淹没在数据中:卫星海洋学和地球科学中的信息超载

E. Conway
{"title":"淹没在数据中:卫星海洋学和地球科学中的信息超载","authors":"E. Conway","doi":"10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the late 20 th century, remote sensing from space offered a means of resolving one of the principal challenges plaguing physical oceanographers, poor spatial sampling. But in fact, remote sensing offered an opposing problem––so much data that the traditional oceanographic institutions were not equipped to cope with it. NASA decided to resolve this problem by having the Jet Propulsion Laboratory construct an oceanographic data center at its Pasadena facility. This represents a new kind of scientific institution, whose purpose is the development, validation, and distribution of scientific data to third-party users. Since 1990, NASA has established several such facilities, each rooted in a subset of the Earth science disciplines and each making its data publicly available via the Internet. In so doing, it reversed a decades-old policy that had given an instrument9s science team proprietary privileges. Agency leaders did this to expand scientific demand for NASA9s capabilities, thus buttressing the agency9s political support; because they believed remote sensing could enable great scientific strides; because they thought open access to data would foster competition and thus produce better scientific results; and because they believed that publicly-funded data should be public. In the process, they created a ““market”” for oceanographic data far larger than that represented by professional oceanographers.","PeriodicalId":81438,"journal":{"name":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","volume":"77 1","pages":"127-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drowning in data: Satellite oceanography and information overload in the Earth sciences\",\"authors\":\"E. Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the late 20 th century, remote sensing from space offered a means of resolving one of the principal challenges plaguing physical oceanographers, poor spatial sampling. But in fact, remote sensing offered an opposing problem––so much data that the traditional oceanographic institutions were not equipped to cope with it. NASA decided to resolve this problem by having the Jet Propulsion Laboratory construct an oceanographic data center at its Pasadena facility. This represents a new kind of scientific institution, whose purpose is the development, validation, and distribution of scientific data to third-party users. Since 1990, NASA has established several such facilities, each rooted in a subset of the Earth science disciplines and each making its data publicly available via the Internet. In so doing, it reversed a decades-old policy that had given an instrument9s science team proprietary privileges. Agency leaders did this to expand scientific demand for NASA9s capabilities, thus buttressing the agency9s political support; because they believed remote sensing could enable great scientific strides; because they thought open access to data would foster competition and thus produce better scientific results; and because they believed that publicly-funded data should be public. In the process, they created a ““market”” for oceanographic data far larger than that represented by professional oceanographers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"127-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2006.37.1.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

在20世纪后期,空间遥感为解决困扰物理海洋学家的主要挑战之一提供了一种手段,即糟糕的空间采样。但事实上,遥感带来了一个相反的问题——数据太多,传统的海洋学机构没有能力处理它。为了解决这个问题,美国宇航局决定让喷气推进实验室在其帕萨迪纳工厂建造一个海洋学数据中心。这代表了一种新型的科学机构,其目的是开发、验证和向第三方用户分发科学数据。自1990年以来,美国宇航局已经建立了几个这样的设施,每个都植根于地球科学学科的一个子集,每个都通过互联网公开提供其数据。这样一来,它就推翻了几十年前赋予仪器科学团队专有特权的政策。机构领导人这样做是为了扩大对nasa能力的科学需求,从而巩固该机构的政治支持;因为他们相信遥感可以使科学取得巨大进步;因为他们认为开放数据获取会促进竞争,从而产生更好的科学成果;因为他们认为公共资助的数据应该是公开的。在这个过程中,他们为海洋数据创造了一个远远大于专业海洋学家所代表的“市场”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drowning in data: Satellite oceanography and information overload in the Earth sciences
ABSTRACT In the late 20 th century, remote sensing from space offered a means of resolving one of the principal challenges plaguing physical oceanographers, poor spatial sampling. But in fact, remote sensing offered an opposing problem––so much data that the traditional oceanographic institutions were not equipped to cope with it. NASA decided to resolve this problem by having the Jet Propulsion Laboratory construct an oceanographic data center at its Pasadena facility. This represents a new kind of scientific institution, whose purpose is the development, validation, and distribution of scientific data to third-party users. Since 1990, NASA has established several such facilities, each rooted in a subset of the Earth science disciplines and each making its data publicly available via the Internet. In so doing, it reversed a decades-old policy that had given an instrument9s science team proprietary privileges. Agency leaders did this to expand scientific demand for NASA9s capabilities, thus buttressing the agency9s political support; because they believed remote sensing could enable great scientific strides; because they thought open access to data would foster competition and thus produce better scientific results; and because they believed that publicly-funded data should be public. In the process, they created a ““market”” for oceanographic data far larger than that represented by professional oceanographers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信