposes an experience before divine grace that generates therapeutic effects, a proposal that fosters health and hope for his audience (Conf .10.3.4). Nevertheless, during the 20th century, Augustine’s Confessions was taken as a case study for psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic theories. The weaknesses and ambiguities narrated by Augustine were considered case study material to be fitted into concepts of psychological theory or psychopathology. Faced with the task of reviewing the dialogue between Augustinian studies and psychological studies, this article suggests that it is necessary to retrace a path, overcoming a methodological problem through three steps: firstly, a historical recovery of late antiquity philosophical therapy, placing the original intent of Confessions’ therapeutic vision in its cultural, historical, and theological context; secondly, a repositioning of the interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and theology. Despite the inadequacies of Augustine's psychologizing readings, understanding Confessions in partnership with contemporary psychology, allowing cross-fertilization, is a valid and necessary task, as in the conceptual synergy with Elementary Experience in Psychology; thirdly, the establishment and conduct of new interdisciplinary initiatives that not only strengthen historical and psychological understanding of Augustine’s Confessions, but seek to understand, apply and empirically test his narrative theological approach on its mental health effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信