{"title":"提高3 Screen ICA ELISA试剂盒对日本1型糖尿病的诊断准确性","authors":"Eiji Kawasaki, Hideaki Jinnouchi, Yasutaka Maeda, Akira Okada, Yoshihisa Ito, Koichi Kawai","doi":"10.1111/jdi.14038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim/Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of 3 Screen ICA ELISA in identifying immune-mediated type 1 diabetes in Japanese subjects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compared the positivity of 3 Screen ICA were compared with autoantibodies against GAD, IA-2, and ZnT8 in 638 patients with type 1 diabetes and 159 healthy control subjects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>With a cut-off value of 20.0 index, 67.4% of acute-onset type 1 diabetic patients, 71.8% of slowly progressive type 1 diabetic (SPIDDM) patients, and none of the fulminant type 1 diabetic patients showed 3 Screen ICA levels above this threshold. The prevalence of 3 Screen ICA was 14.2% higher in acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 1.6% higher in SPIDDM than in GADA. 3 Screen ICA-positive cases were found in 4.8% of cases of individual autoantibody-negative acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 3.8% of SPIDDM, indicating improved diagnostic sensitivity with the 3 Screen ICA. Among individual autoantibody-negative patients, the sum of each autoantibody level was significantly lower in fulminant type 1 diabetes than in acute onset type 1 diabetes and in SPIDDM (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, 84.2% of patients negative for individual autoantibodies but positive for 3 Screen ICA had a sum of individual autoantibody levels of ≥4.7 U/mL. Furthermore, 3 Screen ICA levels were significantly higher in patients with type 1 diabetes with other autoimmune diseases than in those without (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that the 3 Screen ICA ELISA may be a valuable screening tool for Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes, potentially increasing the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy beyond the existing GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A tests.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"14 9","pages":"1081-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.14038","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving diagnostic accuracy of 3 Screen ICA ELISA kit in the identification of Japanese type 1 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Eiji Kawasaki, Hideaki Jinnouchi, Yasutaka Maeda, Akira Okada, Yoshihisa Ito, Koichi Kawai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jdi.14038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim/Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of 3 Screen ICA ELISA in identifying immune-mediated type 1 diabetes in Japanese subjects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compared the positivity of 3 Screen ICA were compared with autoantibodies against GAD, IA-2, and ZnT8 in 638 patients with type 1 diabetes and 159 healthy control subjects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>With a cut-off value of 20.0 index, 67.4% of acute-onset type 1 diabetic patients, 71.8% of slowly progressive type 1 diabetic (SPIDDM) patients, and none of the fulminant type 1 diabetic patients showed 3 Screen ICA levels above this threshold. The prevalence of 3 Screen ICA was 14.2% higher in acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 1.6% higher in SPIDDM than in GADA. 3 Screen ICA-positive cases were found in 4.8% of cases of individual autoantibody-negative acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 3.8% of SPIDDM, indicating improved diagnostic sensitivity with the 3 Screen ICA. Among individual autoantibody-negative patients, the sum of each autoantibody level was significantly lower in fulminant type 1 diabetes than in acute onset type 1 diabetes and in SPIDDM (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, 84.2% of patients negative for individual autoantibodies but positive for 3 Screen ICA had a sum of individual autoantibody levels of ≥4.7 U/mL. Furthermore, 3 Screen ICA levels were significantly higher in patients with type 1 diabetes with other autoimmune diseases than in those without (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that the 3 Screen ICA ELISA may be a valuable screening tool for Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes, potentially increasing the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy beyond the existing GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A tests.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Investigation\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"1081-1091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.14038\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.14038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.14038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving diagnostic accuracy of 3 Screen ICA ELISA kit in the identification of Japanese type 1 diabetes
Aim/Introduction
This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of 3 Screen ICA ELISA in identifying immune-mediated type 1 diabetes in Japanese subjects.
Methods
We compared the positivity of 3 Screen ICA were compared with autoantibodies against GAD, IA-2, and ZnT8 in 638 patients with type 1 diabetes and 159 healthy control subjects.
Results
With a cut-off value of 20.0 index, 67.4% of acute-onset type 1 diabetic patients, 71.8% of slowly progressive type 1 diabetic (SPIDDM) patients, and none of the fulminant type 1 diabetic patients showed 3 Screen ICA levels above this threshold. The prevalence of 3 Screen ICA was 14.2% higher in acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 1.6% higher in SPIDDM than in GADA. 3 Screen ICA-positive cases were found in 4.8% of cases of individual autoantibody-negative acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 3.8% of SPIDDM, indicating improved diagnostic sensitivity with the 3 Screen ICA. Among individual autoantibody-negative patients, the sum of each autoantibody level was significantly lower in fulminant type 1 diabetes than in acute onset type 1 diabetes and in SPIDDM (P < 0.0001). Additionally, 84.2% of patients negative for individual autoantibodies but positive for 3 Screen ICA had a sum of individual autoantibody levels of ≥4.7 U/mL. Furthermore, 3 Screen ICA levels were significantly higher in patients with type 1 diabetes with other autoimmune diseases than in those without (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that the 3 Screen ICA ELISA may be a valuable screening tool for Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes, potentially increasing the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy beyond the existing GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A tests.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).