职业与组织对参照群体认同的影响

C. L. Kronus
{"title":"职业与组织对参照群体认同的影响","authors":"C. L. Kronus","doi":"10.1177/003803857600300303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two models of influence on reference-group identification were tested; the professional model that posits that occupational members retain an enduring stable identity established via their socialization experience was compared to the situational model, which emphasizes the resocializing pressures of the work situation. The pharmacy occupation provides a chance to compare occupational versus organizational effects on reference group identity because of the diversity in role orientations (business and professional) and work settings. Data from a population of pharmacists in a middle sized urban area strongly support the situational model. Reference group identity follows the power structure of the work setting as hospital pharmacists identified with physicians, while neighborhood pharmacists displayed a colleague-identity and chain store pharmacists rejected both occupational groups to identify with clients. Focusing on the power hierarchy of the work setting accounts for the diverse findings of both professional and situational models. Only in settings where the occupation dominates is identity colleague-based. Suggestions for revamping the outdated professional model to take into consideration the changed employment settings are offered.","PeriodicalId":85554,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of work and occupations","volume":"3 1","pages":"303 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/003803857600300303","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Versus Organizational Influences on Reference Group Identification\",\"authors\":\"C. L. Kronus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/003803857600300303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two models of influence on reference-group identification were tested; the professional model that posits that occupational members retain an enduring stable identity established via their socialization experience was compared to the situational model, which emphasizes the resocializing pressures of the work situation. The pharmacy occupation provides a chance to compare occupational versus organizational effects on reference group identity because of the diversity in role orientations (business and professional) and work settings. Data from a population of pharmacists in a middle sized urban area strongly support the situational model. Reference group identity follows the power structure of the work setting as hospital pharmacists identified with physicians, while neighborhood pharmacists displayed a colleague-identity and chain store pharmacists rejected both occupational groups to identify with clients. Focusing on the power hierarchy of the work setting accounts for the diverse findings of both professional and situational models. Only in settings where the occupation dominates is identity colleague-based. Suggestions for revamping the outdated professional model to take into consideration the changed employment settings are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of work and occupations\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/003803857600300303\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of work and occupations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857600300303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of work and occupations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857600300303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

对参照群体识别的两个影响模型进行了检验;假设职业成员通过其社会化经验保持持久稳定身份的职业模型与强调工作情境再社会化压力的情境模型进行了比较。由于角色定位(商业和专业)和工作环境的多样性,药房职业提供了一个比较职业与组织对参考群体认同的影响的机会。来自一个中等城市地区的药剂师群体的数据有力地支持了情境模型。参考群体认同遵循工作设置的权力结构,医院药剂师认同医师,而社区药剂师则表现出同事认同,连锁店药剂师拒绝这两个职业群体来认同客户。专注于工作设置的权力层次解释了专业模型和情境模型的不同发现。只有在职业占主导地位的环境中,身份才以同事为基础。针对就业环境的变化,提出了改进过时的专业模式的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational Versus Organizational Influences on Reference Group Identification
Two models of influence on reference-group identification were tested; the professional model that posits that occupational members retain an enduring stable identity established via their socialization experience was compared to the situational model, which emphasizes the resocializing pressures of the work situation. The pharmacy occupation provides a chance to compare occupational versus organizational effects on reference group identity because of the diversity in role orientations (business and professional) and work settings. Data from a population of pharmacists in a middle sized urban area strongly support the situational model. Reference group identity follows the power structure of the work setting as hospital pharmacists identified with physicians, while neighborhood pharmacists displayed a colleague-identity and chain store pharmacists rejected both occupational groups to identify with clients. Focusing on the power hierarchy of the work setting accounts for the diverse findings of both professional and situational models. Only in settings where the occupation dominates is identity colleague-based. Suggestions for revamping the outdated professional model to take into consideration the changed employment settings are offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信