Vivek Soundararajan, Miriam Wilhelm, Andrew Crane, Mark Pagell
{"title":"2021年新兴话语孵化器:管理供应链中的工作条件:走向体面劳动","authors":"Vivek Soundararajan, Miriam Wilhelm, Andrew Crane, Mark Pagell","doi":"10.1111/jscm.12235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The topic for <i>JSCM</i>'s fourth emerging discourse incubator (EDI) is Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Toward Decent Work. Decent work refers to “opportunities for work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for families, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men” (ILO, 2019). The goal of decent work for all is enshrined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals as SDG 8, “Decent work and Economic Growth”. Yet in many supply chains this goal remains elusive. For example, there is evidence that the supply chains of several prominent companies, such as Amazon, have not adequately addressed worker safety concerns in regard to the COVID-19 virus.</p><p>For decades, studies on decent work across disciplines like development studies, geography, political science, sociology and management have focused on various topics including barriers to decent work, causes of indecent work, and measures to improve and maintain decent work (e.g. Anker et al., <span>2003</span>; Barrientos, <span>2013</span>; Blustein et al., <span>2016</span>; Grandey et al., <span>2015</span>; Sehnbruch et al., <span>2015</span>). Insights from these studies have informed policies and practices across the globe, many of them focused on the governance of global supply chains.</p><p>Research on working conditions in SCM is often conducted under the broader theme of sustainable supply chain management. Under this theme, research has focused on topics such as the supplier capabilities for social management (Huq et al., <span>2016</span>), occupational health & safety (e.g. Cantor et al., <span>2017</span>; Pagell et al., <span>2018</span>), including that of emerging economy suppliers (Hamja et al., 2019), and the role of intermediaries in managing suppliers’ social practices (Soundararajan & Brammer, <span>2018</span>; Wilhelm et al., <span>2016</span>).</p><p>Nevertheless, a closer look at these studies suggests that decent work and SCM scholarship have had very little interaction. Therefore, this emerging discourse incubator encourages further attention to the interface of decent work and supply chain management. A key feature of such research would be that it accounted for the supply chain context, both within and between organizations. Within an organization, decisions about the composition and treatment of the workforce are often separate from supply chain decisions and these supply chain decisions often occur across multiple functions. Equally, supply chain decision makers often influence and are accountable not only for their own organization but also for what other organizations (often in other countries or in a remote supply chain tier) do. Guaranteeing decent work in a supply chain that is accountable to all of its stakeholders, including shareholders and managers, is highly complex, and research for this EDI should account for these complexities.</p><p>We seek high-quality empirical submissions that explore decent work in supply chains from diverse perspectives and that advance theory and practice in line with JSCM’s mission. While we are open to submissions using both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as purely conceptual papers, submissions must make signification theoretical contributions. Authors are explicitly encouraged to incorporate insights from the two recent Emerging Discourse Incubators in the Journal of Supply Chain Management on “<i>Research at the Intersection of Supply Chain Management and Public Policy and Government Regulation</i>”1 (Fugate et al., <span>2019</span>) and “<i>Research Where the Focal Actor in the Network is Not a For-Profit Firm</i>”2 (Pagell, Fugate, & Flynn, <span>2018</span>; Pagell, Wiengarten, Fan, Humphreys, & Lo, <span>2018</span>) and connect them to the topic of decent work in global supply chains.</p><p>Potential topics and research questions are listed below, but submissions do not need to be limited to these suggestions. In addition, we encourage authors to consider empirical settings beyond manufacturing, including health care, non-profit organizations, logistics, government agencies, information technology, and others.</p><p><b>May 2020:</b> Initial call for submissions</p><p><b>January 2021:</b> Invited papers and guest editors’ introduction expected to appear online to initiate the discourse</p><p><b>January 2021–January 2022:</b> Submission window for normal submissions</p><p>Please direct any queries to guest editors Vivek Soundararajan (<span>[email protected]</span>), Miriam Wilhelm (<span>[email protected]</span>) and Andrew Crane (<span>[email protected]</span>) or JSCM co-editor Mark Pagell (<span>[email protected]</span>)</p>","PeriodicalId":51392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","volume":"56 3","pages":"88-91"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jscm.12235","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Call for papers for the 2021 Emerging Discourse Incubator: Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Towards Decent Work\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Soundararajan, Miriam Wilhelm, Andrew Crane, Mark Pagell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jscm.12235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The topic for <i>JSCM</i>'s fourth emerging discourse incubator (EDI) is Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Toward Decent Work. Decent work refers to “opportunities for work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for families, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men” (ILO, 2019). The goal of decent work for all is enshrined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals as SDG 8, “Decent work and Economic Growth”. Yet in many supply chains this goal remains elusive. For example, there is evidence that the supply chains of several prominent companies, such as Amazon, have not adequately addressed worker safety concerns in regard to the COVID-19 virus.</p><p>For decades, studies on decent work across disciplines like development studies, geography, political science, sociology and management have focused on various topics including barriers to decent work, causes of indecent work, and measures to improve and maintain decent work (e.g. Anker et al., <span>2003</span>; Barrientos, <span>2013</span>; Blustein et al., <span>2016</span>; Grandey et al., <span>2015</span>; Sehnbruch et al., <span>2015</span>). Insights from these studies have informed policies and practices across the globe, many of them focused on the governance of global supply chains.</p><p>Research on working conditions in SCM is often conducted under the broader theme of sustainable supply chain management. Under this theme, research has focused on topics such as the supplier capabilities for social management (Huq et al., <span>2016</span>), occupational health & safety (e.g. Cantor et al., <span>2017</span>; Pagell et al., <span>2018</span>), including that of emerging economy suppliers (Hamja et al., 2019), and the role of intermediaries in managing suppliers’ social practices (Soundararajan & Brammer, <span>2018</span>; Wilhelm et al., <span>2016</span>).</p><p>Nevertheless, a closer look at these studies suggests that decent work and SCM scholarship have had very little interaction. Therefore, this emerging discourse incubator encourages further attention to the interface of decent work and supply chain management. A key feature of such research would be that it accounted for the supply chain context, both within and between organizations. Within an organization, decisions about the composition and treatment of the workforce are often separate from supply chain decisions and these supply chain decisions often occur across multiple functions. Equally, supply chain decision makers often influence and are accountable not only for their own organization but also for what other organizations (often in other countries or in a remote supply chain tier) do. Guaranteeing decent work in a supply chain that is accountable to all of its stakeholders, including shareholders and managers, is highly complex, and research for this EDI should account for these complexities.</p><p>We seek high-quality empirical submissions that explore decent work in supply chains from diverse perspectives and that advance theory and practice in line with JSCM’s mission. While we are open to submissions using both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as purely conceptual papers, submissions must make signification theoretical contributions. Authors are explicitly encouraged to incorporate insights from the two recent Emerging Discourse Incubators in the Journal of Supply Chain Management on “<i>Research at the Intersection of Supply Chain Management and Public Policy and Government Regulation</i>”1 (Fugate et al., <span>2019</span>) and “<i>Research Where the Focal Actor in the Network is Not a For-Profit Firm</i>”2 (Pagell, Fugate, & Flynn, <span>2018</span>; Pagell, Wiengarten, Fan, Humphreys, & Lo, <span>2018</span>) and connect them to the topic of decent work in global supply chains.</p><p>Potential topics and research questions are listed below, but submissions do not need to be limited to these suggestions. In addition, we encourage authors to consider empirical settings beyond manufacturing, including health care, non-profit organizations, logistics, government agencies, information technology, and others.</p><p><b>May 2020:</b> Initial call for submissions</p><p><b>January 2021:</b> Invited papers and guest editors’ introduction expected to appear online to initiate the discourse</p><p><b>January 2021–January 2022:</b> Submission window for normal submissions</p><p>Please direct any queries to guest editors Vivek Soundararajan (<span>[email protected]</span>), Miriam Wilhelm (<span>[email protected]</span>) and Andrew Crane (<span>[email protected]</span>) or JSCM co-editor Mark Pagell (<span>[email protected]</span>)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supply Chain Management\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"88-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jscm.12235\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supply Chain Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jscm.12235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jscm.12235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
JSCM第四个新兴话语孵化器(EDI)的主题是管理供应链中的工作条件:走向体面工作。体面劳动指的是“有机会从事富有成效的工作,获得公平的收入,工作场所有保障,家庭得到社会保护,个人发展和社会融合的前景更好,人们可以自由表达自己的关切,组织和参与影响其生活的决策,以及所有男女机会和待遇平等”(国际劳工组织,2019年)。人人享有体面工作的目标载于联合国可持续发展目标第8项“体面工作和经济增长”。然而,在许多供应链中,这一目标仍然难以实现。例如,有证据表明,亚马逊等几家知名公司的供应链没有充分解决与COVID-19病毒有关的工人安全问题。几十年来,发展研究、地理学、政治学、社会学和管理学等学科对体面工作的研究集中在各种主题上,包括体面工作的障碍、不体面工作的原因以及改善和维持体面工作的措施(例如Anker等人,2003年;红领巾,2013;Blustein et al., 2016;Grandey等人,2015;Sehnbruch et al., 2015)。来自这些研究的见解为全球的政策和实践提供了信息,其中许多都集中在全球供应链的治理上。供应链管理中工作条件的研究通常是在可持续供应链管理这一更广泛的主题下进行的。在这一主题下,研究集中在诸如供应商社会管理能力(Huq et al., 2016),职业健康和;安全性(例如Cantor等人,2017;Pagell等人,2018),包括新兴经济体供应商(Hamja等人,2019),以及中介机构在管理供应商社会实践中的作用(Soundararajan等人;布拉姆,2018;Wilhelm et al., 2016)。然而,仔细观察这些研究表明,体面的工作和SCM奖学金几乎没有相互作用。因此,这个新兴的话语孵化器鼓励进一步关注体面劳动和供应链管理的接口。这种研究的一个关键特征是它考虑了组织内部和组织之间的供应链环境。在一个组织中,关于劳动力组成和待遇的决策通常与供应链决策分开,这些供应链决策通常跨多个功能发生。同样,供应链决策者通常不仅影响并对自己的组织负责,而且对其他组织(通常在其他国家或远程供应链层)的行为负责。在对所有利益相关者(包括股东和管理者)负责的供应链中保证体面的工作是非常复杂的,对这种EDI的研究应该考虑到这些复杂性。我们寻求高质量的经验意见书,从不同的角度探索供应链中的体面工作,并根据JSCM的使命推进理论和实践。虽然我们欢迎使用定性和定量方法以及纯概念论文提交,但提交的论文必须做出有意义的理论贡献。明确鼓励作者在《供应链管理杂志》上纳入最近出现的两个话语孵化器的见解,即“供应链管理与公共政策和政府监管交叉点的研究”1 (Fugate等人,2019)和“网络中的焦点参与者不是营利性公司的研究”2 (Pagell, Fugate, &弗林,2018;Pagell, Wiengarten, Fan, Humphreys, &;Lo, 2018),并将它们与全球供应链中的体面工作主题联系起来。潜在的主题和研究问题列在下面,但提交不需要局限于这些建议。此外,我们鼓励作者考虑制造业以外的经验环境,包括医疗保健、非营利组织、物流、政府机构、信息技术等。2020年5月:初步征稿2021年1月:特邀论文和客座编辑的介绍预计将出现在网上启动论述2021年1月- 2022年1月:正常投稿的提交窗口请直接向客座编辑Vivek Soundararajan ([email protected]), Miriam Wilhelm ([email protected])和Andrew Crane ([email protected])或JSCM联合编辑Mark Pagell ([email protected])查询。
Call for papers for the 2021 Emerging Discourse Incubator: Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Towards Decent Work
The topic for JSCM's fourth emerging discourse incubator (EDI) is Managing Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Toward Decent Work. Decent work refers to “opportunities for work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for families, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men” (ILO, 2019). The goal of decent work for all is enshrined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals as SDG 8, “Decent work and Economic Growth”. Yet in many supply chains this goal remains elusive. For example, there is evidence that the supply chains of several prominent companies, such as Amazon, have not adequately addressed worker safety concerns in regard to the COVID-19 virus.
For decades, studies on decent work across disciplines like development studies, geography, political science, sociology and management have focused on various topics including barriers to decent work, causes of indecent work, and measures to improve and maintain decent work (e.g. Anker et al., 2003; Barrientos, 2013; Blustein et al., 2016; Grandey et al., 2015; Sehnbruch et al., 2015). Insights from these studies have informed policies and practices across the globe, many of them focused on the governance of global supply chains.
Research on working conditions in SCM is often conducted under the broader theme of sustainable supply chain management. Under this theme, research has focused on topics such as the supplier capabilities for social management (Huq et al., 2016), occupational health & safety (e.g. Cantor et al., 2017; Pagell et al., 2018), including that of emerging economy suppliers (Hamja et al., 2019), and the role of intermediaries in managing suppliers’ social practices (Soundararajan & Brammer, 2018; Wilhelm et al., 2016).
Nevertheless, a closer look at these studies suggests that decent work and SCM scholarship have had very little interaction. Therefore, this emerging discourse incubator encourages further attention to the interface of decent work and supply chain management. A key feature of such research would be that it accounted for the supply chain context, both within and between organizations. Within an organization, decisions about the composition and treatment of the workforce are often separate from supply chain decisions and these supply chain decisions often occur across multiple functions. Equally, supply chain decision makers often influence and are accountable not only for their own organization but also for what other organizations (often in other countries or in a remote supply chain tier) do. Guaranteeing decent work in a supply chain that is accountable to all of its stakeholders, including shareholders and managers, is highly complex, and research for this EDI should account for these complexities.
We seek high-quality empirical submissions that explore decent work in supply chains from diverse perspectives and that advance theory and practice in line with JSCM’s mission. While we are open to submissions using both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as purely conceptual papers, submissions must make signification theoretical contributions. Authors are explicitly encouraged to incorporate insights from the two recent Emerging Discourse Incubators in the Journal of Supply Chain Management on “Research at the Intersection of Supply Chain Management and Public Policy and Government Regulation”1 (Fugate et al., 2019) and “Research Where the Focal Actor in the Network is Not a For-Profit Firm”2 (Pagell, Fugate, & Flynn, 2018; Pagell, Wiengarten, Fan, Humphreys, & Lo, 2018) and connect them to the topic of decent work in global supply chains.
Potential topics and research questions are listed below, but submissions do not need to be limited to these suggestions. In addition, we encourage authors to consider empirical settings beyond manufacturing, including health care, non-profit organizations, logistics, government agencies, information technology, and others.
May 2020: Initial call for submissions
January 2021: Invited papers and guest editors’ introduction expected to appear online to initiate the discourse
January 2021–January 2022: Submission window for normal submissions
Please direct any queries to guest editors Vivek Soundararajan ([email protected]), Miriam Wilhelm ([email protected]) and Andrew Crane ([email protected]) or JSCM co-editor Mark Pagell ([email protected])
期刊介绍:
ournal of Supply Chain Management
Mission:
The mission of the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) is to be the premier choice among supply chain management scholars from various disciplines. It aims to attract high-quality, impactful behavioral research that focuses on theory building and employs rigorous empirical methodologies.
Article Requirements:
An article published in JSCM must make a significant contribution to supply chain management theory. This contribution can be achieved through either an inductive, theory-building process or a deductive, theory-testing approach. This contribution may manifest in various ways, such as falsification of conventional understanding, theory-building through conceptual development, inductive or qualitative research, initial empirical testing of a theory, theoretically-based meta-analysis, or constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory.
Theoretical Contribution:
Manuscripts should explicitly convey the theoretical contribution relative to the existing supply chain management literature, and when appropriate, to the literature outside of supply chain management (e.g., management theory, psychology, economics).
Empirical Contribution:
Manuscripts published in JSCM must also provide strong empirical contributions. While conceptual manuscripts are welcomed, they must significantly advance theory in the field of supply chain management and be firmly grounded in existing theory and relevant literature. For empirical manuscripts, authors must adequately assess validity, which is essential for empirical research, whether quantitative or qualitative.