管理人员对巴西社会企业和公共部门之间伙伴关系的看法

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Ana Luiza Terra Costa Mathias, R. M. Fischer
{"title":"管理人员对巴西社会企业和公共部门之间伙伴关系的看法","authors":"Ana Luiza Terra Costa Mathias, R. M. Fischer","doi":"10.12660/cgpc.v28.85884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social enterprises adopt hybrid organizational models and offer new possibilities for cross-sector collaborationbetween business and philanthropic sectors. However, there is a lack of research on partnerships involving socialenterprises. This study examined the benefits and challenges of cross-sector partnerships between social enterprises and public sector organizations in Brazil. In-depth interviews with six managers of three partnerships revealed that social enterprises and public sector managers perceived “visibility” as a key benefit of the partnerships. However, both groups identified “budget constraints,” “differences in work logic and pace,” “lack of project continuity,”and “complex approval processes” as significant challenges. These findings suggest that many of the benefits and challenges previously identified in partnerships between traditional sector organizations also apply to cross-sector partnerships involving social enterprises. The study contributes to understanding the potential of these cross-sector partnerships and highlights the need for further research in this area.","PeriodicalId":41080,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managers’ perceptions of partnerships between social enterprises and the public sector in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Ana Luiza Terra Costa Mathias, R. M. Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.12660/cgpc.v28.85884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social enterprises adopt hybrid organizational models and offer new possibilities for cross-sector collaborationbetween business and philanthropic sectors. However, there is a lack of research on partnerships involving socialenterprises. This study examined the benefits and challenges of cross-sector partnerships between social enterprises and public sector organizations in Brazil. In-depth interviews with six managers of three partnerships revealed that social enterprises and public sector managers perceived “visibility” as a key benefit of the partnerships. However, both groups identified “budget constraints,” “differences in work logic and pace,” “lack of project continuity,”and “complex approval processes” as significant challenges. These findings suggest that many of the benefits and challenges previously identified in partnerships between traditional sector organizations also apply to cross-sector partnerships involving social enterprises. The study contributes to understanding the potential of these cross-sector partnerships and highlights the need for further research in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v28.85884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v28.85884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

社会企业采用混合组织模式,为商业和慈善部门之间的跨部门合作提供了新的可能性。然而,关于社会企业参与伙伴关系的研究还很缺乏。本研究考察了巴西社会企业和公共部门组织之间跨部门伙伴关系的好处和挑战。对三个伙伴关系的六位管理者的深入访谈显示,社会企业和公共部门管理者认为“可见性”是伙伴关系的一个关键好处。然而,两组都认为“预算限制”、“工作逻辑和速度的差异”、“缺乏项目连续性”和“复杂的批准过程”是重大的挑战。这些发现表明,以前在传统部门组织之间的伙伴关系中确定的许多好处和挑战也适用于涉及社会企业的跨部门伙伴关系。这项研究有助于了解这些跨部门伙伴关系的潜力,并强调了在这一领域进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managers’ perceptions of partnerships between social enterprises and the public sector in Brazil
Social enterprises adopt hybrid organizational models and offer new possibilities for cross-sector collaborationbetween business and philanthropic sectors. However, there is a lack of research on partnerships involving socialenterprises. This study examined the benefits and challenges of cross-sector partnerships between social enterprises and public sector organizations in Brazil. In-depth interviews with six managers of three partnerships revealed that social enterprises and public sector managers perceived “visibility” as a key benefit of the partnerships. However, both groups identified “budget constraints,” “differences in work logic and pace,” “lack of project continuity,”and “complex approval processes” as significant challenges. These findings suggest that many of the benefits and challenges previously identified in partnerships between traditional sector organizations also apply to cross-sector partnerships involving social enterprises. The study contributes to understanding the potential of these cross-sector partnerships and highlights the need for further research in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania
Cadernos Gestao Publica e Cidadania PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信