国际在线焦点小组中学生关于死亡与遗体捐赠的讨论专题分析

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anette Wu, Sean C. McWatt, Rachel Utomo, Austin Talis, Que Yun Xiao, Kerstin Saraci, Cecilia Brassett, Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Richard Wingate, Chung-Liang Chien, Hannes Traxler, Jens Waschke, Fransziska Vielmuth, Anna Sigmund, Yukari Yamada, Takeshi Sakurai, Mina Zeroual, Jorgen Olsen, Salma El-Batti, Suvi Viranta-Kovanen, Kevin Keay, William Stewart, Yinghui Mao, Ariella Lang, Carol Kunzel, Paulette Bernd, Heike Kielstein, Geoffroy P. J. C. No?l
{"title":"国际在线焦点小组中学生关于死亡与遗体捐赠的讨论专题分析","authors":"Anette Wu,&nbsp;Sean C. McWatt,&nbsp;Rachel Utomo,&nbsp;Austin Talis,&nbsp;Que Yun Xiao,&nbsp;Kerstin Saraci,&nbsp;Cecilia Brassett,&nbsp;Mandeep Gill Sagoo,&nbsp;Richard Wingate,&nbsp;Chung-Liang Chien,&nbsp;Hannes Traxler,&nbsp;Jens Waschke,&nbsp;Fransziska Vielmuth,&nbsp;Anna Sigmund,&nbsp;Yukari Yamada,&nbsp;Takeshi Sakurai,&nbsp;Mina Zeroual,&nbsp;Jorgen Olsen,&nbsp;Salma El-Batti,&nbsp;Suvi Viranta-Kovanen,&nbsp;Kevin Keay,&nbsp;William Stewart,&nbsp;Yinghui Mao,&nbsp;Ariella Lang,&nbsp;Carol Kunzel,&nbsp;Paulette Bernd,&nbsp;Heike Kielstein,&nbsp;Geoffroy P. J. C. No?l","doi":"10.1002/ase.2265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historically, Anatomy education is an in-person discipline involving exposure to human body donors that facilitates personal and professional growth through, in part, the initiation of reflection on the topic of death. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic the decreased exposure to cadaveric anatomy for many health professions students may have influenced the depth of their individual reflections on this topic. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effect of an alternate approach—focus group discussions between peers with varying degrees of exposure to cadaveric material—that may offer one strategy to stimulate deep reflection on the topic of death. A programmatic intervention was introduced, wherein students (<i>n</i> = 221) from 13 international universities discussed differences in their anatomy courses during small focus group sessions as part of an online exchange program. An inductive semantic thematic analysis was conducted on responses to an open-ended text–response question on how the activity influenced students' reflections about death. Resulting themes were organized into categories that described the content and topics of the students' discussions as they grappled with this sensitive topic. The students reportedly engaged in deep reflection and expressed an increased sense of connectedness with their peers, despite their disparate exposure levels to cadaveric anatomy and being physically distanced. This demonstrates that focus groups with students experiencing different laboratory contexts can be used to help all students reflect on the topic of death and that interchanges between dissecting and non-dissecting students can initiate thoughts about death and body donation among non-dissecting students.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"16 4","pages":"768-784"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A thematic analysis of students' discussions on death and body donation in international online focus groups\",\"authors\":\"Anette Wu,&nbsp;Sean C. McWatt,&nbsp;Rachel Utomo,&nbsp;Austin Talis,&nbsp;Que Yun Xiao,&nbsp;Kerstin Saraci,&nbsp;Cecilia Brassett,&nbsp;Mandeep Gill Sagoo,&nbsp;Richard Wingate,&nbsp;Chung-Liang Chien,&nbsp;Hannes Traxler,&nbsp;Jens Waschke,&nbsp;Fransziska Vielmuth,&nbsp;Anna Sigmund,&nbsp;Yukari Yamada,&nbsp;Takeshi Sakurai,&nbsp;Mina Zeroual,&nbsp;Jorgen Olsen,&nbsp;Salma El-Batti,&nbsp;Suvi Viranta-Kovanen,&nbsp;Kevin Keay,&nbsp;William Stewart,&nbsp;Yinghui Mao,&nbsp;Ariella Lang,&nbsp;Carol Kunzel,&nbsp;Paulette Bernd,&nbsp;Heike Kielstein,&nbsp;Geoffroy P. J. C. No?l\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Historically, Anatomy education is an in-person discipline involving exposure to human body donors that facilitates personal and professional growth through, in part, the initiation of reflection on the topic of death. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic the decreased exposure to cadaveric anatomy for many health professions students may have influenced the depth of their individual reflections on this topic. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effect of an alternate approach—focus group discussions between peers with varying degrees of exposure to cadaveric material—that may offer one strategy to stimulate deep reflection on the topic of death. A programmatic intervention was introduced, wherein students (<i>n</i> = 221) from 13 international universities discussed differences in their anatomy courses during small focus group sessions as part of an online exchange program. An inductive semantic thematic analysis was conducted on responses to an open-ended text–response question on how the activity influenced students' reflections about death. Resulting themes were organized into categories that described the content and topics of the students' discussions as they grappled with this sensitive topic. The students reportedly engaged in deep reflection and expressed an increased sense of connectedness with their peers, despite their disparate exposure levels to cadaveric anatomy and being physically distanced. This demonstrates that focus groups with students experiencing different laboratory contexts can be used to help all students reflect on the topic of death and that interchanges between dissecting and non-dissecting students can initiate thoughts about death and body donation among non-dissecting students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"768-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从历史上看,解剖学教育是一门面对面的学科,涉及接触人体捐赠者,通过对死亡主题的反思,部分地促进了个人和专业的成长。然而,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多卫生专业学生接触尸体解剖的机会减少,可能影响了他们对这一主题的个人反思的深度。因此,本研究旨在调查另一种方法的效果,即在不同程度接触尸体材料的同龄人之间进行焦点小组讨论,这可能提供一种策略来激发对死亡主题的深刻反思。作为在线交流计划的一部分,来自13所国际大学的学生(n = 221)在小型焦点小组会议上讨论了他们解剖学课程的差异。对开放性文本问题的回答进行归纳语义主题分析,探讨活动如何影响学生对死亡的思考。由此产生的主题被组织成描述学生讨论的内容和主题的类别,因为他们努力解决这个敏感的话题。据报道,学生们进行了深刻的反思,并表达了与同龄人的联系感增强,尽管他们对尸体解剖的接触程度不同,而且身体上保持距离。这表明,与经历不同实验室环境的学生组成的焦点小组可以用来帮助所有学生反思死亡主题,并且解剖学生和非解剖学生之间的交流可以激发非解剖学生对死亡和遗体捐赠的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A thematic analysis of students' discussions on death and body donation in international online focus groups

Historically, Anatomy education is an in-person discipline involving exposure to human body donors that facilitates personal and professional growth through, in part, the initiation of reflection on the topic of death. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic the decreased exposure to cadaveric anatomy for many health professions students may have influenced the depth of their individual reflections on this topic. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effect of an alternate approach—focus group discussions between peers with varying degrees of exposure to cadaveric material—that may offer one strategy to stimulate deep reflection on the topic of death. A programmatic intervention was introduced, wherein students (n = 221) from 13 international universities discussed differences in their anatomy courses during small focus group sessions as part of an online exchange program. An inductive semantic thematic analysis was conducted on responses to an open-ended text–response question on how the activity influenced students' reflections about death. Resulting themes were organized into categories that described the content and topics of the students' discussions as they grappled with this sensitive topic. The students reportedly engaged in deep reflection and expressed an increased sense of connectedness with their peers, despite their disparate exposure levels to cadaveric anatomy and being physically distanced. This demonstrates that focus groups with students experiencing different laboratory contexts can be used to help all students reflect on the topic of death and that interchanges between dissecting and non-dissecting students can initiate thoughts about death and body donation among non-dissecting students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信