William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD
{"title":"地塞米松预防快速上升至5334米的急性高山病","authors":"William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD","doi":"10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4<!--> <!-->mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.43, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.10, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.214). ANOVA and <em>t</em>-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wilderness medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexamethasone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness during rapid ascent to 5334 m\",\"authors\":\"William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4<!--> <!-->mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.43, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.10, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.214). ANOVA and <em>t</em>-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wilderness medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 331-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wilderness medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953985994711335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wilderness medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953985994711335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
23名志愿者参加了一项双盲随机试验,在玻利维亚恰克拉塔亚山的一个避难所快速攀登期间,每12小时比较类固醇地塞米松4mg和安慰剂预防急性高原反应(AMS)。在72 h的时间内,受试者通过空中和陆地交通工具从海平面运送到5334 m。采用环境症状问卷的大脑评分进行评估,并采用AMS-C和AMS-R评分进行确认。经卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,高海拔6 ~ 8 h(第3天)地塞米松组发病人数明显少于安慰剂组(χ2 = 7.43, p = 0.01)。在高海拔20 h(第4天)后,组间对比降低(χ2 = 2.10, p = 0.214)。方差分析和t检验显示,尽管地塞米松组在第3天至第4天的平均累积得分增加了约82%,但在高海拔地区,地塞米松组的平均累积得分在第2天均显著低于安慰剂组(p = 0.01, p = 0.02)。我们的结论是,地塞米松每12小时4mg,虽然最初有效,但不足以持续预防5334 m的AMS症状。
Dexamethasone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness during rapid ascent to 5334 m
Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4 mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ2 = 7.43, p = 0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ2 = 2.10, p = 0.214). ANOVA and t-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (p = 0.01, p = 0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.