《法律的有罪不罚:责任与现代私营军事公司》述评

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Human Security Pub Date : 2016-04-11 DOI:10.12924/JOHS2016.12010035

Marcos Alan S. V. Ferreira

{"title":"《法律的有罪不罚:责任与现代私营军事公司》述评","authors":"Marcos Alan S. V. Ferreira","doi":"10.12924/JOHS2016.12010035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mercenaries and mercenarism are two points of concern for scholars studying the rules of war throughout history. Both in jus ad bellum (JAB) and jus in bellum (JIB) we can find a framework of international law crafted to impede the participation of individuals motivated to take part in hostilities to get private gain. Nevertheless, paradoxically, the problem is when corporations are supported by domestic law to perform serviced in ground combats abroad. In the latter case, Human Rights Law (HRL), International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Criminal Law (ICL) present numerous gaps that make it difficult to incriminate corporations, which perpetuate the impunity among private organizations involved in human rights violations in conflict zones.","PeriodicalId":39288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Security","volume":"12 1","pages":"35-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of 'Law's Impunity: Responsibility and the Modern Private Military Company'\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Alan S. V. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.12924/JOHS2016.12010035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mercenaries and mercenarism are two points of concern for scholars studying the rules of war throughout history. Both in jus ad bellum (JAB) and jus in bellum (JIB) we can find a framework of international law crafted to impede the participation of individuals motivated to take part in hostilities to get private gain. Nevertheless, paradoxically, the problem is when corporations are supported by domestic law to perform serviced in ground combats abroad. In the latter case, Human Rights Law (HRL), International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Criminal Law (ICL) present numerous gaps that make it difficult to incriminate corporations, which perpetuate the impunity among private organizations involved in human rights violations in conflict zones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Security\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"35-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12924/JOHS2016.12010035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/JOHS2016.12010035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

雇佣军和雇佣军制度是历史上研究战争规律的学者关注的两个问题。无论是在战时法(JAB)还是在战时法(JIB)中，我们都可以找到一个精心设计的国际法框架，以阻止有动机参加敌对行动以获得私人利益的个人的参与。然而，矛盾的是，问题是当企业得到国内法的支持，在国外的地面作战中提供服务时。在后一种情况下，人权法(HRL)、国际人道主义法(IHL)和国际刑法(ICL)存在许多空白，使公司难以定罪，从而使在冲突地区参与侵犯人权的私人组织长期逍遥法外。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Review of 'Law's Impunity: Responsibility and the Modern Private Military Company'

The mercenaries and mercenarism are two points of concern for scholars studying the rules of war throughout history. Both in jus ad bellum (JAB) and jus in bellum (JIB) we can find a framework of international law crafted to impede the participation of individuals motivated to take part in hostilities to get private gain. Nevertheless, paradoxically, the problem is when corporations are supported by domestic law to perform serviced in ground combats abroad. In the latter case, Human Rights Law (HRL), International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Criminal Law (ICL) present numerous gaps that make it difficult to incriminate corporations, which perpetuate the impunity among private organizations involved in human rights violations in conflict zones.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Human Security Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Journal of Human Security is to disseminate applied research into a secure and sustainable future for humanity. It continues the Australasian Journal of Human Security. Journal of Human Security endeavours to: - Provide a forum for researchers to foster interdisciplinary inquiry in broad human security issues such as track two diplomacy, ethnic conflict, terrorism, religious extremism, human rights, demographic change, population health, human ecology, sustainable economics and related areas. - Inform readers about upcoming events, ongoing and new research projects, trends and discussions, newly published monographs, and available scholarships. - Encourage a multidisciplinary approach to issues that have traditionally been viewed as mostly unidisciplinary. - Maintain an appeal to a wide readership with both high academic standards and close relevance to practice. - Meet international standards of excellence.