急性髓系白血病患者蒽环类和阿糖胞苷标准化疗诱导失败的危险因素

C. Jehn, M. Pannenbeckers, A. Klapproth, Farouk Dahmash, H. Salwender, Anju Singh, Yana Shikova, J. Schlichting, S. Meyer, C. Niggemann, M. Vierbuchen, A. Elmaagacli
{"title":"急性髓系白血病患者蒽环类和阿糖胞苷标准化疗诱导失败的危险因素","authors":"C. Jehn, M. Pannenbeckers, A. Klapproth, Farouk Dahmash, H. Salwender, Anju Singh, Yana Shikova, J. Schlichting, S. Meyer, C. Niggemann, M. Vierbuchen, A. Elmaagacli","doi":"10.15761/JTS.1000365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Induction therapy (IT) with anthracycline and cytarabine (DA) is, despite a new era with targeted therapies such as FLT-3- or IDH-1/2- inhibitors, still the backbone of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this retrospective study we investigated possible risk factors for induction failure (IF) in 109 AML-patients, who were consecutively treated between 2013 and 2018 at our institution. We evaluated all patients at diagnosis for CMV IgG-status, LDH-value, platelet count, blast count in bone marrow (BM), Sorror comorbidity score (range 0-6), age (>70 years), cytogenetic risk factors according to the ELN classification (favourable [n=15], intermediate [n=56], or high risk [n=38]), occurrence of biclonal AML detected by flow cytometry and extramedullary AML-manifestation. In 43 (39%) patients an IF was observed. 38 of these patients went on to received a salvage therapy with idarubicin and fludarabine (n=30) or directly to allotransplant (n=8), whereas 5 patients received only best supportive care. Only age >70-years (p=0.020, odds ratio [OR] 2.5), cytogenetic adverse risk classification (p=0.014; OR 3.21), Sorror comorbidity score of >2, (p=0.019, OR 2.72), and > 40% blasts in BM (p=0.004; OR 3.64), had influence on the occurrence of IF after DA. Patients with IF or adverse cytogenetics and without subsequent transplant had a worse prognosis (2-year OS for IF 19.4% + 16.8% versus 86.9% + 7.6%, p=0.0001). In multivariate analyses for OS only transplantation (HR 0.37; [95% CI 0.19-0.76], p=0.007) and blasts >40% in BM (HR 2.24, [95% CI 1.07 – 4.68], p= 0.032), but not IF were identified as independent risk factors.","PeriodicalId":74000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of translational science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for induction failure of standard chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients\",\"authors\":\"C. Jehn, M. Pannenbeckers, A. Klapproth, Farouk Dahmash, H. Salwender, Anju Singh, Yana Shikova, J. Schlichting, S. Meyer, C. Niggemann, M. Vierbuchen, A. Elmaagacli\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/JTS.1000365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Induction therapy (IT) with anthracycline and cytarabine (DA) is, despite a new era with targeted therapies such as FLT-3- or IDH-1/2- inhibitors, still the backbone of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this retrospective study we investigated possible risk factors for induction failure (IF) in 109 AML-patients, who were consecutively treated between 2013 and 2018 at our institution. We evaluated all patients at diagnosis for CMV IgG-status, LDH-value, platelet count, blast count in bone marrow (BM), Sorror comorbidity score (range 0-6), age (>70 years), cytogenetic risk factors according to the ELN classification (favourable [n=15], intermediate [n=56], or high risk [n=38]), occurrence of biclonal AML detected by flow cytometry and extramedullary AML-manifestation. In 43 (39%) patients an IF was observed. 38 of these patients went on to received a salvage therapy with idarubicin and fludarabine (n=30) or directly to allotransplant (n=8), whereas 5 patients received only best supportive care. Only age >70-years (p=0.020, odds ratio [OR] 2.5), cytogenetic adverse risk classification (p=0.014; OR 3.21), Sorror comorbidity score of >2, (p=0.019, OR 2.72), and > 40% blasts in BM (p=0.004; OR 3.64), had influence on the occurrence of IF after DA. Patients with IF or adverse cytogenetics and without subsequent transplant had a worse prognosis (2-year OS for IF 19.4% + 16.8% versus 86.9% + 7.6%, p=0.0001). In multivariate analyses for OS only transplantation (HR 0.37; [95% CI 0.19-0.76], p=0.007) and blasts >40% in BM (HR 2.24, [95% CI 1.07 – 4.68], p= 0.032), but not IF were identified as independent risk factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/JTS.1000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of translational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/JTS.1000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管FLT-3-或IDH-1/2-抑制剂等靶向治疗进入了一个新时代,但蒽环类药物和阿糖胞苷(DA)诱导治疗(IT)仍然是急性髓性白血病(AML)治疗的主要方法。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了2013年至2018年在我院连续治疗的109例aml患者诱导失败(IF)的可能危险因素。在诊断时,我们对所有患者进行CMV igg状态、ldl值、血小板计数、骨髓细胞计数(BM)、Sorror合并症评分(范围0-6)、年龄(0- 70岁)、细胞遗传学危险因素(有利[n=15]、中等[n=56]、高风险[n=38])、流式细胞术检测的双克隆AML的发生情况和髓外AML表现进行评估。43例(39%)患者出现IF。其中38例患者继续接受伊达柔比星和氟达拉滨的补救性治疗(n=30)或直接进行同种异体移植(n=8),而5例患者仅接受最佳支持治疗。仅年龄为0 ~ 70岁(p=0.020,优势比[OR] 2.5),细胞遗传学不良风险分型(p=0.014;OR 3.21), Sorror合并症评分>2,(p=0.019, OR 2.72), > 40% BM (p=0.004;OR 3.64),对DA后IF的发生有影响。IF或不良细胞遗传学且未进行移植的患者预后较差(IF的2年OS为19.4% + 16.8%对86.9% + 7.6%,p=0.0001)。在多变量分析中,单纯OS移植(HR 0.37;[95% CI 0.19-0.76], p=0.007)和BM中原细胞>40% (HR 2.24, [95% CI 1.07 - 4.68], p= 0.032),但IF未被确定为独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors for induction failure of standard chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients
Induction therapy (IT) with anthracycline and cytarabine (DA) is, despite a new era with targeted therapies such as FLT-3- or IDH-1/2- inhibitors, still the backbone of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this retrospective study we investigated possible risk factors for induction failure (IF) in 109 AML-patients, who were consecutively treated between 2013 and 2018 at our institution. We evaluated all patients at diagnosis for CMV IgG-status, LDH-value, platelet count, blast count in bone marrow (BM), Sorror comorbidity score (range 0-6), age (>70 years), cytogenetic risk factors according to the ELN classification (favourable [n=15], intermediate [n=56], or high risk [n=38]), occurrence of biclonal AML detected by flow cytometry and extramedullary AML-manifestation. In 43 (39%) patients an IF was observed. 38 of these patients went on to received a salvage therapy with idarubicin and fludarabine (n=30) or directly to allotransplant (n=8), whereas 5 patients received only best supportive care. Only age >70-years (p=0.020, odds ratio [OR] 2.5), cytogenetic adverse risk classification (p=0.014; OR 3.21), Sorror comorbidity score of >2, (p=0.019, OR 2.72), and > 40% blasts in BM (p=0.004; OR 3.64), had influence on the occurrence of IF after DA. Patients with IF or adverse cytogenetics and without subsequent transplant had a worse prognosis (2-year OS for IF 19.4% + 16.8% versus 86.9% + 7.6%, p=0.0001). In multivariate analyses for OS only transplantation (HR 0.37; [95% CI 0.19-0.76], p=0.007) and blasts >40% in BM (HR 2.24, [95% CI 1.07 – 4.68], p= 0.032), but not IF were identified as independent risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信