消费实证研究中中小学教师概念能力的提升

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qijie Cai, Huili Hong
{"title":"消费实证研究中中小学教师概念能力的提升","authors":"Qijie Cai, Huili Hong","doi":"10.1080/13664530.2022.2160803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research competencies can empower teachers to inquire into their work and innovate in the field. In particular, conceptual competencies in consuming empirical research (CCER) are expected of K–12 teachers, but little is known about how teachers develop CCER. To address this gap, the authors conducted a case study with 12 teachers enrolled in a hybrid graduate course on educational research at a public, comprehensive university in the USA. Data generated from the 15-week course activities and assignments were analyzed. Findings show that teachers’ CCER improved through a three-stage process. In each stage, teachers achieved success but encountered challenges. The varied performance among teachers could be explained by three factors: extensiveness of literature review, conceptual understanding of research topic, and specificity of research focus. This study contributes to the literature by generating detailed evidence of how K–12 teachers develop CCER. Implications for course design and future studies are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46208,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving K-12 teachers’ conceptual competencies in consuming empirical research\",\"authors\":\"Qijie Cai, Huili Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13664530.2022.2160803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Research competencies can empower teachers to inquire into their work and innovate in the field. In particular, conceptual competencies in consuming empirical research (CCER) are expected of K–12 teachers, but little is known about how teachers develop CCER. To address this gap, the authors conducted a case study with 12 teachers enrolled in a hybrid graduate course on educational research at a public, comprehensive university in the USA. Data generated from the 15-week course activities and assignments were analyzed. Findings show that teachers’ CCER improved through a three-stage process. In each stage, teachers achieved success but encountered challenges. The varied performance among teachers could be explained by three factors: extensiveness of literature review, conceptual understanding of research topic, and specificity of research focus. This study contributes to the literature by generating detailed evidence of how K–12 teachers develop CCER. Implications for course design and future studies are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teacher Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teacher Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2160803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2160803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究能力可以使教师探究自己的工作并在该领域进行创新。特别是对K-12教师的消费实证研究概念能力(CCER)的期望,但对教师如何发展CCER知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,作者对美国一所公立综合性大学的12名参加教育研究混合研究生课程的教师进行了案例研究。分析了15周课程活动和作业产生的数据。研究结果表明,教师CCER的提高经历了三个阶段。在每个阶段,教师都取得了成功,但也遇到了挑战。教师的不同表现可以用三个因素来解释:文献综述的广泛性、对研究主题的概念性理解和研究重点的特殊性。本研究通过提供K-12教师如何发展CCER的详细证据,为文献做出了贡献。讨论了对课程设计和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving K-12 teachers’ conceptual competencies in consuming empirical research
ABSTRACT Research competencies can empower teachers to inquire into their work and innovate in the field. In particular, conceptual competencies in consuming empirical research (CCER) are expected of K–12 teachers, but little is known about how teachers develop CCER. To address this gap, the authors conducted a case study with 12 teachers enrolled in a hybrid graduate course on educational research at a public, comprehensive university in the USA. Data generated from the 15-week course activities and assignments were analyzed. Findings show that teachers’ CCER improved through a three-stage process. In each stage, teachers achieved success but encountered challenges. The varied performance among teachers could be explained by three factors: extensiveness of literature review, conceptual understanding of research topic, and specificity of research focus. This study contributes to the literature by generating detailed evidence of how K–12 teachers develop CCER. Implications for course design and future studies are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Development
Teacher Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Teacher Development is a fully refereed international journal publishing articles on all aspects of teachers" professional development. It acts as a forum for critical and reflective attention to practice in teacher development and aims thereby to contribute to the quality of professional development. The journal takes a "whole-career" view of teacher development, and work from both international and inter-professional perspectives is welcome. Articles may deal with teacher development in varying political and professional contexts, and may be in a variety of styles, in keeping with the diversity of activity in professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信