{"title":"壁画画廊的美学和伦理责任(Zaspa/格但斯克，Lódz和Dulwich/伦敦收藏的比较分析)。","authors":"W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk","doi":"10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to draw attention to the aesthetic and ethical aspects of responsibility for creating mural galleries. The three examples – Monumental Art Collection in Gdańsk/Zaspa, Urban Forms Gallery in Łódź, Dulwich Outdoor Gallery in London – have common original aims, directly related to the current problems of districts or cities in which they were created. The analysis of these collections should help us answer the following questions: 1. What happened and when to make such a visually intense and massive interference in a public space as mural galleries possible at all? 2. Are collections of murals actually galleries or is the term “gallery′′ just a conceptual metaphor vo l.6 1 , n r6 . Ju ly th e 15 th , 2 01 9 IS BN : 1 13 973 65 4 PO LI S RE SE AR CH C EN TR E. U ni ve rs ita t d e Ba rc el on a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7 that facilitates actions taken in a public space? 3. What values – aesthetic, ethical, and correlated with them social, artistic, urban, cognitive, and educational values – can be associated with the phenomenon of murals? 4. Should we protect and restore murals or leave them to the “natural urban element”?","PeriodicalId":41149,"journal":{"name":"On the Waterfront","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aesthetic and Ethical Aspects of Responsibility for Mural Galleries (Comparative Analysis of Collections in Zaspa/Gdansk, Lódz and Dulwich/London).\",\"authors\":\"W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to draw attention to the aesthetic and ethical aspects of responsibility for creating mural galleries. The three examples – Monumental Art Collection in Gdańsk/Zaspa, Urban Forms Gallery in Łódź, Dulwich Outdoor Gallery in London – have common original aims, directly related to the current problems of districts or cities in which they were created. The analysis of these collections should help us answer the following questions: 1. What happened and when to make such a visually intense and massive interference in a public space as mural galleries possible at all? 2. Are collections of murals actually galleries or is the term “gallery′′ just a conceptual metaphor vo l.6 1 , n r6 . Ju ly th e 15 th , 2 01 9 IS BN : 1 13 973 65 4 PO LI S RE SE AR CH C EN TR E. U ni ve rs ita t d e Ba rc el on a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7 that facilitates actions taken in a public space? 3. What values – aesthetic, ethical, and correlated with them social, artistic, urban, cognitive, and educational values – can be associated with the phenomenon of murals? 4. Should we protect and restore murals or leave them to the “natural urban element”?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On the Waterfront\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On the Waterfront\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Waterfront","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章的目的是引起人们对创造壁画画廊责任的美学和伦理方面的关注。这三个例子——Gdańsk/Zaspa的纪念性艺术收藏，Łódź的城市形式画廊，伦敦的Dulwich户外画廊——都有共同的原始目标，直接关系到它们所创建的地区或城市的当前问题。对这些藏品的分析应该有助于我们回答以下问题:到底发生了什么，什么时候才有可能在壁画画廊这样的公共空间中制造如此强烈的视觉干扰?2. 壁画的集合实际上是画廊吗?或者“画廊”这个词只是一个概念性的隐喻?2009年7月15日9 IS BN: 1 13 973 65 4 PO LI S RE SE AR CH C EN TR e .在一个DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7，促进在公共空间采取的行动。3.什么价值——审美、伦理，以及与之相关的社会、艺术、城市、认知和教育价值——可以与壁画现象联系起来?4. 我们应该保护和修复壁画，还是把它们留给“自然的城市元素”?
Aesthetic and Ethical Aspects of Responsibility for Mural Galleries (Comparative Analysis of Collections in Zaspa/Gdansk, Lódz and Dulwich/London).
The aim of the article is to draw attention to the aesthetic and ethical aspects of responsibility for creating mural galleries. The three examples – Monumental Art Collection in Gdańsk/Zaspa, Urban Forms Gallery in Łódź, Dulwich Outdoor Gallery in London – have common original aims, directly related to the current problems of districts or cities in which they were created. The analysis of these collections should help us answer the following questions: 1. What happened and when to make such a visually intense and massive interference in a public space as mural galleries possible at all? 2. Are collections of murals actually galleries or is the term “gallery′′ just a conceptual metaphor vo l.6 1 , n r6 . Ju ly th e 15 th , 2 01 9 IS BN : 1 13 973 65 4 PO LI S RE SE AR CH C EN TR E. U ni ve rs ita t d e Ba rc el on a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2019.61.6.7 that facilitates actions taken in a public space? 3. What values – aesthetic, ethical, and correlated with them social, artistic, urban, cognitive, and educational values – can be associated with the phenomenon of murals? 4. Should we protect and restore murals or leave them to the “natural urban element”?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
