I. Orynyak, Vladyslav Marchenko, R. Mazuryk, A. Oryniak
{"title":"承压管道轴表面缺陷极限载荷公式的目标模型误差确定","authors":"I. Orynyak, Vladyslav Marchenko, R. Mazuryk, A. Oryniak","doi":"10.1115/1.4055008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There are dozens of formulas in literature and standards for residual strength calculation of the pressurized ductile pipes with axial rectangular defect. Their accuracy is usually characterized by so called “model error” notion. The latter is established as the averaged deviance of experimental data from the calculated results. In fact, the determined in such way model error is partly related to the validity and range of the chosen experimental data. The idea of our work is to introduce the notion of “targeted model error”. It is expected to characterize the accuracy of given formula for the particular defect only with given ratio of its dimensions, which is named as the “point of interest”. So, every experiment can give the contribution to the targeted model error according to its weight on the point of interest. These weights are subjectively established based on the difference between the dimensionless residual strengths calculated for the point of interest and for the real defect dimensions of the considered experiment. Practical examples of determination of the targeted model errors are performed for the ratios of the defect depth to wall thickness equal to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 for three well-known formulas - ASME, PPCORC and O-formula.","PeriodicalId":50080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Model Error Determination for Limit Load Formulas for Axial Surface Defect in a Pressurized Pipe\",\"authors\":\"I. Orynyak, Vladyslav Marchenko, R. Mazuryk, A. Oryniak\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4055008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There are dozens of formulas in literature and standards for residual strength calculation of the pressurized ductile pipes with axial rectangular defect. Their accuracy is usually characterized by so called “model error” notion. The latter is established as the averaged deviance of experimental data from the calculated results. In fact, the determined in such way model error is partly related to the validity and range of the chosen experimental data. The idea of our work is to introduce the notion of “targeted model error”. It is expected to characterize the accuracy of given formula for the particular defect only with given ratio of its dimensions, which is named as the “point of interest”. So, every experiment can give the contribution to the targeted model error according to its weight on the point of interest. These weights are subjectively established based on the difference between the dimensionless residual strengths calculated for the point of interest and for the real defect dimensions of the considered experiment. Practical examples of determination of the targeted model errors are performed for the ratios of the defect depth to wall thickness equal to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 for three well-known formulas - ASME, PPCORC and O-formula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Targeted Model Error Determination for Limit Load Formulas for Axial Surface Defect in a Pressurized Pipe
There are dozens of formulas in literature and standards for residual strength calculation of the pressurized ductile pipes with axial rectangular defect. Their accuracy is usually characterized by so called “model error” notion. The latter is established as the averaged deviance of experimental data from the calculated results. In fact, the determined in such way model error is partly related to the validity and range of the chosen experimental data. The idea of our work is to introduce the notion of “targeted model error”. It is expected to characterize the accuracy of given formula for the particular defect only with given ratio of its dimensions, which is named as the “point of interest”. So, every experiment can give the contribution to the targeted model error according to its weight on the point of interest. These weights are subjectively established based on the difference between the dimensionless residual strengths calculated for the point of interest and for the real defect dimensions of the considered experiment. Practical examples of determination of the targeted model errors are performed for the ratios of the defect depth to wall thickness equal to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 for three well-known formulas - ASME, PPCORC and O-formula.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology is the premier publication for the highest-quality research and interpretive reports on the design, analysis, materials, fabrication, construction, inspection, operation, and failure prevention of pressure vessels, piping, pipelines, power and heating boilers, heat exchangers, reaction vessels, pumps, valves, and other pressure and temperature-bearing components, as well as the nondestructive evaluation of critical components in mechanical engineering applications. Not only does the Journal cover all topics dealing with the design and analysis of pressure vessels, piping, and components, but it also contains discussions of their related codes and standards.
Applicable pressure technology areas of interest include: Dynamic and seismic analysis; Equipment qualification; Fabrication; Welding processes and integrity; Operation of vessels and piping; Fatigue and fracture prediction; Finite and boundary element methods; Fluid-structure interaction; High pressure engineering; Elevated temperature analysis and design; Inelastic analysis; Life extension; Lifeline earthquake engineering; PVP materials and their property databases; NDE; safety and reliability; Verification and qualification of software.