系统分析和福尔瑟姆-米德兰问题

W. J. Judge
{"title":"系统分析和福尔瑟姆-米德兰问题","authors":"W. J. Judge","doi":"10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the use of systems analysis in the formulation of archeological taxons, with special reference to projectile point types. The latter are viewed as material manifestations of specific cultural subsystem trajectories. To illustrate the concept, hypothetical models of projectile point trajectories are presented, and variation in production techniques defined. The analytic approach is then applied to the practical problem of classifying Folsom and Midland points. Superficial similarity between these point types masks significant technological variations which do exist and are made explicit by the systems approach. It is suggested that differences in the attributes of the original flake blanks best account for variation between the Folsom and Midland trajectories. The hypothesis is offered that the complex Folsom production technique was selected purposely to achieve a more efficient utilization of lithic material.","PeriodicalId":85570,"journal":{"name":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","volume":"40 1","pages":"40 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systems Analysis and the Folsom-Midland Question\",\"authors\":\"W. J. Judge\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the use of systems analysis in the formulation of archeological taxons, with special reference to projectile point types. The latter are viewed as material manifestations of specific cultural subsystem trajectories. To illustrate the concept, hypothetical models of projectile point trajectories are presented, and variation in production techniques defined. The analytic approach is then applied to the practical problem of classifying Folsom and Midland points. Superficial similarity between these point types masks significant technological variations which do exist and are made explicit by the systems approach. It is suggested that differences in the attributes of the original flake blanks best account for variation between the Folsom and Midland trajectories. The hypothesis is offered that the complex Folsom production technique was selected purposely to achieve a more efficient utilization of lithic material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southwestern journal of anthropology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southwestern journal of anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.26.1.3629269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

本文讨论了系统分析在制定考古分类单元中的应用,特别提到了抛射点类型。后者被视为特定文化子系统轨迹的物质表现。为了说明这一概念,提出了弹丸点轨迹的假设模型,并定义了生产技术的变化。然后将分析方法应用于Folsom点和Midland点分类的实际问题。这些点类型之间的表面相似性掩盖了确实存在的重大技术差异,并通过系统方法明确表示。有人认为,原始薄片坯的属性差异最好地解释了福尔索姆和米德兰轨迹之间的差异。提出了一种假设,即有目的地选择复杂的Folsom生产技术,以实现对锂材料的更有效利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systems Analysis and the Folsom-Midland Question
This paper discusses the use of systems analysis in the formulation of archeological taxons, with special reference to projectile point types. The latter are viewed as material manifestations of specific cultural subsystem trajectories. To illustrate the concept, hypothetical models of projectile point trajectories are presented, and variation in production techniques defined. The analytic approach is then applied to the practical problem of classifying Folsom and Midland points. Superficial similarity between these point types masks significant technological variations which do exist and are made explicit by the systems approach. It is suggested that differences in the attributes of the original flake blanks best account for variation between the Folsom and Midland trajectories. The hypothesis is offered that the complex Folsom production technique was selected purposely to achieve a more efficient utilization of lithic material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信