口腔念珠菌病:传统方法与多重聚合酶链反应鉴定菌种的比较。

G. Liguori, V. Di Onofrio, A. Lucariello, F. Gallé, G. Signoriello, G. Colella, M. D’Amora, F. Rossano
{"title":"口腔念珠菌病:传统方法与多重聚合酶链反应鉴定菌种的比较。","authors":"G. Liguori, V. Di Onofrio, A. Lucariello, F. Gallé, G. Signoriello, G. Colella, M. D’Amora, F. Rossano","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/AIM\nOral candidiasis is the most common fungal infection in dental practice, and is caused by yeasts that are normally present in the endogenous flora.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTo evaluate a rapid diagnostic method for identification of Candida oral isolates, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out on colonies and on oral rinse solutions from 95 subjects with suspected oral candidiasis and results were compared with those from seven commonly used phenotypic identification systems.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween four and nine species were characterized in the samples by the phenotypic methods. PCR identified the same species in 60 (74%) samples from both colony and oral rinse solutions. Statistical analysis, carried out only for the three most frequently isolated species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida tropicalis), showed good concordance in the comparison of multiplex PCR with API 20C AUX and with the Rapid Yeast Identification Panel; conversely, significant differences were registered in the comparison between the molecular method and other phenotypic systems, including four chromogenic media and the automated system Vitek2.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nMultiplex PCR was rapid and effective in the identification of Candida species and allowed the detection of more than one species in the same sample.","PeriodicalId":19630,"journal":{"name":"Oral microbiology and immunology","volume":"24 1 1","pages":"76-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral candidiasis: a comparison between conventional methods and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for species identification.\",\"authors\":\"G. Liguori, V. Di Onofrio, A. Lucariello, F. Gallé, G. Signoriello, G. Colella, M. D’Amora, F. Rossano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND/AIM\\nOral candidiasis is the most common fungal infection in dental practice, and is caused by yeasts that are normally present in the endogenous flora.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nTo evaluate a rapid diagnostic method for identification of Candida oral isolates, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out on colonies and on oral rinse solutions from 95 subjects with suspected oral candidiasis and results were compared with those from seven commonly used phenotypic identification systems.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nBetween four and nine species were characterized in the samples by the phenotypic methods. PCR identified the same species in 60 (74%) samples from both colony and oral rinse solutions. Statistical analysis, carried out only for the three most frequently isolated species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida tropicalis), showed good concordance in the comparison of multiplex PCR with API 20C AUX and with the Rapid Yeast Identification Panel; conversely, significant differences were registered in the comparison between the molecular method and other phenotypic systems, including four chromogenic media and the automated system Vitek2.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nMultiplex PCR was rapid and effective in the identification of Candida species and allowed the detection of more than one species in the same sample.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral microbiology and immunology\",\"volume\":\"24 1 1\",\"pages\":\"76-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral microbiology and immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00447.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

背景/非念珠菌病是牙科实践中最常见的真菌感染,由通常存在于内源性菌群中的酵母菌引起。方法对95例口腔念珠菌病疑似患者的菌落和口腔冲洗液进行多重聚合酶链反应(PCR),并对7种常用表型鉴定系统的结果进行比较,评价一种快速鉴定口腔念珠菌的方法。结果用表型方法鉴定出4 ~ 9种。从菌落和口腔冲洗液中提取的60份(74%)样品经PCR鉴定出相同的菌种。统计分析仅对三种最常见的分离种(白色念珠菌、光滑念珠菌和热带念珠菌)进行了统计分析,与API 20C AUX和快速酵母鉴定面板的多重PCR比较显示出良好的一致性;相反,在分子方法与其他表型系统(包括四种显色介质和自动系统Vitek2)之间的比较中发现了显著差异。多重PCR对念珠菌种类的鉴定是快速有效的,并且可以在同一样品中检测到多个种类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral candidiasis: a comparison between conventional methods and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for species identification.
BACKGROUND/AIM Oral candidiasis is the most common fungal infection in dental practice, and is caused by yeasts that are normally present in the endogenous flora. METHODS To evaluate a rapid diagnostic method for identification of Candida oral isolates, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out on colonies and on oral rinse solutions from 95 subjects with suspected oral candidiasis and results were compared with those from seven commonly used phenotypic identification systems. RESULTS Between four and nine species were characterized in the samples by the phenotypic methods. PCR identified the same species in 60 (74%) samples from both colony and oral rinse solutions. Statistical analysis, carried out only for the three most frequently isolated species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida tropicalis), showed good concordance in the comparison of multiplex PCR with API 20C AUX and with the Rapid Yeast Identification Panel; conversely, significant differences were registered in the comparison between the molecular method and other phenotypic systems, including four chromogenic media and the automated system Vitek2. DISCUSSION Multiplex PCR was rapid and effective in the identification of Candida species and allowed the detection of more than one species in the same sample.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信