黑人和白人参与者以及护理伙伴对淀粉样蛋白和Tau PET成像和其他研究结果的回报的看法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Mary Lesniak, Shima Sadaghiyani, Scott Roberts, Peter Lichtenberg, Benjamin M Hampstead
{"title":"黑人和白人参与者以及护理伙伴对淀粉样蛋白和Tau PET成像和其他研究结果的回报的看法。","authors":"Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Mary Lesniak, Shima Sadaghiyani, Scott Roberts, Peter Lichtenberg, Benjamin M Hampstead","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker testing is now common in research and approaching clinical translation. Disclosure protocols must be informed by diverse participants' perspectives on if/how the information would be useful.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized semistructured interviews assessing interest in receiving positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid and tau results, as well as perceived risks and benefits of hypothetical PET disclosure as a function of race and participant diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants [39% Black; 61% White; Mage =74.28 (5.98)] included 57 adults diagnosed as either cognitively healthy (58%) or with mild cognitive impairment (42%) and their respective care partners [33% Black; 67% White; Mage =66.93 (10.92)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most dyads endorsed strong interest in PET results (82.5% of both participants and partners) regardless of race or diagnosis. Black care partners were less interested in receiving the participant's results than White care partners ( χ2(4) =8.31, P =0.047). Reasons for disclosure were diverse and highly personalized, including access to treatments or clinical trials (23.2% participants; 29.8% partners), advance planning (14.3% participants; 17.5% partners), and improved health knowledge (12.5% participants; 15.8% partners). In contrast, over 80% of respondents denied any risks of disclosure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results suggest that predisclosure education, decisional capacity assessment, and a flexible disclosure approach are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"274-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives From Black and White Participants and Care Partners on Return of Amyloid and Tau PET Imaging and Other Research Results.\",\"authors\":\"Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Mary Lesniak, Shima Sadaghiyani, Scott Roberts, Peter Lichtenberg, Benjamin M Hampstead\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker testing is now common in research and approaching clinical translation. Disclosure protocols must be informed by diverse participants' perspectives on if/how the information would be useful.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized semistructured interviews assessing interest in receiving positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid and tau results, as well as perceived risks and benefits of hypothetical PET disclosure as a function of race and participant diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants [39% Black; 61% White; Mage =74.28 (5.98)] included 57 adults diagnosed as either cognitively healthy (58%) or with mild cognitive impairment (42%) and their respective care partners [33% Black; 67% White; Mage =66.93 (10.92)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most dyads endorsed strong interest in PET results (82.5% of both participants and partners) regardless of race or diagnosis. Black care partners were less interested in receiving the participant's results than White care partners ( χ2(4) =8.31, P =0.047). Reasons for disclosure were diverse and highly personalized, including access to treatments or clinical trials (23.2% participants; 29.8% partners), advance planning (14.3% participants; 17.5% partners), and improved health knowledge (12.5% participants; 15.8% partners). In contrast, over 80% of respondents denied any risks of disclosure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results suggest that predisclosure education, decisional capacity assessment, and a flexible disclosure approach are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"274-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000591\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物检测现在在研究和临床翻译中很常见。披露协议必须根据不同参与者对信息是否有用/如何有用的看法。方法:本研究利用半结构访谈评估对接受正电子发射断层扫描(PET)淀粉样蛋白和tau结果的兴趣,以及假设PET披露作为种族和参与者诊断的函数的感知风险和益处。参与者:参与者[39%黑人;61%白人;Mage=74.28(5.98)]包括57名被诊断为认知健康(58%)或轻度认知障碍(42%)的成年人及其各自的护理伙伴[33%黑人;67%白人;Mage=66.93(10.92)]。与白人护理伙伴相比,黑人护理伙伴对接受参与者的结果不太感兴趣(χ2(4)=8.31,P=0.047)。披露的原因多种多样且高度个性化,包括获得治疗或临床试验(23.2%的参与者;29.8%的伙伴)、提前计划(14.3%的参与者,17.5%的伙伴),提高了健康知识(12.5%的参与者;15.8%的合作伙伴)。相比之下,超过80%的受访者否认存在任何披露风险。讨论:结果表明,披露前教育、决策能力评估和灵活的披露方法是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives From Black and White Participants and Care Partners on Return of Amyloid and Tau PET Imaging and Other Research Results.

Purpose: Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker testing is now common in research and approaching clinical translation. Disclosure protocols must be informed by diverse participants' perspectives on if/how the information would be useful.

Methods: This study utilized semistructured interviews assessing interest in receiving positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid and tau results, as well as perceived risks and benefits of hypothetical PET disclosure as a function of race and participant diagnosis.

Participants: Participants [39% Black; 61% White; Mage =74.28 (5.98)] included 57 adults diagnosed as either cognitively healthy (58%) or with mild cognitive impairment (42%) and their respective care partners [33% Black; 67% White; Mage =66.93 (10.92)].

Results: Most dyads endorsed strong interest in PET results (82.5% of both participants and partners) regardless of race or diagnosis. Black care partners were less interested in receiving the participant's results than White care partners ( χ2(4) =8.31, P =0.047). Reasons for disclosure were diverse and highly personalized, including access to treatments or clinical trials (23.2% participants; 29.8% partners), advance planning (14.3% participants; 17.5% partners), and improved health knowledge (12.5% participants; 15.8% partners). In contrast, over 80% of respondents denied any risks of disclosure.

Discussion: Results suggest that predisclosure education, decisional capacity assessment, and a flexible disclosure approach are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信