宾夕法尼亚德语在西弗吉尼亚州作为语言实验室

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Silke Van Ness
{"title":"宾夕法尼亚德语在西弗吉尼亚州作为语言实验室","authors":"Silke Van Ness","doi":"10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pennsylvania German dialect in West Virginia serves as a linguistic laboratory where variation and changes can be studied that are attributable to isolation, language contact, and the preservation of archaisms. In 1930 Schirmunski suggested that speech islands established as recently as one hundred or one hundred and fifty years ago offer a unique opportunity as a \"sprachwissenschaftliches Laboratorium\" a laboratory for language change because their geographic and linguistic isolation reflects developments which required many centuries in the homeland (Schirmunski 1930: 113). While the colonial German of the primary settlements in Pennsylvania has been extensively documented (cf. fieldwork by Buffington 1937; Reed 1941; Seifert 1941; Frye 1941; Raith 1982; Louden 1988; Dorian 1989; Huffines 1989), research on Pennsylvania German in secondary areas has not received the same amount of attention. This is particularly true of the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia and its extended territory, Pendleton County, West Virginia (cf. Kyger 1964; Pulte 1971; Kehr 1979). Yet Pendleton County offers extremely insightful data on language development in isolation and contact situations. Based on findings from this early speech island, the study will document that (I) the presence of archaisms in West Virginia is evidence of dialect features in their preleveled form and (II) that contact induced changes conform to rules of English phonotactics. Examples from phonology are used to illustrate most conspicuously the notion of a linguistic laboratory'.","PeriodicalId":41369,"journal":{"name":"Dialectologia et Geolinguistica","volume":"1996 1","pages":"100 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pennsylvania German in West Virginia as a Linguistic Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Silke Van Ness\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Pennsylvania German dialect in West Virginia serves as a linguistic laboratory where variation and changes can be studied that are attributable to isolation, language contact, and the preservation of archaisms. In 1930 Schirmunski suggested that speech islands established as recently as one hundred or one hundred and fifty years ago offer a unique opportunity as a \\\"sprachwissenschaftliches Laboratorium\\\" a laboratory for language change because their geographic and linguistic isolation reflects developments which required many centuries in the homeland (Schirmunski 1930: 113). While the colonial German of the primary settlements in Pennsylvania has been extensively documented (cf. fieldwork by Buffington 1937; Reed 1941; Seifert 1941; Frye 1941; Raith 1982; Louden 1988; Dorian 1989; Huffines 1989), research on Pennsylvania German in secondary areas has not received the same amount of attention. This is particularly true of the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia and its extended territory, Pendleton County, West Virginia (cf. Kyger 1964; Pulte 1971; Kehr 1979). Yet Pendleton County offers extremely insightful data on language development in isolation and contact situations. Based on findings from this early speech island, the study will document that (I) the presence of archaisms in West Virginia is evidence of dialect features in their preleveled form and (II) that contact induced changes conform to rules of English phonotactics. Examples from phonology are used to illustrate most conspicuously the notion of a linguistic laboratory'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialectologia et Geolinguistica\",\"volume\":\"1996 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialectologia et Geolinguistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialectologia et Geolinguistica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dig.1996.1996.4.87","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西弗吉尼亚州的宾夕法尼亚德语方言充当了一个语言实验室,在那里可以研究由于隔离、语言接触和古语保存而产生的变异和变化。1930年,Schirmunski提出,在一百或一百五十年前建立的语言岛提供了一个独特的机会,作为语言变化的实验室,因为它们在地理和语言上的孤立反映了在祖国需要许多世纪的发展(Schirmunski 1930: 113)。虽然宾夕法尼亚州主要定居点的殖民德国已被广泛记录(参见Buffington 1937年的田野调查;瑞德1941;塞弗特1941;Frye 1941;Raith 1982;提高声音1988;多里安人1989;Huffines 1989),对宾夕法尼亚德语在次要领域的研究并没有得到同样的重视。弗吉尼亚州的谢南多厄河谷地区及其延伸的领土,西弗吉尼亚州的彭德尔顿县尤其如此(参见Kyger 1964;帕尔1971;Kehr 1979)。然而,彭德尔顿县提供了在孤立和接触情况下语言发展的极具洞察力的数据。基于这个早期语言岛的发现,这项研究将证明:(1)西弗吉尼亚州古语言的存在是方言特征处于预先水平形式的证据;(2)接触引起的变化符合英语语音策略的规则。音系学的例子被用来最明显地说明语言实验室的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pennsylvania German in West Virginia as a Linguistic Laboratory
The Pennsylvania German dialect in West Virginia serves as a linguistic laboratory where variation and changes can be studied that are attributable to isolation, language contact, and the preservation of archaisms. In 1930 Schirmunski suggested that speech islands established as recently as one hundred or one hundred and fifty years ago offer a unique opportunity as a "sprachwissenschaftliches Laboratorium" a laboratory for language change because their geographic and linguistic isolation reflects developments which required many centuries in the homeland (Schirmunski 1930: 113). While the colonial German of the primary settlements in Pennsylvania has been extensively documented (cf. fieldwork by Buffington 1937; Reed 1941; Seifert 1941; Frye 1941; Raith 1982; Louden 1988; Dorian 1989; Huffines 1989), research on Pennsylvania German in secondary areas has not received the same amount of attention. This is particularly true of the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia and its extended territory, Pendleton County, West Virginia (cf. Kyger 1964; Pulte 1971; Kehr 1979). Yet Pendleton County offers extremely insightful data on language development in isolation and contact situations. Based on findings from this early speech island, the study will document that (I) the presence of archaisms in West Virginia is evidence of dialect features in their preleveled form and (II) that contact induced changes conform to rules of English phonotactics. Examples from phonology are used to illustrate most conspicuously the notion of a linguistic laboratory'.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信