回复Guala和Gallotti

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2016-03-23 DOI:10.1515/jso-2016-0002

B. Epstein

{"title":"回复Guala和Gallotti","authors":"B. Epstein","doi":"10.1515/jso-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article responds to comments by Francesco Guala and Mattia Gallotti on The Ant Trap. In the replies, I address the relation of new advances in cognitive science to the study of collective attitudes, clarify distinct questions we might ask about grounding and about anchoring in social ontology, defend various forms of pluralism about grounds and about anchors, and discuss the type-token distinction as it applies to social entities.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"2 1","pages":"159 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2016-0002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replies to Guala and Gallotti\",\"authors\":\"B. Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jso-2016-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article responds to comments by Francesco Guala and Mattia Gallotti on The Ant Trap. In the replies, I address the relation of new advances in cognitive science to the study of collective attitudes, clarify distinct questions we might ask about grounding and about anchoring in social ontology, defend various forms of pluralism about grounds and about anchors, and discuss the type-token distinction as it applies to social entities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2016-0002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Ontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文回应了Francesco Guala和Mattia Gallotti对《蚂蚁陷阱》的评论。在回复中，我讨论了认知科学的新进展与集体态度研究的关系，澄清了我们可能会问的关于社会本体论中的基础和锚定的不同问题，捍卫了关于基础和锚定的各种形式的多元主义，并讨论了适用于社会实体的类型-标记区分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Replies to Guala and Gallotti

Abstract This article responds to comments by Francesco Guala and Mattia Gallotti on The Ant Trap. In the replies, I address the relation of new advances in cognitive science to the study of collective attitudes, clarify distinct questions we might ask about grounding and about anchoring in social ontology, defend various forms of pluralism about grounds and about anchors, and discuss the type-token distinction as it applies to social entities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Social Ontology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks