重新分析Moffatt等人(2020)的数据:我们能从缺乏差异的情况中学到什么?

IF 3.1 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Collabra-Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1525/collabra.33059

Ladislas Nalborczyk

{"title":"重新分析Moffatt等人(2020)的数据:我们能从缺乏差异的情况中学到什么?","authors":"Ladislas Nalborczyk","doi":"10.1525/collabra.33059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moffatt et al. (2020) reported the results of an experiment (N = 26 in the final sample) comparing the facial electromyographic correlates of mental rumination and distraction, following an experimentally induced stressor. Based on the absence of significant difference (and BFs between 3.6 and 4.3) in the perioral muscular activity between the rumination and distraction conditions, Moffatt et al. (2020) concluded that self-reported inner experience was unrelated to peripheral muscular activity as assessed using surface electromyography. In this short commentary, we show that there is limited evidence for the main conclusion put forward by Moffatt et al. (2020), and we suggest ways forward, both from a theoretical and a methodological perspective. Complete source code, reproducible analyses, and figures are available at https://osf.io/ba3gk/.","PeriodicalId":45791,"journal":{"name":"Collabra-Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-analysing the Data From Moffatt et al. (2020): What Can We Learn From an Under-powered Absence of Difference?\",\"authors\":\"Ladislas Nalborczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/collabra.33059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moffatt et al. (2020) reported the results of an experiment (N = 26 in the final sample) comparing the facial electromyographic correlates of mental rumination and distraction, following an experimentally induced stressor. Based on the absence of significant difference (and BFs between 3.6 and 4.3) in the perioral muscular activity between the rumination and distraction conditions, Moffatt et al. (2020) concluded that self-reported inner experience was unrelated to peripheral muscular activity as assessed using surface electromyography. In this short commentary, we show that there is limited evidence for the main conclusion put forward by Moffatt et al. (2020), and we suggest ways forward, both from a theoretical and a methodological perspective. Complete source code, reproducible analyses, and figures are available at https://osf.io/ba3gk/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collabra-Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collabra-Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collabra-Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

Moffatt等人(2020)报告了一项实验的结果(最终样本中N = 26)，比较了实验诱导的应激源后精神反刍和分心的面部肌电图相关性。Moffatt et al.(2020)基于反刍和分心条件下口周肌肉活动没有显著差异(BFs在3.6和4.3之间)，得出结论，使用表面肌电图评估，自我报告的内心体验与周围肌肉活动无关。在这篇简短的评论中，我们表明Moffatt等人(2020)提出的主要结论证据有限，我们从理论和方法论的角度提出了前进的方向。完整的源代码，可复制的分析和图表可在https://osf.io/ba3gk/。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Re-analysing the Data From Moffatt et al. (2020): What Can We Learn From an Under-powered Absence of Difference?

Moffatt et al. (2020) reported the results of an experiment (N = 26 in the final sample) comparing the facial electromyographic correlates of mental rumination and distraction, following an experimentally induced stressor. Based on the absence of significant difference (and BFs between 3.6 and 4.3) in the perioral muscular activity between the rumination and distraction conditions, Moffatt et al. (2020) concluded that self-reported inner experience was unrelated to peripheral muscular activity as assessed using surface electromyography. In this short commentary, we show that there is limited evidence for the main conclusion put forward by Moffatt et al. (2020), and we suggest ways forward, both from a theoretical and a methodological perspective. Complete source code, reproducible analyses, and figures are available at https://osf.io/ba3gk/.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Collabra-Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

4.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Collabra: Psychology has 7 sections representing the broad field of psychology, and a highlighted focus area of “Methodology and Research Practice.” Are: Cognitive Psychology Social Psychology Personality Psychology Clinical Psychology Developmental Psychology Organizational Behavior Methodology and Research Practice.