宇宙学和熵创造论

H. Kragh
{"title":"宇宙学和熵创造论","authors":"H. Kragh","doi":"10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the second law of thermodynamics is assumed to be valid for the universe as a whole, it follows that the world must have had a beginning in time. This so-called entropic creation argument was introduced in the late 1860s, although versions of it, that built on decay in a general sense, can be found earlier. During the subsequent decades it and its implications were much discussed by scientists, philosophers, theologians, and social critics. The main reason for the controversial nature of the argument was that it could be, and in fact was, used apologetically, as an argument in favour of divine creation. As a consequence, some authors of a materialistic or positivistic orientation denied the general validity of the second law. From about 1920 the debate concerning the entropic argument declined, but traces of it can still be found in the modern literature on cosmology and religion.","PeriodicalId":81438,"journal":{"name":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","volume":"37 1","pages":"369-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmology and the entropic creation argument\",\"authors\":\"H. Kragh\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If the second law of thermodynamics is assumed to be valid for the universe as a whole, it follows that the world must have had a beginning in time. This so-called entropic creation argument was introduced in the late 1860s, although versions of it, that built on decay in a general sense, can be found earlier. During the subsequent decades it and its implications were much discussed by scientists, philosophers, theologians, and social critics. The main reason for the controversial nature of the argument was that it could be, and in fact was, used apologetically, as an argument in favour of divine creation. As a consequence, some authors of a materialistic or positivistic orientation denied the general validity of the second law. From about 1920 the debate concerning the entropic argument declined, but traces of it can still be found in the modern literature on cosmology and religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"369-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

如果假定热力学第二定律对整个宇宙是有效的,那么世界必然在时间上有一个开端。这个所谓的熵创造论是在19世纪60年代末提出的,尽管在更早的时候就可以找到建立在一般意义上的衰变基础上的版本。在随后的几十年里,科学家、哲学家、神学家和社会评论家对它及其含义进行了大量讨论。这一论点具有争议性的主要原因是,它可以,事实上,被用来作为支持神性创造的论据。因此,一些唯物主义或实证主义倾向的作者否认第二定律的一般有效性。大约从1920年开始,关于熵论的争论逐渐减少,但在现代宇宙学和宗教文献中仍然可以找到它的痕迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cosmology and the entropic creation argument
If the second law of thermodynamics is assumed to be valid for the universe as a whole, it follows that the world must have had a beginning in time. This so-called entropic creation argument was introduced in the late 1860s, although versions of it, that built on decay in a general sense, can be found earlier. During the subsequent decades it and its implications were much discussed by scientists, philosophers, theologians, and social critics. The main reason for the controversial nature of the argument was that it could be, and in fact was, used apologetically, as an argument in favour of divine creation. As a consequence, some authors of a materialistic or positivistic orientation denied the general validity of the second law. From about 1920 the debate concerning the entropic argument declined, but traces of it can still be found in the modern literature on cosmology and religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信