一幅画还是千字?问题长度和图形支持对在线测试成功率和辍学率的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ernesto Redondo, Joaquim Regot, David Fonseca, Francesc Valls, L. Giménez
{"title":"一幅画还是千字?问题长度和图形支持对在线测试成功率和辍学率的影响","authors":"Ernesto Redondo, Joaquim Regot, David Fonseca, Francesc Valls, L. Giménez","doi":"10.14201/EKS2016174111128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing popularity of automatically graded online tests, either as an evaluation or self-assessment tool in online or blended education, demands a review of how these questions are designed and delivered to their intended audience. This paper analyzes the results of over 20,000 pre-university mock online quizzes designed to train the students for the Spanish university admission test (known as “Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad” or “Selectividad”) in the technical drawing subject, corresponding to the June and September intakes of 2009 and 2015. The influence of two key aspects on the questions success and skip rates is assessed: (a) the presence or absence of illustration support and (b) the length of the question as a proxy of reading comprehension difficulty. The results support that the presence of an accompanying illustration in the questions result in fewer skipped questions and mode successful answers, while the length of the question has the opposite effect. The performance difference in the 6-year span is also discussed, showing a slight decline over time in the pass rates while the skip rates remain stable. When comparing both two intakes, corresponding to different academic profiles of students that passed the June exam and those who did not, the success ratio is unsurprisingly lower for the students in the second intake. These findings should help improving the design of online quizzes, including more visual content and/or rephrasing the questions to be more concise, to fit the requirements of students educated in a more visual environment of multimedia technologies.","PeriodicalId":45123,"journal":{"name":"Education in the Knowledge Society","volume":"17 1","pages":"111-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Una imagen o mil palabras? Influencia de la extensión de las preguntas y el soporte gráfico en las tasas de éxito y abandono de las pruebas en línea\",\"authors\":\"Ernesto Redondo, Joaquim Regot, David Fonseca, Francesc Valls, L. Giménez\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/EKS2016174111128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing popularity of automatically graded online tests, either as an evaluation or self-assessment tool in online or blended education, demands a review of how these questions are designed and delivered to their intended audience. This paper analyzes the results of over 20,000 pre-university mock online quizzes designed to train the students for the Spanish university admission test (known as “Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad” or “Selectividad”) in the technical drawing subject, corresponding to the June and September intakes of 2009 and 2015. The influence of two key aspects on the questions success and skip rates is assessed: (a) the presence or absence of illustration support and (b) the length of the question as a proxy of reading comprehension difficulty. The results support that the presence of an accompanying illustration in the questions result in fewer skipped questions and mode successful answers, while the length of the question has the opposite effect. The performance difference in the 6-year span is also discussed, showing a slight decline over time in the pass rates while the skip rates remain stable. When comparing both two intakes, corresponding to different academic profiles of students that passed the June exam and those who did not, the success ratio is unsurprisingly lower for the students in the second intake. These findings should help improving the design of online quizzes, including more visual content and/or rephrasing the questions to be more concise, to fit the requirements of students educated in a more visual environment of multimedia technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"111-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/EKS2016174111128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/EKS2016174111128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动评分的在线测试越来越受欢迎,无论是作为在线教育还是混合教育的评估或自我评估工具,都需要对这些问题的设计方式进行审查,并将其传递给目标受众。本文分析了2009年和2015年6月和9月入学的20000多份大学前模拟在线测试的结果,这些测试旨在培训学生参加西班牙大学入学考试(称为“Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad”或“Selectividad”)的技术制图科目。评估了两个关键方面对问题成功和跳过率的影响:(a)是否有插图支持和(b)问题的长度作为阅读理解难度的代理。结果支持,在问题中伴随插图的存在导致更少的跳过问题和模式成功的答案,而问题的长度有相反的效果。还讨论了6年跨度内的性能差异,表明随着时间的推移,通过率略有下降,而跳过率保持稳定。当比较两次入学的学生时,对应于通过6月考试和未通过考试的学生的不同学术背景,不出所料,第二次入学的学生的成功率较低。这些发现应该有助于改进在线测验的设计,包括更多的视觉内容和/或将问题改写得更简洁,以适应在多媒体技术的视觉化环境中接受教育的学生的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
¿Una imagen o mil palabras? Influencia de la extensión de las preguntas y el soporte gráfico en las tasas de éxito y abandono de las pruebas en línea
The growing popularity of automatically graded online tests, either as an evaluation or self-assessment tool in online or blended education, demands a review of how these questions are designed and delivered to their intended audience. This paper analyzes the results of over 20,000 pre-university mock online quizzes designed to train the students for the Spanish university admission test (known as “Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad” or “Selectividad”) in the technical drawing subject, corresponding to the June and September intakes of 2009 and 2015. The influence of two key aspects on the questions success and skip rates is assessed: (a) the presence or absence of illustration support and (b) the length of the question as a proxy of reading comprehension difficulty. The results support that the presence of an accompanying illustration in the questions result in fewer skipped questions and mode successful answers, while the length of the question has the opposite effect. The performance difference in the 6-year span is also discussed, showing a slight decline over time in the pass rates while the skip rates remain stable. When comparing both two intakes, corresponding to different academic profiles of students that passed the June exam and those who did not, the success ratio is unsurprisingly lower for the students in the second intake. These findings should help improving the design of online quizzes, including more visual content and/or rephrasing the questions to be more concise, to fit the requirements of students educated in a more visual environment of multimedia technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education in the Knowledge Society
Education in the Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
10.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信