Baniata Kin分类:扩展案例

H. Scheffler
{"title":"Baniata Kin分类:扩展案例","authors":"H. Scheffler","doi":"10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The system of kin classification used by the Baniata-speaking people of Rendova Island, Western British Solomons, is here subjected to structural semantic analysis. The formal semantic model thus derived is discussed and evaluated with reference to numerous claims that other models of the same general sort are invalid for a variety of reasons and that other kinds of models have greater psychological or cognitive validity. The conclusion is that these claims are false and that the alternative models are descriptively inadequate, largely because none of them takes adequate account of the polysemy of the terms in question. The discussion concludes with some observations on the problem of explaining why it is that a particular people employ particular rules of kin-class definition and extension.","PeriodicalId":85570,"journal":{"name":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","volume":"28 1","pages":"350 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baniata Kin Classification: The Case for Extensions\",\"authors\":\"H. Scheffler\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The system of kin classification used by the Baniata-speaking people of Rendova Island, Western British Solomons, is here subjected to structural semantic analysis. The formal semantic model thus derived is discussed and evaluated with reference to numerous claims that other models of the same general sort are invalid for a variety of reasons and that other kinds of models have greater psychological or cognitive validity. The conclusion is that these claims are false and that the alternative models are descriptively inadequate, largely because none of them takes adequate account of the polysemy of the terms in question. The discussion concludes with some observations on the problem of explaining why it is that a particular people employ particular rules of kin-class definition and extension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southwestern journal of anthropology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"350 - 381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southwestern journal of anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

英属西所罗门群岛伦多瓦岛说巴尼亚语的人所使用的亲属分类系统在这里进行了结构语义分析。由此衍生的形式语义模型被讨论和评估,参考了许多主张,即相同一般类型的其他模型由于各种原因无效,其他类型的模型具有更大的心理或认知有效性。结论是,这些说法是错误的,其他模型在描述上是不充分的,主要是因为它们都没有充分考虑到所讨论的术语的多义性。讨论以一些关于解释为什么一个特定的民族使用特定的亲属阶级定义和扩展规则的问题的观察来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Baniata Kin Classification: The Case for Extensions
The system of kin classification used by the Baniata-speaking people of Rendova Island, Western British Solomons, is here subjected to structural semantic analysis. The formal semantic model thus derived is discussed and evaluated with reference to numerous claims that other models of the same general sort are invalid for a variety of reasons and that other kinds of models have greater psychological or cognitive validity. The conclusion is that these claims are false and that the alternative models are descriptively inadequate, largely because none of them takes adequate account of the polysemy of the terms in question. The discussion concludes with some observations on the problem of explaining why it is that a particular people employ particular rules of kin-class definition and extension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信