腓骨跟肌内肌腱:用关节镜治疗一例罕见的后踝关节撞击

Liselore Maeckelbergh, G. Matricali, Sander Wuite
{"title":"腓骨跟肌内肌腱:用关节镜治疗一例罕见的后踝关节撞击","authors":"Liselore Maeckelbergh, G. Matricali, Sander Wuite","doi":"10.15761/CCRR.1000400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 20-year-old man, a semiprofessional hurdler, presented on the outpatient clinic with a six months history of pain posterior in the left ankle during sport activities. On physical examination there was pain palpating the posterior ankle joint and around the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) region posteromedial in the ankle during active flexion of the hallux. There was deep pain on the posterior process of the talus with a positive forced plantarflexion posterior impingement test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed signs of posterior impingement with limited fluid distension of FHL sheath and a prominent posterior process. SPECT CT showed an increased uptake in the posterior process of the talus. Because of his complaints and high demanding level of sport activities an arthroscopic partial resection of the posterior process was suggested with a release of the FHL. The posterior arthroscopy was performed with the two posterior portals technique described by van Dijk [1]. The presumed FHL was located and the prominence of posterior process of the talus revealed. After resection of the prominence we noticed that the presumed FHL was not moving by flexion and extension of the hallux, but moved just with the mobilisation of the calcaneus. After careful inspection of the tendon, a second tendon anterior to the forementioned tendon was revealed. This tendon prooved to be the FHL, when the hallux was flexed and extended. The anatomically more posterior tendon appeared to be an accessory tendon (Figures 1 and 2). With mobilization of the hallux, there was no movement of this tendon, it only moved when the calcaneum was mobilised. We presumed that it was the peroneocalcaneus internus (PCI) tendon. An accessory posteromedial portal was made to perform a resection with the punch, scissor and shaver, because of the interference with the FHL in his tunnel (Figure 3). After this procedure the FHL could run freely in the tunnel without a sign of impingement. Postoperatively the pain was resolved. The Foot Abstract","PeriodicalId":72607,"journal":{"name":"Clinical case reports and reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The peroneocalcaneus internus tendon: case report of a rare cause of posterior ankle impingement treated by arthroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Liselore Maeckelbergh, G. Matricali, Sander Wuite\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/CCRR.1000400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 20-year-old man, a semiprofessional hurdler, presented on the outpatient clinic with a six months history of pain posterior in the left ankle during sport activities. On physical examination there was pain palpating the posterior ankle joint and around the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) region posteromedial in the ankle during active flexion of the hallux. There was deep pain on the posterior process of the talus with a positive forced plantarflexion posterior impingement test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed signs of posterior impingement with limited fluid distension of FHL sheath and a prominent posterior process. SPECT CT showed an increased uptake in the posterior process of the talus. Because of his complaints and high demanding level of sport activities an arthroscopic partial resection of the posterior process was suggested with a release of the FHL. The posterior arthroscopy was performed with the two posterior portals technique described by van Dijk [1]. The presumed FHL was located and the prominence of posterior process of the talus revealed. After resection of the prominence we noticed that the presumed FHL was not moving by flexion and extension of the hallux, but moved just with the mobilisation of the calcaneus. After careful inspection of the tendon, a second tendon anterior to the forementioned tendon was revealed. This tendon prooved to be the FHL, when the hallux was flexed and extended. The anatomically more posterior tendon appeared to be an accessory tendon (Figures 1 and 2). With mobilization of the hallux, there was no movement of this tendon, it only moved when the calcaneum was mobilised. We presumed that it was the peroneocalcaneus internus (PCI) tendon. An accessory posteromedial portal was made to perform a resection with the punch, scissor and shaver, because of the interference with the FHL in his tunnel (Figure 3). After this procedure the FHL could run freely in the tunnel without a sign of impingement. Postoperatively the pain was resolved. The Foot Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":72607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical case reports and reviews\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical case reports and reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/CCRR.1000400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical case reports and reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/CCRR.1000400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一名20岁男子,半职业跨栏运动员,因运动时左脚踝后部疼痛6个月就诊于门诊。体格检查发现,在拇关节主动屈曲时,可触诊踝关节后侧和拇长屈肌(FHL)区周围。距骨后突有深度疼痛,强制跖屈后撞击试验阳性。磁共振成像(MRI)显示后撞击的迹象,FHL鞘有限的液体膨胀和突出的后突。SPECT CT显示距骨后突摄取增高。由于他的抱怨和高要求的运动活动,建议在关节镜下部分切除后突并释放FHL。采用van Dijk[1]描述的两个后门静脉技术进行后关节镜检查。假定的FHL被定位,并显示距骨后突的突出。切除突出后,我们注意到假定的FHL不是通过拇趾的屈伸来移动的,而是通过跟骨的活动来移动的。仔细检查肌腱后,发现前面提到的肌腱前面的第二肌腱。当拇趾屈曲和伸展时,该肌腱被证明是FHL。解剖上更后方的肌腱似乎是副肌腱(图1和2)。当拇趾活动时,该肌腱没有运动,只有当跟骨活动时才运动。我们推测是腓骨跟内肌(PCI)肌腱。由于FHL在隧道中受到干扰,我们使用冲床、剪刀和剃须刀切除了副后内侧门静脉(图3)。手术后,FHL可以在隧道中自由运动,没有碰撞迹象。术后疼痛消失。脚文摘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The peroneocalcaneus internus tendon: case report of a rare cause of posterior ankle impingement treated by arthroscopy
A 20-year-old man, a semiprofessional hurdler, presented on the outpatient clinic with a six months history of pain posterior in the left ankle during sport activities. On physical examination there was pain palpating the posterior ankle joint and around the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) region posteromedial in the ankle during active flexion of the hallux. There was deep pain on the posterior process of the talus with a positive forced plantarflexion posterior impingement test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed signs of posterior impingement with limited fluid distension of FHL sheath and a prominent posterior process. SPECT CT showed an increased uptake in the posterior process of the talus. Because of his complaints and high demanding level of sport activities an arthroscopic partial resection of the posterior process was suggested with a release of the FHL. The posterior arthroscopy was performed with the two posterior portals technique described by van Dijk [1]. The presumed FHL was located and the prominence of posterior process of the talus revealed. After resection of the prominence we noticed that the presumed FHL was not moving by flexion and extension of the hallux, but moved just with the mobilisation of the calcaneus. After careful inspection of the tendon, a second tendon anterior to the forementioned tendon was revealed. This tendon prooved to be the FHL, when the hallux was flexed and extended. The anatomically more posterior tendon appeared to be an accessory tendon (Figures 1 and 2). With mobilization of the hallux, there was no movement of this tendon, it only moved when the calcaneum was mobilised. We presumed that it was the peroneocalcaneus internus (PCI) tendon. An accessory posteromedial portal was made to perform a resection with the punch, scissor and shaver, because of the interference with the FHL in his tunnel (Figure 3). After this procedure the FHL could run freely in the tunnel without a sign of impingement. Postoperatively the pain was resolved. The Foot Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信