COVID-19对联邦制比较实践的影响:一些初步观察

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
R. Chattopadhyay, Felix Knüpling, Diana Chebenova
{"title":"COVID-19对联邦制比较实践的影响:一些初步观察","authors":"R. Chattopadhyay, Felix Knüpling, Diana Chebenova","doi":"10.12660/cgpc.v27n87.85110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented international event. The spread of the coronavirus – the biggest public health crisis in a century and the first of this scale in the globalized modern world – has prompted unparalleled responses by national governments. The proliferation of 24-hours news coverage and social media has allowed people across the world to follow, in real time, the unfolding and visible impacts of the pandemic. In 2020, as governments grappled with fluctuating waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of public policy varied among federal nations (the paper focuses on countries that are explicitly and constitutionally federal, and countries with governance systems in which governance powers and responsibilities are devolved from the central level to the subnational level). Federal countries such as Australia and Canada managed to keep mortality low, whereas others such as Brazil, Spain and the United States suffered some of the highest numbers of fatalities anywhere around world, both in absolute and relative terms (Kontis et al. 2020, 1919-1928; Brunner et al. 2020; Ritchie et al. 2020)","PeriodicalId":41080,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on the comparative practice of federalism: Some preliminary observations\",\"authors\":\"R. Chattopadhyay, Felix Knüpling, Diana Chebenova\",\"doi\":\"10.12660/cgpc.v27n87.85110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented international event. The spread of the coronavirus – the biggest public health crisis in a century and the first of this scale in the globalized modern world – has prompted unparalleled responses by national governments. The proliferation of 24-hours news coverage and social media has allowed people across the world to follow, in real time, the unfolding and visible impacts of the pandemic. In 2020, as governments grappled with fluctuating waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of public policy varied among federal nations (the paper focuses on countries that are explicitly and constitutionally federal, and countries with governance systems in which governance powers and responsibilities are devolved from the central level to the subnational level). Federal countries such as Australia and Canada managed to keep mortality low, whereas others such as Brazil, Spain and the United States suffered some of the highest numbers of fatalities anywhere around world, both in absolute and relative terms (Kontis et al. 2020, 1919-1928; Brunner et al. 2020; Ritchie et al. 2020)\",\"PeriodicalId\":41080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v27n87.85110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v27n87.85110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行是一场前所未有的国际事件。冠状病毒的传播——一个世纪以来最大的公共卫生危机,也是全球化的现代世界中第一次如此规模的公共卫生危机——促使各国政府做出了前所未有的反应。24小时新闻报道和社交媒体的激增,使世界各地的人们能够实时关注疫情的发展和明显影响。2020年,随着各国政府努力应对COVID-19大流行的波动浪潮,公共政策的有效性在联邦制国家之间存在差异(本文重点关注在宪法上明确实行联邦制的国家,以及治理权力和责任从中央一级下放到地方一级的治理体系国家)。澳大利亚和加拿大等联邦国家设法将死亡率保持在较低水平,而巴西、西班牙和美国等其他国家的死亡率在绝对和相对意义上都是世界上最高的(Kontis et al. 2020, 1919-1928;Brunner et al. 2020;Ritchie et al. 2020)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 on the comparative practice of federalism: Some preliminary observations
The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented international event. The spread of the coronavirus – the biggest public health crisis in a century and the first of this scale in the globalized modern world – has prompted unparalleled responses by national governments. The proliferation of 24-hours news coverage and social media has allowed people across the world to follow, in real time, the unfolding and visible impacts of the pandemic. In 2020, as governments grappled with fluctuating waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of public policy varied among federal nations (the paper focuses on countries that are explicitly and constitutionally federal, and countries with governance systems in which governance powers and responsibilities are devolved from the central level to the subnational level). Federal countries such as Australia and Canada managed to keep mortality low, whereas others such as Brazil, Spain and the United States suffered some of the highest numbers of fatalities anywhere around world, both in absolute and relative terms (Kontis et al. 2020, 1919-1928; Brunner et al. 2020; Ritchie et al. 2020)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania
Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信