RuBisCO和CO2浓度对蓝藻生长和碳同位素分馏的影响

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Geobiology Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1111/gbi.12543
Amanda K. Garcia, Mateusz K?dzior, Arnaud Taton, Meng Li, Jodi N. Young, Betül Ka?ar
{"title":"RuBisCO和CO2浓度对蓝藻生长和碳同位素分馏的影响","authors":"Amanda K. Garcia,&nbsp;Mateusz K?dzior,&nbsp;Arnaud Taton,&nbsp;Meng Li,&nbsp;Jodi N. Young,&nbsp;Betül Ka?ar","doi":"10.1111/gbi.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbon isotope biosignatures preserved in the Precambrian geologic record are primarily interpreted to reflect ancient cyanobacterial carbon fixation catalyzed by Form I RuBisCO enzymes. The average range of isotopic biosignatures generally follows that produced by extant cyanobacteria. However, this observation is difficult to reconcile with several environmental (e.g., temperature, pH, and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations), molecular, and physiological factors that likely would have differed during the Precambrian and can produce fractionation variability in contemporary organisms that meets or exceeds that observed in the geologic record. To test a specific range of genetic and environmental factors that may impact ancient carbon isotope biosignatures, we engineered a mutant strain of the model cyanobacterium <i>Synechococcus elongatus</i> PCC 7942 that overexpresses RuBisCO across varying atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. We hypothesized that changes in RuBisCO expression would impact the net rates of intracellular CO<sub>2</sub> fixation versus CO<sub>2</sub> supply, and thus whole-cell carbon isotope discrimination. In particular, we investigated the impacts of RuBisCO overexpression under changing CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations on both carbon isotope biosignatures and cyanobacterial physiology, including cell growth and oxygen evolution rates. We found that an increased pool of active RuBisCO does not significantly affect the <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C isotopic discrimination (ε<sub>p</sub>) at all tested CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, yielding ε<sub>p</sub> of ≈ 23‰ for both wild-type and mutant strains at elevated CO<sub>2</sub>. We therefore suggest that expected variation in cyanobacterial RuBisCO expression patterns should not confound carbon isotope biosignature interpretation. A deeper understanding of environmental, evolutionary, and intracellular factors that impact cyanobacterial physiology and isotope discrimination is crucial for reconciling microbially driven carbon biosignatures with those preserved in the geologic record.</p>","PeriodicalId":173,"journal":{"name":"Geobiology","volume":"21 3","pages":"390-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gbi.12543","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of RuBisCO and CO2 concentration on cyanobacterial growth and carbon isotope fractionation\",\"authors\":\"Amanda K. Garcia,&nbsp;Mateusz K?dzior,&nbsp;Arnaud Taton,&nbsp;Meng Li,&nbsp;Jodi N. Young,&nbsp;Betül Ka?ar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gbi.12543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Carbon isotope biosignatures preserved in the Precambrian geologic record are primarily interpreted to reflect ancient cyanobacterial carbon fixation catalyzed by Form I RuBisCO enzymes. The average range of isotopic biosignatures generally follows that produced by extant cyanobacteria. However, this observation is difficult to reconcile with several environmental (e.g., temperature, pH, and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations), molecular, and physiological factors that likely would have differed during the Precambrian and can produce fractionation variability in contemporary organisms that meets or exceeds that observed in the geologic record. To test a specific range of genetic and environmental factors that may impact ancient carbon isotope biosignatures, we engineered a mutant strain of the model cyanobacterium <i>Synechococcus elongatus</i> PCC 7942 that overexpresses RuBisCO across varying atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. We hypothesized that changes in RuBisCO expression would impact the net rates of intracellular CO<sub>2</sub> fixation versus CO<sub>2</sub> supply, and thus whole-cell carbon isotope discrimination. In particular, we investigated the impacts of RuBisCO overexpression under changing CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations on both carbon isotope biosignatures and cyanobacterial physiology, including cell growth and oxygen evolution rates. We found that an increased pool of active RuBisCO does not significantly affect the <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C isotopic discrimination (ε<sub>p</sub>) at all tested CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, yielding ε<sub>p</sub> of ≈ 23‰ for both wild-type and mutant strains at elevated CO<sub>2</sub>. We therefore suggest that expected variation in cyanobacterial RuBisCO expression patterns should not confound carbon isotope biosignature interpretation. A deeper understanding of environmental, evolutionary, and intracellular factors that impact cyanobacterial physiology and isotope discrimination is crucial for reconciling microbially driven carbon biosignatures with those preserved in the geologic record.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geobiology\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"390-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gbi.12543\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gbi.12543\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geobiology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gbi.12543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

前寒武纪地质记录中保存的碳同位素生物特征主要反映了由I型RuBisCO酶催化的古蓝藻固碳。同位素生物特征的平均范围一般遵循由现存蓝藻产生的。然而,这一观测结果很难与环境因素(如温度、pH值和二氧化碳浓度)、分子和生理因素相一致,这些因素可能在前寒武纪期间存在差异,并可能在当代生物中产生符合或超过地质记录中观察到的分异。为了测试可能影响古代碳同位素生物特征的特定遗传和环境因素,我们设计了一种模型蓝藻长聚球菌PCC 7942的突变菌株,该菌株在不同的大气CO2浓度下过表达RuBisCO。我们假设RuBisCO表达的变化会影响细胞内二氧化碳固定相对于二氧化碳供应的净速率,从而影响全细胞碳同位素识别。我们特别研究了二氧化碳浓度变化下RuBisCO过表达对碳同位素生物特征和蓝藻生理的影响,包括细胞生长和氧进化速率。我们发现,在所有测试的CO2浓度下,活性RuBisCO池的增加对13C/12C同位素辨别(εp)没有显著影响,在高CO2浓度下,野生型和突变株的εp均为≈23‰。因此,我们认为蓝藻RuBisCO表达模式的预期变化不应混淆碳同位素生物特征解释。更深入地了解影响蓝藻生理和同位素区分的环境、进化和细胞内因素对于调和微生物驱动的碳生物特征与地质记录中保存的碳生物特征至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of RuBisCO and CO2 concentration on cyanobacterial growth and carbon isotope fractionation

Carbon isotope biosignatures preserved in the Precambrian geologic record are primarily interpreted to reflect ancient cyanobacterial carbon fixation catalyzed by Form I RuBisCO enzymes. The average range of isotopic biosignatures generally follows that produced by extant cyanobacteria. However, this observation is difficult to reconcile with several environmental (e.g., temperature, pH, and CO2 concentrations), molecular, and physiological factors that likely would have differed during the Precambrian and can produce fractionation variability in contemporary organisms that meets or exceeds that observed in the geologic record. To test a specific range of genetic and environmental factors that may impact ancient carbon isotope biosignatures, we engineered a mutant strain of the model cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 that overexpresses RuBisCO across varying atmospheric CO2 concentrations. We hypothesized that changes in RuBisCO expression would impact the net rates of intracellular CO2 fixation versus CO2 supply, and thus whole-cell carbon isotope discrimination. In particular, we investigated the impacts of RuBisCO overexpression under changing CO2 concentrations on both carbon isotope biosignatures and cyanobacterial physiology, including cell growth and oxygen evolution rates. We found that an increased pool of active RuBisCO does not significantly affect the 13C/12C isotopic discrimination (εp) at all tested CO2 concentrations, yielding εp of ≈ 23‰ for both wild-type and mutant strains at elevated CO2. We therefore suggest that expected variation in cyanobacterial RuBisCO expression patterns should not confound carbon isotope biosignature interpretation. A deeper understanding of environmental, evolutionary, and intracellular factors that impact cyanobacterial physiology and isotope discrimination is crucial for reconciling microbially driven carbon biosignatures with those preserved in the geologic record.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geobiology
Geobiology 生物-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The field of geobiology explores the relationship between life and the Earth''s physical and chemical environment. Geobiology, launched in 2003, aims to provide a natural home for geobiological research, allowing the cross-fertilization of critical ideas, and promoting cooperation and advancement in this emerging field. We also aim to provide you with a forum for the rapid publication of your results in an international journal of high standing. We are particularly interested in papers crossing disciplines and containing both geological and biological elements, emphasizing the co-evolutionary interactions between life and its physical environment over geological time. Geobiology invites submission of high-quality articles in the following areas: Origins and evolution of life Co-evolution of the atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere The sedimentary rock record and geobiology of critical intervals Paleobiology and evolutionary ecology Biogeochemistry and global elemental cycles Microbe-mineral interactions Biomarkers Molecular ecology and phylogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信