根据DIN EN ISO 15197:2015对血糖自我监测系统GL50 evo和GL 44的系统准确性评估-低血糖(<70 mg/dL)和高血糖(≥180 mg/dL)血糖范围的准确性比较

E. Salzsieder, A. Puchert, EJ Freyse, S. Berg
{"title":"根据DIN EN ISO 15197:2015对血糖自我监测系统GL50 evo和GL 44的系统准确性评估-低血糖(<70 mg/dL)和高血糖(≥180 mg/dL)血糖范围的准确性比较","authors":"E. Salzsieder, A. Puchert, EJ Freyse, S. Berg","doi":"10.15761/JTS.1000348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ongoing standardized verification of the accuracy of blood glucose meters systems for self-monitoring post-launch is important clinically and helps confirm appropriate continues performance of selfmonitoring blood glucose (SMBG) systems [1]. In addition, publication of such studies is increasingly becoming a component of evidence-based purchase decision making. ISO 15197:2015, [2] for which mandatory compliance is recommended for SMBG systems by 2015, [3] has tighter accuracy requirements than ISO 15197:2003, [4] and outlines current minimum accuracy standards necessary in Europe for CE marking. In the present study, a postmarketing evaluation of the CE-marked GL50 evo and GL44 systems were performed in accordance with ISO 15197:2015 protocols and requirements. The GL50 evo and GL44 systems were supplied in Germany from the Beurer GmbH, Germany. A declaration of conformity from the manufacturer of the two measuring systems was available before the start of the study, so that only the GL50 evo was used in the tests, but the results documented the quality of bothsystems. Two GL50 evo systems (serial number: GL55 T1 and GL55 T2) and strips from 3 different lots (A 10/1, A 10/3,A 10/4) with expiry dates March 2017 respectively) were supplied by the manufacturer. The study was","PeriodicalId":74000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of translational science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System accuracy evaluation of the systems for selfmonitoring of blood glucose GL50 evo and GL 44 following DIN EN ISO 15197:2015 – A comparison of accuracy in hypo (<70 mg/dL)- and hyper glycemic (≥180 mg/dL) glucose ranges\",\"authors\":\"E. Salzsieder, A. Puchert, EJ Freyse, S. Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/JTS.1000348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ongoing standardized verification of the accuracy of blood glucose meters systems for self-monitoring post-launch is important clinically and helps confirm appropriate continues performance of selfmonitoring blood glucose (SMBG) systems [1]. In addition, publication of such studies is increasingly becoming a component of evidence-based purchase decision making. ISO 15197:2015, [2] for which mandatory compliance is recommended for SMBG systems by 2015, [3] has tighter accuracy requirements than ISO 15197:2003, [4] and outlines current minimum accuracy standards necessary in Europe for CE marking. In the present study, a postmarketing evaluation of the CE-marked GL50 evo and GL44 systems were performed in accordance with ISO 15197:2015 protocols and requirements. The GL50 evo and GL44 systems were supplied in Germany from the Beurer GmbH, Germany. A declaration of conformity from the manufacturer of the two measuring systems was available before the start of the study, so that only the GL50 evo was used in the tests, but the results documented the quality of bothsystems. Two GL50 evo systems (serial number: GL55 T1 and GL55 T2) and strips from 3 different lots (A 10/1, A 10/3,A 10/4) with expiry dates March 2017 respectively) were supplied by the manufacturer. The study was\",\"PeriodicalId\":74000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/JTS.1000348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of translational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/JTS.1000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在启动后对用于自我监测的血糖仪系统的准确性进行持续的标准化验证具有重要的临床意义,并有助于确认自我监测血糖(SMBG)系统的适当持续性能[1]。此外,此类研究的发表正日益成为基于证据的购买决策的一个组成部分。ISO 15197:2015,[2],到2015年强制要求SMBG系统遵守,[3]比ISO 15197:2003,[4]有更严格的精度要求,并概述了欧洲CE标志所需的当前最低精度标准。在本研究中,根据ISO 15197:2015协议和要求,对ce标记的GL50 evo和GL44系统进行了上市后评估。GL50 evo和GL44系统由德国Beurer GmbH提供。在研究开始之前,两种测量系统的制造商有一份符合性声明,因此在测试中只使用GL50 evo,但结果记录了两种系统的质量。制造商提供了两个GL50 evo系统(序列号:GL55 T1和GL55 T2)和3个不同批次(A 10/1, A 10/3,A 10/4)的条带,有效期分别为2017年3月)。这项研究是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System accuracy evaluation of the systems for selfmonitoring of blood glucose GL50 evo and GL 44 following DIN EN ISO 15197:2015 – A comparison of accuracy in hypo (<70 mg/dL)- and hyper glycemic (≥180 mg/dL) glucose ranges
Ongoing standardized verification of the accuracy of blood glucose meters systems for self-monitoring post-launch is important clinically and helps confirm appropriate continues performance of selfmonitoring blood glucose (SMBG) systems [1]. In addition, publication of such studies is increasingly becoming a component of evidence-based purchase decision making. ISO 15197:2015, [2] for which mandatory compliance is recommended for SMBG systems by 2015, [3] has tighter accuracy requirements than ISO 15197:2003, [4] and outlines current minimum accuracy standards necessary in Europe for CE marking. In the present study, a postmarketing evaluation of the CE-marked GL50 evo and GL44 systems were performed in accordance with ISO 15197:2015 protocols and requirements. The GL50 evo and GL44 systems were supplied in Germany from the Beurer GmbH, Germany. A declaration of conformity from the manufacturer of the two measuring systems was available before the start of the study, so that only the GL50 evo was used in the tests, but the results documented the quality of bothsystems. Two GL50 evo systems (serial number: GL55 T1 and GL55 T2) and strips from 3 different lots (A 10/1, A 10/3,A 10/4) with expiry dates March 2017 respectively) were supplied by the manufacturer. The study was
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信