{"title":"成为克利奥帕特拉","authors":"David Lucking, David Lucking","doi":"10.1177/01847678221094640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the ramifications of the word ‘become’ as it is deployed in Antony and Cleopatra, the term being invested with several distinct meanings which Shakespeare pursues the implications of and at the same time plays off against one another. It is argued that the play is deeply concerned with questions of an ontological nature, and that the contraposition between the rival perspectives of Rome and Egypt reflects a tension between the different conceptions of being, becoming, and identity articulated within it.","PeriodicalId":42648,"journal":{"name":"CAHIERS ELISABETHAINS","volume":"76 1","pages":"152 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Becoming Cleopatra\",\"authors\":\"David Lucking, David Lucking\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01847678221094640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates the ramifications of the word ‘become’ as it is deployed in Antony and Cleopatra, the term being invested with several distinct meanings which Shakespeare pursues the implications of and at the same time plays off against one another. It is argued that the play is deeply concerned with questions of an ontological nature, and that the contraposition between the rival perspectives of Rome and Egypt reflects a tension between the different conceptions of being, becoming, and identity articulated within it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CAHIERS ELISABETHAINS\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"152 - 163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CAHIERS ELISABETHAINS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01847678221094640\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAHIERS ELISABETHAINS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01847678221094640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article investigates the ramifications of the word ‘become’ as it is deployed in Antony and Cleopatra, the term being invested with several distinct meanings which Shakespeare pursues the implications of and at the same time plays off against one another. It is argued that the play is deeply concerned with questions of an ontological nature, and that the contraposition between the rival perspectives of Rome and Egypt reflects a tension between the different conceptions of being, becoming, and identity articulated within it.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
