体外评价金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌在合成外科植入材料上的多微生物生物膜生长

B. Colgan, Brooke A Pati, W. Kurata, Timothy S. Horseman, L. Pierce
{"title":"体外评价金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌在合成外科植入材料上的多微生物生物膜生长","authors":"B. Colgan, Brooke A Pati, W. Kurata, Timothy S. Horseman, L. Pierce","doi":"10.15761/brcp.1000206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biofilms are a known important contributor to the infectious complications associated with prosthetic mesh implantation. Previous studies have demonstrated the formation of monomicrobial biofilms on surgical mesh materials by different bacterial species in vitro , but a paucity of data exists examining polymicrobial biofilm formation by antibiotic-resistant organisms, which may be more clinically relevant. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of three clinical bacterial and fungal isolates to form mixed-species and single-species biofilms on five synthetic implant materials in vitro , including monofilament polypropylene, monofilament polyester, multifilament polyester, monofilament polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and silicone. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans (alone or in combination) were inoculated into culture medium containing meshes and allowed to attach and propagate into mature biofilms for 48 hours at 37 o C. Additional samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis for comparison. Biofilm biomass and the number of viable cells were quantified by crystal violet staining and colony forming units (CFU) counting, respectively. Images of polymicrobial biofilms were obtained using fluorescence microscopy of FM ® 1-43-stained meshes. All materials investigated were capable of harboring biofilms, but the relative abundance was dependent upon both material and organism type. Overall, PTFE meshes exhibited the highest levels of polymicrobial biofilm formation. When comparing monomicrobial biofilms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated greater biomass than MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis on PTFE, polypropylene, and monofilament polyester, while MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis biomass did not differ significantly among mesh types. Thus MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans can cooperatively form mature biofilms on surgical implant materials, but different mesh constructs vary in their susceptibility to biofilm formation depending upon the organism(s) present. This suggests that the type of implant material chosen for surgical procedures may affect the patient’s wound healing response and clinical outcome, particularly when used in a contaminated environment.","PeriodicalId":92336,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical research and clinical practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans polymicrobial biofilm growth on synthetic surgical implant materials\",\"authors\":\"B. Colgan, Brooke A Pati, W. Kurata, Timothy S. Horseman, L. Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/brcp.1000206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biofilms are a known important contributor to the infectious complications associated with prosthetic mesh implantation. Previous studies have demonstrated the formation of monomicrobial biofilms on surgical mesh materials by different bacterial species in vitro , but a paucity of data exists examining polymicrobial biofilm formation by antibiotic-resistant organisms, which may be more clinically relevant. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of three clinical bacterial and fungal isolates to form mixed-species and single-species biofilms on five synthetic implant materials in vitro , including monofilament polypropylene, monofilament polyester, multifilament polyester, monofilament polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and silicone. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans (alone or in combination) were inoculated into culture medium containing meshes and allowed to attach and propagate into mature biofilms for 48 hours at 37 o C. Additional samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis for comparison. Biofilm biomass and the number of viable cells were quantified by crystal violet staining and colony forming units (CFU) counting, respectively. Images of polymicrobial biofilms were obtained using fluorescence microscopy of FM ® 1-43-stained meshes. All materials investigated were capable of harboring biofilms, but the relative abundance was dependent upon both material and organism type. Overall, PTFE meshes exhibited the highest levels of polymicrobial biofilm formation. When comparing monomicrobial biofilms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated greater biomass than MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis on PTFE, polypropylene, and monofilament polyester, while MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis biomass did not differ significantly among mesh types. Thus MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans can cooperatively form mature biofilms on surgical implant materials, but different mesh constructs vary in their susceptibility to biofilm formation depending upon the organism(s) present. This suggests that the type of implant material chosen for surgical procedures may affect the patient’s wound healing response and clinical outcome, particularly when used in a contaminated environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/brcp.1000206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/brcp.1000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物膜是已知的与假体网状植入相关的感染并发症的重要贡献者。先前的研究已经证明了不同细菌种类在体外手术补片材料上形成单微生物生物膜,但缺乏关于抗生素耐药生物形成多微生物生物膜的数据,这可能更具有临床相关性。因此,本研究的目的是评估临床分离的三种细菌和真菌在五种体外合成植入材料上形成混合物种和单一物种生物膜的能力,包括单丝聚丙烯、单丝聚酯、多丝聚酯、单丝聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和硅酮。将耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐多药铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌(单独或联合)接种到含有网状物的培养基中,在37℃下附着并繁殖成成熟的生物膜48小时。采用结晶紫染色法和菌落形成单位(colony forming units, CFU)计数法分别测定生物膜生物量和活细胞数。使用FM®1-43染色网的荧光显微镜获得多微生物生物膜的图像。所有被调查的材料都能够容纳生物膜,但相对丰度取决于材料和生物类型。总体而言,聚四氟乙烯网显示出最高水平的多微生物生物膜的形成。在比较单微生物生物膜时,铜绿假单胞菌在聚四氟乙烯、聚丙烯和单丝聚酯上的生物量大于MRSA和表皮葡萄球菌,而MRSA和表皮葡萄球菌的生物量在网状类型之间没有显著差异。因此,MRSA、铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌可以在外科植入材料上共同形成成熟的生物膜,但不同的网状结构对生物膜形成的易感性因存在的生物体而异。这表明,外科手术中选择的植入材料类型可能会影响患者的伤口愈合反应和临床结果,特别是在污染环境中使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans polymicrobial biofilm growth on synthetic surgical implant materials
Biofilms are a known important contributor to the infectious complications associated with prosthetic mesh implantation. Previous studies have demonstrated the formation of monomicrobial biofilms on surgical mesh materials by different bacterial species in vitro , but a paucity of data exists examining polymicrobial biofilm formation by antibiotic-resistant organisms, which may be more clinically relevant. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of three clinical bacterial and fungal isolates to form mixed-species and single-species biofilms on five synthetic implant materials in vitro , including monofilament polypropylene, monofilament polyester, multifilament polyester, monofilament polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and silicone. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans (alone or in combination) were inoculated into culture medium containing meshes and allowed to attach and propagate into mature biofilms for 48 hours at 37 o C. Additional samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis for comparison. Biofilm biomass and the number of viable cells were quantified by crystal violet staining and colony forming units (CFU) counting, respectively. Images of polymicrobial biofilms were obtained using fluorescence microscopy of FM ® 1-43-stained meshes. All materials investigated were capable of harboring biofilms, but the relative abundance was dependent upon both material and organism type. Overall, PTFE meshes exhibited the highest levels of polymicrobial biofilm formation. When comparing monomicrobial biofilms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated greater biomass than MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis on PTFE, polypropylene, and monofilament polyester, while MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis biomass did not differ significantly among mesh types. Thus MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Candida albicans can cooperatively form mature biofilms on surgical implant materials, but different mesh constructs vary in their susceptibility to biofilm formation depending upon the organism(s) present. This suggests that the type of implant material chosen for surgical procedures may affect the patient’s wound healing response and clinical outcome, particularly when used in a contaminated environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信