抗抑郁药和重度抑郁症患者的生活质量——双盲安慰剂对照随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Teresa Wiesinger, Stefanie Kremer, Tom Bschor, Christopher Baethge
{"title":"抗抑郁药和重度抑郁症患者的生活质量——双盲安慰剂对照随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Teresa Wiesinger,&nbsp;Stefanie Kremer,&nbsp;Tom Bschor,&nbsp;Christopher Baethge","doi":"10.1111/acps.13541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Quality of Life (QoL) is an important outcome in mental disorders. We investigated whether antidepressant pharmacotherapy improved QoL vs. placebo among patients with MDD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic literature search in CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed Central, and PsycINFO of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs. Screening, inclusion, extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We calculated summary standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95%-CIs. We followed Cochrane Collaboration's Handbook of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PRISMA guidelines (protocol registration at OSF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We selected 46 RCTs out of 1807 titles and abstracts screened, including 16.171 patients, 9131 on antidepressants and 7040 on placebo, a mean age of 50.9 years, with 64.8% women. Antidepressant drug treatment resulted in a SMD in QoL of 0.22 ([95%-CI: 0.18; 0.26] I<sup>2</sup> 39%) vs. placebo. SMDs differed by indication: 0.38 ([0.29; 0.46] I<sup>2</sup> 0%) in maintenance studies, 0.21 ([0.17; 0.25] I<sup>2</sup> 11%) in acute treatment studies, and 0.11 ([−0.05; 0.26], I<sup>2</sup> 51%) in studies focussing on patients with a physical condition and major depression. There was no indication of subtstantial small study effects, but 36 RCTs had a high or uncertain risk of bias, particularly maintenance trials. QoL and antidepressive effect sizes were associated (Spearman's rho 0.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Antidepressants' effects on QoL are small in primary MDD, and doubtful in secondary major depression and maintenance trials. The strong correlation of QoL and antidepressive effects indicates that the current practice of measuring QoL may not provide sufficient additional insights into the well-being of patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"147 6","pages":"545-560"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13541","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antidepressants and quality of life in patients with major depressive disorder – Systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Wiesinger,&nbsp;Stefanie Kremer,&nbsp;Tom Bschor,&nbsp;Christopher Baethge\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quality of Life (QoL) is an important outcome in mental disorders. We investigated whether antidepressant pharmacotherapy improved QoL vs. placebo among patients with MDD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systematic literature search in CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed Central, and PsycINFO of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs. Screening, inclusion, extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We calculated summary standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95%-CIs. We followed Cochrane Collaboration's Handbook of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PRISMA guidelines (protocol registration at OSF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We selected 46 RCTs out of 1807 titles and abstracts screened, including 16.171 patients, 9131 on antidepressants and 7040 on placebo, a mean age of 50.9 years, with 64.8% women. Antidepressant drug treatment resulted in a SMD in QoL of 0.22 ([95%-CI: 0.18; 0.26] I<sup>2</sup> 39%) vs. placebo. SMDs differed by indication: 0.38 ([0.29; 0.46] I<sup>2</sup> 0%) in maintenance studies, 0.21 ([0.17; 0.25] I<sup>2</sup> 11%) in acute treatment studies, and 0.11 ([−0.05; 0.26], I<sup>2</sup> 51%) in studies focussing on patients with a physical condition and major depression. There was no indication of subtstantial small study effects, but 36 RCTs had a high or uncertain risk of bias, particularly maintenance trials. QoL and antidepressive effect sizes were associated (Spearman's rho 0.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Antidepressants' effects on QoL are small in primary MDD, and doubtful in secondary major depression and maintenance trials. The strong correlation of QoL and antidepressive effects indicates that the current practice of measuring QoL may not provide sufficient additional insights into the well-being of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"147 6\",\"pages\":\"545-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13541\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

生活质量(QoL)是精神障碍的一个重要指标。我们调查了抗抑郁药物治疗与安慰剂相比是否能改善重度抑郁症患者的生活质量。方法在CENTRAL、Medline、PubMed CENTRAL和PsycINFO中检索双盲、安慰剂对照的文献。筛选、纳入、提取和偏倚风险评估由两位审稿人独立进行。我们计算了95%- ci的总标准化平均差异(SMD)。我们遵循Cochrane Collaboration的《系统评价与荟萃分析手册》和PRISMA指南(在OSF注册的方案)。结果我们从筛选的1807篇标题和摘要中选择了46篇rct,包括16.171例患者,其中抗抑郁药9131例,安慰剂7040例,平均年龄50.9岁,其中64.8%为女性。抗抑郁药物治疗导致SMD的生活质量为0.22 (95%-CI: 0.18;0.26] I2 (39%) vs.安慰剂。不同适应症的smd差异:0.38 ([0.29;[0.46] I2 %), 0.21 ([0.17;在急性治疗研究中,0.25]I2 11%), 0.11([−0.05;0.26], I2 51%),主要针对身体状况和重度抑郁症患者的研究。没有迹象表明有实质性的小研究效应,但36项随机对照试验存在较高或不确定的偏倚风险,特别是维持试验。生活质量和抗抑郁效应大小相关(Spearman's rho 0.73, p < 0.001)。结论抗抑郁药物对原发性重度抑郁症患者生活质量的影响较小,对继发性重度抑郁症患者生活质量的影响值得怀疑。生活质量与抗抑郁作用的强相关性表明,目前测量生活质量的做法可能无法为患者的健康状况提供足够的额外见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antidepressants and quality of life in patients with major depressive disorder – Systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs

Background

Quality of Life (QoL) is an important outcome in mental disorders. We investigated whether antidepressant pharmacotherapy improved QoL vs. placebo among patients with MDD.

Methods

Systematic literature search in CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed Central, and PsycINFO of double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs. Screening, inclusion, extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We calculated summary standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95%-CIs. We followed Cochrane Collaboration's Handbook of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PRISMA guidelines (protocol registration at OSF).

Results

We selected 46 RCTs out of 1807 titles and abstracts screened, including 16.171 patients, 9131 on antidepressants and 7040 on placebo, a mean age of 50.9 years, with 64.8% women. Antidepressant drug treatment resulted in a SMD in QoL of 0.22 ([95%-CI: 0.18; 0.26] I2 39%) vs. placebo. SMDs differed by indication: 0.38 ([0.29; 0.46] I2 0%) in maintenance studies, 0.21 ([0.17; 0.25] I2 11%) in acute treatment studies, and 0.11 ([−0.05; 0.26], I2 51%) in studies focussing on patients with a physical condition and major depression. There was no indication of subtstantial small study effects, but 36 RCTs had a high or uncertain risk of bias, particularly maintenance trials. QoL and antidepressive effect sizes were associated (Spearman's rho 0.73, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Antidepressants' effects on QoL are small in primary MDD, and doubtful in secondary major depression and maintenance trials. The strong correlation of QoL and antidepressive effects indicates that the current practice of measuring QoL may not provide sufficient additional insights into the well-being of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信