{"title":"反常的形象:一个认知的反讽过程?","authors":"Clarissa Slesar","doi":"10.1167/5.8.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wegner and colleagues found an ironic hyperaccessibility to thoughts subjects were instructed to suppress under conditions of high cognitive load which they called The Ironic Effect. Wegner proposed that the Ironic Process underlying this effect entails the integration of two parallel processes: an effortful cognitive process which searches for distractors, and an automatic process which monitors the occurrence of the forbidden target thought (Wegner et al., 1987). We asked the question: Is there a perceptual analogue to the Ironic Effect?","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"3 1","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perversible Figures: An Ironic Process in Perception?\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa Slesar\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/5.8.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wegner and colleagues found an ironic hyperaccessibility to thoughts subjects were instructed to suppress under conditions of high cognitive load which they called The Ironic Effect. Wegner proposed that the Ironic Process underlying this effect entails the integration of two parallel processes: an effortful cognitive process which searches for distractors, and an automatic process which monitors the occurrence of the forbidden target thought (Wegner et al., 1987). We asked the question: Is there a perceptual analogue to the Ironic Effect?\",\"PeriodicalId\":30144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"109-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
韦格纳和他的同事们发现，在高认知负荷的条件下，受试者被指示抑制的想法具有反讽性，他们称之为“反讽效应”。Wegner提出，这种效应背后的讽刺过程需要两个平行过程的整合:一个是寻找干扰物的努力认知过程，另一个是监控被禁止的目标思想出现的自动过程(Wegner et al.， 1987)。我们提出了这样一个问题:是否存在与讽刺效应类似的感知?
Perversible Figures: An Ironic Process in Perception?
Wegner and colleagues found an ironic hyperaccessibility to thoughts subjects were instructed to suppress under conditions of high cognitive load which they called The Ironic Effect. Wegner proposed that the Ironic Process underlying this effect entails the integration of two parallel processes: an effortful cognitive process which searches for distractors, and an automatic process which monitors the occurrence of the forbidden target thought (Wegner et al., 1987). We asked the question: Is there a perceptual analogue to the Ironic Effect?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
