职前教师新素养弹性学习模式评价

Q2 Social Sciences
Lelani C Dapat, Rivika C. Alda, Remedios C. Bacus
{"title":"职前教师新素养弹性学习模式评价","authors":"Lelani C Dapat, Rivika C. Alda, Remedios C. Bacus","doi":"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reframing educational delivery due to the unprecedented disruption of classes necessitates the utilization of flexible learning materials that cater to students’ diversity. Well-developed self-learning modules become vital to ensure continuity of learning with the flexible instructional modality. Adopting the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model and using a mixed method design, this study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the self-learning module in Building and Enhancing New Literacies across the Curriculum (BENLAC). A total of 437 preservice teachers from a state university and five content experts evaluated the module using the validated tools: module evaluation tool, questionnaire on preservice teachers’ perceptions about the module, and FGD protocol. Findings revealed that the module is developed following the principles of TAKE — Targeting the course outcomes; Anchoring the Universal Design for Learning and TPACK concepts; Keeping Gagne’s nine events of instruction; and, Engaging through reflections and research. Thematic analysis of the validation resulted in three themes: differentiated activities, research-based, and techno-integrated learning tasks, and rubric-based assessments. The majority of the preservice teachers perceived the module as aligned with the instructional design frameworks of outcomes-based education, TPACK and UDL, Diversity and Inclusivity, and facilitative learning experiences. After the enhancements, the BENLAC module was described as having well-articulated outcomes, techno-integrated activities, and outcomes-based assessments. The rigor of module development and validation provides support to the utilization of the BENLAC module and in-sights for considering adaptations to enhance the preservice teachers’ overall experience.","PeriodicalId":36846,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Flexible Learning Module on New Literacies for Preservice Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Lelani C Dapat, Rivika C. Alda, Remedios C. Bacus\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reframing educational delivery due to the unprecedented disruption of classes necessitates the utilization of flexible learning materials that cater to students’ diversity. Well-developed self-learning modules become vital to ensure continuity of learning with the flexible instructional modality. Adopting the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model and using a mixed method design, this study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the self-learning module in Building and Enhancing New Literacies across the Curriculum (BENLAC). A total of 437 preservice teachers from a state university and five content experts evaluated the module using the validated tools: module evaluation tool, questionnaire on preservice teachers’ perceptions about the module, and FGD protocol. Findings revealed that the module is developed following the principles of TAKE — Targeting the course outcomes; Anchoring the Universal Design for Learning and TPACK concepts; Keeping Gagne’s nine events of instruction; and, Engaging through reflections and research. Thematic analysis of the validation resulted in three themes: differentiated activities, research-based, and techno-integrated learning tasks, and rubric-based assessments. The majority of the preservice teachers perceived the module as aligned with the instructional design frameworks of outcomes-based education, TPACK and UDL, Diversity and Inclusivity, and facilitative learning experiences. After the enhancements, the BENLAC module was described as having well-articulated outcomes, techno-integrated activities, and outcomes-based assessments. The rigor of module development and validation provides support to the utilization of the BENLAC module and in-sights for considering adaptations to enhance the preservice teachers’ overall experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information and Education Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information and Education Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于班级的空前中断,重新构建教育交付需要使用灵活的学习材料,以满足学生的多样性。在灵活的教学模式下,完善的自主学习模块对于确保学习的连续性至关重要。本研究采用计划-行动-研究-行动(PDSA)模式,采用混合方法设计,旨在开发、实施和评估“跨课程建设和提高新素养”(BENLAC)中的自主学习模块。来自一所州立大学的437名职前教师和5名内容专家使用经过验证的工具对该模块进行了评估:模块评估工具、职前教师对该模块的看法问卷和FGD协议。调查结果显示,该模块的开发遵循了TAKE的原则——以课程成果为目标;锚定通用学习设计与TPACK概念遵守加涅的九件训诫;参与反思和研究。对验证的专题分析产生了三个主题:差异化活动、基于研究和技术集成的学习任务以及基于标准的评估。大多数职前教师认为该模块符合基于结果的教育、TPACK和UDL、多样性和包容性以及促进学习体验的教学设计框架。增强后,BENLAC模块被描述为具有清晰的结果、技术集成活动和基于结果的评估。模块开发和验证的严谨性为BENLAC模块的使用提供了支持,并为考虑适应以增强职前教师的整体体验提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Flexible Learning Module on New Literacies for Preservice Teachers
Reframing educational delivery due to the unprecedented disruption of classes necessitates the utilization of flexible learning materials that cater to students’ diversity. Well-developed self-learning modules become vital to ensure continuity of learning with the flexible instructional modality. Adopting the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model and using a mixed method design, this study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the self-learning module in Building and Enhancing New Literacies across the Curriculum (BENLAC). A total of 437 preservice teachers from a state university and five content experts evaluated the module using the validated tools: module evaluation tool, questionnaire on preservice teachers’ perceptions about the module, and FGD protocol. Findings revealed that the module is developed following the principles of TAKE — Targeting the course outcomes; Anchoring the Universal Design for Learning and TPACK concepts; Keeping Gagne’s nine events of instruction; and, Engaging through reflections and research. Thematic analysis of the validation resulted in three themes: differentiated activities, research-based, and techno-integrated learning tasks, and rubric-based assessments. The majority of the preservice teachers perceived the module as aligned with the instructional design frameworks of outcomes-based education, TPACK and UDL, Diversity and Inclusivity, and facilitative learning experiences. After the enhancements, the BENLAC module was described as having well-articulated outcomes, techno-integrated activities, and outcomes-based assessments. The rigor of module development and validation provides support to the utilization of the BENLAC module and in-sights for considering adaptations to enhance the preservice teachers’ overall experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信