给邓特利、沙克尔福德和小特尔的回信

Social biology Pub Date : 2004-09-01 DOI:10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094

L. Ellis

{"title":"给邓特利、沙克尔福德和小特尔的回信","authors":"L. Ellis","doi":"10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am grateful to Drs. Tittle, Duntley, and Shackelford for their comments and I will make my responses to their ideas brief. Let me begin by reiterating three major themes contained in the target article. First, an inverse relationship between serious persistent victimful forms of criminality and social status is now well established (especially regarding individual, as opposed to parental, social status), and needs to be theoretically explained","PeriodicalId":76544,"journal":{"name":"Social biology","volume":"51 1","pages":"171 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reply to Duntley, Shackelford, and Tittle\",\"authors\":\"L. Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am grateful to Drs. Tittle, Duntley, and Shackelford for their comments and I will make my responses to their ideas brief. Let me begin by reiterating three major themes contained in the target article. First, an inverse relationship between serious persistent victimful forms of criminality and social status is now well established (especially regarding individual, as opposed to parental, social status), and needs to be theoretically explained\",\"PeriodicalId\":76544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social biology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2004.9989094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我很感激dr。little, Duntley和Shackelford的评论，我将简短地回应他们的观点。让我首先重申目标文章中包含的三个主要主题。首先，严重的、持续的、伤害性的犯罪形式与社会地位之间的反比关系现在已经得到了很好的确立(尤其是在个人方面，而不是父母的社会地位方面)，需要从理论上加以解释

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A reply to Duntley, Shackelford, and Tittle

I am grateful to Drs. Tittle, Duntley, and Shackelford for their comments and I will make my responses to their ideas brief. Let me begin by reiterating three major themes contained in the target article. First, an inverse relationship between serious persistent victimful forms of criminality and social status is now well established (especially regarding individual, as opposed to parental, social status), and needs to be theoretically explained

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social biology

自引率

0.00%

发文量