布莱克山保护白杨吸盘免受有蹄类动物侵害的技术评价

Andrew M. Kota, D. Bartos
{"title":"布莱克山保护白杨吸盘免受有蹄类动物侵害的技术评价","authors":"Andrew M. Kota, D. Bartos","doi":"10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive browsing by cattle (Bos taurus L.) and wild ungulates, particularly elk (Cervus elaphus L.), sometimes inhibits growth and maturity of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) suckers in Western North America. In areas where aspen stands are in poor condition or declining, protecting suckers from ungulates may be necessary. This study compared the utility of livestock fences, complete wildlife exclosures, barriers created from slash debris, and tree hinging during 2004 and 2005 in the Black Hills of South Dakota. All of the barriers significantly reduced percentage browsing of aspen suckers compared with the pretreatment average (78%) and posttreatment control (79%). Slash treatments and livestock fences decreased ungulate browsing by 19%, hinge treatments decreased it by 39%, and wildlife fences eliminated nearly all incidences of sucker browsing. The average length removed per terminal stem for aspen suckers decreased from 20.8 to 14.4 cm across all treatments. After 1 year, the mean number of suckers above 100 cm height in both the hinge and slash treatments were significantly greater than both the fence treatments and control. Data showed that autumn and winter browsing was primarily by wild ungulates. Slash barriers can replace livestock fences where cattle affect aspen suckers. Hinge barriers are more useful than both slash barriers and livestock fences in areas where wild ungulates are the primary browsers.","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"25 1","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of techniques to protect aspen suckers from ungulate browsing in the Black Hills\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Kota, D. Bartos\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Excessive browsing by cattle (Bos taurus L.) and wild ungulates, particularly elk (Cervus elaphus L.), sometimes inhibits growth and maturity of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) suckers in Western North America. In areas where aspen stands are in poor condition or declining, protecting suckers from ungulates may be necessary. This study compared the utility of livestock fences, complete wildlife exclosures, barriers created from slash debris, and tree hinging during 2004 and 2005 in the Black Hills of South Dakota. All of the barriers significantly reduced percentage browsing of aspen suckers compared with the pretreatment average (78%) and posttreatment control (79%). Slash treatments and livestock fences decreased ungulate browsing by 19%, hinge treatments decreased it by 39%, and wildlife fences eliminated nearly all incidences of sucker browsing. The average length removed per terminal stem for aspen suckers decreased from 20.8 to 14.4 cm across all treatments. After 1 year, the mean number of suckers above 100 cm height in both the hinge and slash treatments were significantly greater than both the fence treatments and control. Data showed that autumn and winter browsing was primarily by wild ungulates. Slash barriers can replace livestock fences where cattle affect aspen suckers. Hinge barriers are more useful than both slash barriers and livestock fences in areas where wild ungulates are the primary browsers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"161-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/25.4.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

在北美西部,牛(Bos taurus L.)和野生有蹄类动物,特别是麋鹿(Cervus elaphus L.)的过度啃食有时会抑制颤杨(Populus tremuloides Michx.)吸盘木的生长和成熟。在白杨林条件差或衰退的地区,保护吸盘免受有蹄类动物的侵害可能是必要的。这项研究比较了2004年和2005年南达科他州布莱克山的牲畜围栏、完全的野生动物隔离、由切割碎片建造的屏障和树木悬挂的效用。与预处理平均值(78%)和处理后对照(79%)相比,所有屏障都显著降低了白杨吸盘的浏览率。割草处理和牲畜围栏使有蹄类动物的啃食减少了19%,铰链处理使有蹄类动物的啃食减少了39%,野生动物围栏几乎消除了所有吸盘动物的啃食。在所有处理中,每根白杨吸盘的平均去除长度从20.8 cm减少到14.4 cm。1年后,铰链处理和斜线处理的吸盘平均高度在100 cm以上的数量显著高于围栏处理和对照。数据显示,秋季和冬季主要是野生有蹄类动物在觅食。在牛感染白杨吸盘的地方,砍草栅栏可以取代牲畜围栏。在野生有蹄类动物主要觅食的地区,铰链栅栏比斜杠栅栏和牲畜围栏更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of techniques to protect aspen suckers from ungulate browsing in the Black Hills
Excessive browsing by cattle (Bos taurus L.) and wild ungulates, particularly elk (Cervus elaphus L.), sometimes inhibits growth and maturity of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) suckers in Western North America. In areas where aspen stands are in poor condition or declining, protecting suckers from ungulates may be necessary. This study compared the utility of livestock fences, complete wildlife exclosures, barriers created from slash debris, and tree hinging during 2004 and 2005 in the Black Hills of South Dakota. All of the barriers significantly reduced percentage browsing of aspen suckers compared with the pretreatment average (78%) and posttreatment control (79%). Slash treatments and livestock fences decreased ungulate browsing by 19%, hinge treatments decreased it by 39%, and wildlife fences eliminated nearly all incidences of sucker browsing. The average length removed per terminal stem for aspen suckers decreased from 20.8 to 14.4 cm across all treatments. After 1 year, the mean number of suckers above 100 cm height in both the hinge and slash treatments were significantly greater than both the fence treatments and control. Data showed that autumn and winter browsing was primarily by wild ungulates. Slash barriers can replace livestock fences where cattle affect aspen suckers. Hinge barriers are more useful than both slash barriers and livestock fences in areas where wild ungulates are the primary browsers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信