{"title":"利用机载光探测和测距作为采样工具估算阿拉斯加内陆上塔纳纳山谷森林生物量资源","authors":"H. Andersen, Jacob L. Strunk, H. Temesgen","doi":"10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"proportion of the variability associated with sampling error and modeling error was assessed. Results indicate that LiDAR sampling can be used to obtain estimates of total biomass with an acceptable level of precision (8.1 0.7 [8%] teragrams [total SD]), with sampling error accounting for 58% of the SD of the bootstrap distribution. In addition, we investigated the influence of plot location (i.e., GPS) error, plot size, and field-measured diameter threshold on the variability of the total biomass estimate. We found that using a larger plot (1/30 ha versus 1/59 ha) and a lower diameter threshold (7.6 versus 12.5 cm) significantly reduced the SD of the bootstrap distribution (by approximately 20%), whereas larger plot location error (over a range from 0 to 20 m root mean square error) steadily increased variability at both plot sizes.","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"26 1","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Airborne Light Detection and Ranging as a Sampling Tool for Estimating Forest Biomass Resources in the Upper Tanana Valley of Interior Alaska\",\"authors\":\"H. Andersen, Jacob L. Strunk, H. Temesgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"proportion of the variability associated with sampling error and modeling error was assessed. Results indicate that LiDAR sampling can be used to obtain estimates of total biomass with an acceptable level of precision (8.1 0.7 [8%] teragrams [total SD]), with sampling error accounting for 58% of the SD of the bootstrap distribution. In addition, we investigated the influence of plot location (i.e., GPS) error, plot size, and field-measured diameter threshold on the variability of the total biomass estimate. We found that using a larger plot (1/30 ha versus 1/59 ha) and a lower diameter threshold (7.6 versus 12.5 cm) significantly reduced the SD of the bootstrap distribution (by approximately 20%), whereas larger plot location error (over a range from 0 to 20 m root mean square error) steadily increased variability at both plot sizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/26.4.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62
摘要
评估了与抽样误差和建模误差相关的变异性比例。结果表明,激光雷达采样可以获得可接受的精度水平(8.1 0.7 [8%]teragrams [total SD])的总生物量估计,采样误差占bootstrap分布SD的58%。此外,我们还研究了样地位置(即GPS)误差、样地大小和实地测量直径阈值对总生物量估计值变异性的影响。我们发现,使用较大的地块(1/30 ha vs 1/59 ha)和较低的直径阈值(7.6 cm vs 12.5 cm)显著降低了自举分布的SD(约20%),而较大的地块位置误差(在0到20 m的均方根误差范围内)稳步增加了两种地块大小的可变性。
Using Airborne Light Detection and Ranging as a Sampling Tool for Estimating Forest Biomass Resources in the Upper Tanana Valley of Interior Alaska
proportion of the variability associated with sampling error and modeling error was assessed. Results indicate that LiDAR sampling can be used to obtain estimates of total biomass with an acceptable level of precision (8.1 0.7 [8%] teragrams [total SD]), with sampling error accounting for 58% of the SD of the bootstrap distribution. In addition, we investigated the influence of plot location (i.e., GPS) error, plot size, and field-measured diameter threshold on the variability of the total biomass estimate. We found that using a larger plot (1/30 ha versus 1/59 ha) and a lower diameter threshold (7.6 versus 12.5 cm) significantly reduced the SD of the bootstrap distribution (by approximately 20%), whereas larger plot location error (over a range from 0 to 20 m root mean square error) steadily increased variability at both plot sizes.