熊彼特型企业的创新:知识协作还是知识溢出?

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS
M. Belitski
{"title":"熊彼特型企业的创新:知识协作还是知识溢出?","authors":"M. Belitski","doi":"10.1561/0300000085-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the impact of knowledge collaboration and knowledge spillovers on the innovative performance of Schumpeterian-type firms. Building on the innovation and entrepreneurship literatures, it first examines the innovation strategies used by highly-innovative firms, which can involve knowledge spillovers, knowledge collaborations or both. Secondly, it demonstrates how and why the relationship between knowledge flows and innovative performance changes with geographical proximity between knowledge-source and knowledge-recipient firms and across industries. \n \nExternal collaboration may bestow a significant advantage for innovation, such as helping to leverage the lack of knowledge and technology and teaching skills, but at a cost – the involuntary knowledge outflows to external partners. The results have relevant implications for the academic community, national and European policy-makers, and managers in highly-innovative firms who may want to rethink their innovation strategy.","PeriodicalId":45990,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/0300000085-2","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation in Schumpeterian-type\\nFirms: Knowledge Collaboration or\\nKnowledge Spillover?\",\"authors\":\"M. Belitski\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/0300000085-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the impact of knowledge collaboration and knowledge spillovers on the innovative performance of Schumpeterian-type firms. Building on the innovation and entrepreneurship literatures, it first examines the innovation strategies used by highly-innovative firms, which can involve knowledge spillovers, knowledge collaborations or both. Secondly, it demonstrates how and why the relationship between knowledge flows and innovative performance changes with geographical proximity between knowledge-source and knowledge-recipient firms and across industries. \\n \\nExternal collaboration may bestow a significant advantage for innovation, such as helping to leverage the lack of knowledge and technology and teaching skills, but at a cost – the involuntary knowledge outflows to external partners. The results have relevant implications for the academic community, national and European policy-makers, and managers in highly-innovative firms who may want to rethink their innovation strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/0300000085-2\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000085-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000085-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文主要研究了知识协作和知识溢出对熊彼特型企业创新绩效的影响。在创新和创业文献的基础上,本文首先考察了高度创新的企业所使用的创新战略,这些战略可能涉及知识溢出、知识合作或两者兼而有之。其次,本文论证了知识流动与创新绩效之间的关系如何以及为什么会随着知识来源企业与知识接收企业之间以及不同行业之间的地理距离而变化。外部合作可能会给创新带来显著的优势,例如帮助利用知识、技术和教学技能的缺乏,但这是有代价的——非自愿的知识外流到外部合作伙伴。研究结果对学术界、国家和欧洲的政策制定者以及高度创新企业的管理者都有相关的启示,他们可能想要重新思考他们的创新战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovation in Schumpeterian-type Firms: Knowledge Collaboration or Knowledge Spillover?
This study focuses on the impact of knowledge collaboration and knowledge spillovers on the innovative performance of Schumpeterian-type firms. Building on the innovation and entrepreneurship literatures, it first examines the innovation strategies used by highly-innovative firms, which can involve knowledge spillovers, knowledge collaborations or both. Secondly, it demonstrates how and why the relationship between knowledge flows and innovative performance changes with geographical proximity between knowledge-source and knowledge-recipient firms and across industries. External collaboration may bestow a significant advantage for innovation, such as helping to leverage the lack of knowledge and technology and teaching skills, but at a cost – the involuntary knowledge outflows to external partners. The results have relevant implications for the academic community, national and European policy-makers, and managers in highly-innovative firms who may want to rethink their innovation strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship publishes survey and tutorial articles in the following topics: - Nascent and start-up entrepreneurs - Opportunity recognition - New venture creation process - Business formation - Firm ownership - Market value and firm growth - Franchising - Managerial characteristics and behavior of entrepreneurs - Strategic alliances and networks - Government programs and public policy - Gender and ethnicity - New business financing - Business angels - Family-owned firms - Management structure, governance and performance - Corporate entrepreneurship - High technology - Small business and economic growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信