骶髂螺钉相对于第一骶神经孔放置的计算机断层扫描评估。

P. Rose, B. Goldberg, R. Lindsey, C. Foglar, T. D. Hedrick, T. Miclau, J. Haddad, M. Khan
{"title":"骶髂螺钉相对于第一骶神经孔放置的计算机断层扫描评估。","authors":"P. Rose, B. Goldberg, R. Lindsey, C. Foglar, T. D. Hedrick, T. Miclau, J. Haddad, M. Khan","doi":"10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The radiographic interpretation of sacroiliac screws relative to the S1 neuroforamen is difficult for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) with axial images alone or combined with multiplanar reconstructions are often used to assess screw position. The reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of orthopedist and radiologist interpretations of axial CT images with and without multiplanar reconstructions was determined using 24 cadaveric hemipelves with known sacroiliac screw position. Interobserver reliability of determining screw position was fair for orthopedists and slight for radiologists regardless of imaging modality or screw composition. Intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for orthopedists regardless of imaging modality or screw type. Reproducibility among radiologists was moderate using axial images of titanium screws and substantial with addition of multiplanar reconstructions. Overall accuracy was similar for orthopedists and radiologists. CT images with multiplanar reconstructions improve accuracy in determining sacroiliac screw position, but not significantly. Current imaging modalities are limited by large inaccuracies and by interobserver and intraobserver variation.","PeriodicalId":77226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spinal disorders","volume":"14 4 1","pages":"330-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed tomography assessment of sacroiliac screw placement relative to the first sacral neuroforamen.\",\"authors\":\"P. Rose, B. Goldberg, R. Lindsey, C. Foglar, T. D. Hedrick, T. Miclau, J. Haddad, M. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The radiographic interpretation of sacroiliac screws relative to the S1 neuroforamen is difficult for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) with axial images alone or combined with multiplanar reconstructions are often used to assess screw position. The reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of orthopedist and radiologist interpretations of axial CT images with and without multiplanar reconstructions was determined using 24 cadaveric hemipelves with known sacroiliac screw position. Interobserver reliability of determining screw position was fair for orthopedists and slight for radiologists regardless of imaging modality or screw composition. Intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for orthopedists regardless of imaging modality or screw type. Reproducibility among radiologists was moderate using axial images of titanium screws and substantial with addition of multiplanar reconstructions. Overall accuracy was similar for orthopedists and radiologists. CT images with multiplanar reconstructions improve accuracy in determining sacroiliac screw position, but not significantly. Current imaging modalities are limited by large inaccuracies and by interobserver and intraobserver variation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spinal disorders\",\"volume\":\"14 4 1\",\"pages\":\"330-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spinal disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spinal disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200108000-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

骶髂螺钉相对于S1神经孔的x线摄影解释对骨科医生和放射科医生来说是困难的。计算机断层扫描(CT)与轴向图像单独或结合多平面重建常用于评估螺钉的位置。利用24具已知骶髂螺钉位置的尸体,确定骨科和放射科医生对轴向CT图像进行多平面重建和不进行多平面重建的可靠性、再现性和准确性。无论成像方式或螺钉组成如何,骨科医生之间确定螺钉位置的可靠性尚可,而放射科医生的可靠性较低。无论成像方式或螺钉类型如何,骨科医生的观察内再现性中等。放射科医生使用钛螺钉轴向图像的再现性中等,添加多平面重建后再现性较好。骨科医生和放射科医生的总体准确率相似。CT多平面重建图像可提高骶髂螺钉定位的准确性,但效果不显著。目前的成像模式受到较大的不准确性以及观察者之间和观察者内部变化的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computed tomography assessment of sacroiliac screw placement relative to the first sacral neuroforamen.
The radiographic interpretation of sacroiliac screws relative to the S1 neuroforamen is difficult for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) with axial images alone or combined with multiplanar reconstructions are often used to assess screw position. The reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of orthopedist and radiologist interpretations of axial CT images with and without multiplanar reconstructions was determined using 24 cadaveric hemipelves with known sacroiliac screw position. Interobserver reliability of determining screw position was fair for orthopedists and slight for radiologists regardless of imaging modality or screw composition. Intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for orthopedists regardless of imaging modality or screw type. Reproducibility among radiologists was moderate using axial images of titanium screws and substantial with addition of multiplanar reconstructions. Overall accuracy was similar for orthopedists and radiologists. CT images with multiplanar reconstructions improve accuracy in determining sacroiliac screw position, but not significantly. Current imaging modalities are limited by large inaccuracies and by interobserver and intraobserver variation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信