用项目反应理论模型衡量数字化教学创新

Q3 Social Sciences
F. Giambona, Marco Pitzalis, M. Porcu, Isabella Sulis
{"title":"用项目反应理论模型衡量数字化教学创新","authors":"F. Giambona, Marco Pitzalis, M. Porcu, Isabella Sulis","doi":"10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2016-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, two central questions have emerged in expert and academic debate on innovation policies in education. The first is the measurement of the effectiveness of innovation policies, the second regards the measurement itself and its methodological improvements. The problem of measurement is not only a methodological and technical issue; it is also a theoretical one. Every technical choice is made on the basis of a theoretical frame, so will have broad theoretical consequences. This article aims to focus on the problem of the definition and measurement of innovation in teaching activities. Its goal is mainly the application of the IRT methodology as a tool to assess propensity or attitudes in different domains pertaining to the use of ICT in schools. Our starting point is the hypothesis that the “propensity of innovation” may be defined as a latent variable defined by different dimensions. This paper considers the main results of a research project on digital teaching innovation carried out in 2013-2014. Digital teaching innovation was investigated through a sample survey addressed to teachers. An ad hoc questionnaire was used and Item Response Theory models were applied to analyse responses provided by teachers: propensity to digital teaching innovation was assessed with five indexes together with a further five related to other specific topics (e.g. the perception of the school climate, the school context). Finally, each indicator was related to potential explanatory variables in order to evaluate relationships between the salient characteristics of teachers and schools and the main dimensions of analysis.","PeriodicalId":37576,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Digital Teaching Innovation Using Item Response Theory Models\",\"authors\":\"F. Giambona, Marco Pitzalis, M. Porcu, Isabella Sulis\",\"doi\":\"10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2016-2-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last few years, two central questions have emerged in expert and academic debate on innovation policies in education. The first is the measurement of the effectiveness of innovation policies, the second regards the measurement itself and its methodological improvements. The problem of measurement is not only a methodological and technical issue; it is also a theoretical one. Every technical choice is made on the basis of a theoretical frame, so will have broad theoretical consequences. This article aims to focus on the problem of the definition and measurement of innovation in teaching activities. Its goal is mainly the application of the IRT methodology as a tool to assess propensity or attitudes in different domains pertaining to the use of ICT in schools. Our starting point is the hypothesis that the “propensity of innovation” may be defined as a latent variable defined by different dimensions. This paper considers the main results of a research project on digital teaching innovation carried out in 2013-2014. Digital teaching innovation was investigated through a sample survey addressed to teachers. An ad hoc questionnaire was used and Item Response Theory models were applied to analyse responses provided by teachers: propensity to digital teaching innovation was assessed with five indexes together with a further five related to other specific topics (e.g. the perception of the school climate, the school context). Finally, each indicator was related to potential explanatory variables in order to evaluate relationships between the salient characteristics of teachers and schools and the main dimensions of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2016-2-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2016-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,在专家和学术界关于教育创新政策的辩论中出现了两个核心问题。第一部分是创新政策有效性的度量,第二部分是度量本身及其方法的改进。测量问题不仅是一个方法和技术问题;这也是一个理论问题。每一个技术选择都是在理论框架的基础上做出的,因此会产生广泛的理论后果。本文旨在探讨教学活动创新的定义与衡量问题。其目标主要是应用信息和通信技术方法,作为一种工具,评估与学校使用信息和通信技术有关的不同领域的倾向或态度。我们的出发点是假设“创新倾向”可以定义为一个由不同维度定义的潜在变量。本文考虑了2013-2014年开展的数字化教学创新研究项目的主要成果。通过对教师的抽样调查,对数字化教学创新进行了调查。使用了一份临时问卷,并应用项目反应理论模型来分析教师提供的回答:使用五个指标以及与其他特定主题相关的另外五个指标(例如,对学校气候的感知,学校背景)来评估数字教学创新的倾向。最后,每个指标都与潜在的解释变量相关,以评估教师和学校的显著特征与分析的主要维度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Digital Teaching Innovation Using Item Response Theory Models
In the last few years, two central questions have emerged in expert and academic debate on innovation policies in education. The first is the measurement of the effectiveness of innovation policies, the second regards the measurement itself and its methodological improvements. The problem of measurement is not only a methodological and technical issue; it is also a theoretical one. Every technical choice is made on the basis of a theoretical frame, so will have broad theoretical consequences. This article aims to focus on the problem of the definition and measurement of innovation in teaching activities. Its goal is mainly the application of the IRT methodology as a tool to assess propensity or attitudes in different domains pertaining to the use of ICT in schools. Our starting point is the hypothesis that the “propensity of innovation” may be defined as a latent variable defined by different dimensions. This paper considers the main results of a research project on digital teaching innovation carried out in 2013-2014. Digital teaching innovation was investigated through a sample survey addressed to teachers. An ad hoc questionnaire was used and Item Response Theory models were applied to analyse responses provided by teachers: propensity to digital teaching innovation was assessed with five indexes together with a further five related to other specific topics (e.g. the perception of the school climate, the school context). Finally, each indicator was related to potential explanatory variables in order to evaluate relationships between the salient characteristics of teachers and schools and the main dimensions of analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Sociology of Education is a peer-reviewed academic journal published three times a year (February, June, October) and sponsored by the Educational Section of the Italian Sociological Association (AIS-EDU).The journal aims at presenting up-to-date, state of the art theoretical and empirical studies concerning socialization, education, and educational institutions, enlarging and deepening the mutual knowledge and collaboration between Italian and foreign scholars within a broad global perspective. Main topics are the meanings of education; socialization and its institutional loci; school and the university; human and social capital; lifelong education; educational actors and policy; immigration and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信