第五章:亚种是为了方便

J. Fitzpatrick
{"title":"第五章:亚种是为了方便","authors":"J. Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The century-long debate over the meaning and utility of the subspecies concept has produced spirited print but only superficial consensus. I suggest that genuine consensus about subspecies is an impossible goal, because trinomial epithets will inevitably be applied to a heterogeneous mix of evolutionary phenomena, thereby precluding genuine standardization of the concept. Populations that have intermediate levels of phenotypic differentiation and geographic isolation from one another often fall into a region I refer to as the \"zone of art,\" where even skilled experts can disagree about the validity of any one subspecific treatment. The trinomial system cannot accurately represent the kind of information now available about genetic and character variation across space. Instead, ever more accurate tools are being perfected for quantitative, standardized descriptions of variation. These analyses—not subspecies classifications—will keep providing new scientific insights into geographic variation. Eve...","PeriodicalId":54665,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Monographs","volume":"67 1","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 5: Subspecies are for Convenience\",\"authors\":\"J. Fitzpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The century-long debate over the meaning and utility of the subspecies concept has produced spirited print but only superficial consensus. I suggest that genuine consensus about subspecies is an impossible goal, because trinomial epithets will inevitably be applied to a heterogeneous mix of evolutionary phenomena, thereby precluding genuine standardization of the concept. Populations that have intermediate levels of phenotypic differentiation and geographic isolation from one another often fall into a region I refer to as the \\\"zone of art,\\\" where even skilled experts can disagree about the validity of any one subspecific treatment. The trinomial system cannot accurately represent the kind of information now available about genetic and character variation across space. Instead, ever more accurate tools are being perfected for quantitative, standardized descriptions of variation. These analyses—not subspecies classifications—will keep providing new scientific insights into geographic variation. Eve...\",\"PeriodicalId\":54665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornithological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"54-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornithological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

关于亚种概念的意义和效用的长达一个世纪的争论产生了热烈的印刷品,但只有表面的共识。我认为对亚种达成真正的共识是一个不可能的目标,因为三项式的称谓将不可避免地应用于异质混合的进化现象,从而阻碍了概念的真正标准化。具有中等水平表型分化和地理隔离的人群通常属于我称之为“艺术区域”的区域,即使是熟练的专家也可能对任何一种亚特异性治疗的有效性持不同意见。三项式系统不能准确地表示目前可获得的关于遗传和性状跨空间变异的信息。相反,更精确的工具正在完善,用于定量的、标准化的变异描述。这些分析——而不是亚种分类——将继续为地理变异提供新的科学见解。夜……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 5: Subspecies are for Convenience
Abstract The century-long debate over the meaning and utility of the subspecies concept has produced spirited print but only superficial consensus. I suggest that genuine consensus about subspecies is an impossible goal, because trinomial epithets will inevitably be applied to a heterogeneous mix of evolutionary phenomena, thereby precluding genuine standardization of the concept. Populations that have intermediate levels of phenotypic differentiation and geographic isolation from one another often fall into a region I refer to as the "zone of art," where even skilled experts can disagree about the validity of any one subspecific treatment. The trinomial system cannot accurately represent the kind of information now available about genetic and character variation across space. Instead, ever more accurate tools are being perfected for quantitative, standardized descriptions of variation. These analyses—not subspecies classifications—will keep providing new scientific insights into geographic variation. Eve...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信