{"title":"来自Naḥal Aviv的青铜时代早期中期迦南圣甲虫:Tufnell侧型e6b和d14之间的差异,以及圣甲虫传家宝范式在后来背景下的相关性","authors":"B. Brandl","doi":"10.1553/0x003b51a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication of a Middle Bronze Age scarab found in an Early Roman period rock-cut burial cave at Naḥal Aviv in the Upper Galilee serves as a platform for the following additional issues: The precise definition of the scarab’s side type; the possible time span of its production; the preferable chronological division for the Middle Bronze Age Canaanite scarabs; the relevance of the Heirloom Paradigm for the presence of earlier glyptic objects in later contexts.","PeriodicalId":39067,"journal":{"name":"Agypten und Levante","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Early Middle Bronze Age Canaanite Scarab from Naḥal Aviv: The Difference Between Tufnell’s Side Types e6b and d14, and the Relevance of the Heirloom Paradigm for Scarabs in Later Contexts\",\"authors\":\"B. Brandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1553/0x003b51a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The publication of a Middle Bronze Age scarab found in an Early Roman period rock-cut burial cave at Naḥal Aviv in the Upper Galilee serves as a platform for the following additional issues: The precise definition of the scarab’s side type; the possible time span of its production; the preferable chronological division for the Middle Bronze Age Canaanite scarabs; the relevance of the Heirloom Paradigm for the presence of earlier glyptic objects in later contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agypten und Levante\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agypten und Levante\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1553/0x003b51a3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agypten und Levante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/0x003b51a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Early Middle Bronze Age Canaanite Scarab from Naḥal Aviv: The Difference Between Tufnell’s Side Types e6b and d14, and the Relevance of the Heirloom Paradigm for Scarabs in Later Contexts
The publication of a Middle Bronze Age scarab found in an Early Roman period rock-cut burial cave at Naḥal Aviv in the Upper Galilee serves as a platform for the following additional issues: The precise definition of the scarab’s side type; the possible time span of its production; the preferable chronological division for the Middle Bronze Age Canaanite scarabs; the relevance of the Heirloom Paradigm for the presence of earlier glyptic objects in later contexts.