身份陷阱:如何看待种族与警务

Q2 Social Sciences
P. A. Goff
{"title":"身份陷阱:如何看待种族与警务","authors":"P. A. Goff","doi":"10.1177/237946151600200203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the summer of 2014, Americans have seen more videos of violent interactions between police and non-Whites than ever before. While the interpretation of some specific incidents remains contentious and data on police use of force are scant, there is evidence that racial disparities in policing exist even when considering racial disparities in crime. The traditional civil rights model of institutional reform assumes that racial bigotry is the primary cause of these disparities; it attempts to address problems through adversarial litigation, protest, and education. This article offers an expansion of that model–one based on insights from behavioral science—that facilitates a less adversarial approach to reform and allows one to be agnostic about the role of racial bigotry. The new behavioral insights model focuses on identifying the contexts—called identity traps—that can escalate negative interactions between police and communities, as well as ways to interrupt them.","PeriodicalId":36971,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science and Policy","volume":"2 1","pages":"11 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identity Traps: How to Think about Race & Policing\",\"authors\":\"P. A. Goff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/237946151600200203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the summer of 2014, Americans have seen more videos of violent interactions between police and non-Whites than ever before. While the interpretation of some specific incidents remains contentious and data on police use of force are scant, there is evidence that racial disparities in policing exist even when considering racial disparities in crime. The traditional civil rights model of institutional reform assumes that racial bigotry is the primary cause of these disparities; it attempts to address problems through adversarial litigation, protest, and education. This article offers an expansion of that model–one based on insights from behavioral science—that facilitates a less adversarial approach to reform and allows one to be agnostic about the role of racial bigotry. The new behavioral insights model focuses on identifying the contexts—called identity traps—that can escalate negative interactions between police and communities, as well as ways to interrupt them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Science and Policy\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"11 - 22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Science and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151600200203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Science and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151600200203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

自2014年夏天以来,美国人看到的警察与非白人之间暴力互动的视频比以往任何时候都多。虽然对某些具体事件的解释仍然存在争议,而且关于警察使用武力的数据也很少,但有证据表明,即使考虑到犯罪方面的种族差异,警务方面的种族差异也存在。制度改革的传统民权模式假定种族偏见是这些差异的主要原因;它试图通过对抗性诉讼、抗议和教育来解决问题。本文对这一模型进行了扩展——一种基于行为科学的洞见的模型,它促进了一种较少对抗性的改革方法,并允许人们对种族偏见的作用持不可知论态度。新的行为洞察模型侧重于识别可能加剧警察和社区之间负面互动的环境,即所谓的身份陷阱,以及中断这种互动的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identity Traps: How to Think about Race & Policing
Since the summer of 2014, Americans have seen more videos of violent interactions between police and non-Whites than ever before. While the interpretation of some specific incidents remains contentious and data on police use of force are scant, there is evidence that racial disparities in policing exist even when considering racial disparities in crime. The traditional civil rights model of institutional reform assumes that racial bigotry is the primary cause of these disparities; it attempts to address problems through adversarial litigation, protest, and education. This article offers an expansion of that model–one based on insights from behavioral science—that facilitates a less adversarial approach to reform and allows one to be agnostic about the role of racial bigotry. The new behavioral insights model focuses on identifying the contexts—called identity traps—that can escalate negative interactions between police and communities, as well as ways to interrupt them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Science and Policy
Behavioral Science and Policy Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信