中欧和东欧的生产力集聚和增长

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
M. Niţoi, M. Pochea
{"title":"中欧和东欧的生产力集聚和增长","authors":"M. Niţoi, M. Pochea","doi":"10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses a non-linear time-varying model to test productivity convergence in 10 emerging countries within Central and Eastern Europe. The results show that the convergence algorithm has rejected the null hypothesis of convergence for all countries in most of the sectors. Also, we found evidence that the productivity clusters for total economy and other sectors are very different in terms of number and countries. Additionally, even if the productivity gaps in the region have been reduced, we still notice significant disparities between countries. The clustering algorithm shows countries which have a high productivity growth in some sectors and a low productivity growth in others. This reveals the prevalence of idiosyncratic factors in productivity determinants. Baltic countries are catching up, while other countries such as Bulgaria are underperformers.","PeriodicalId":43756,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economics","volume":"16 1","pages":"132 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity clustering and growth in Central and Eastern Europe\",\"authors\":\"M. Niţoi, M. Pochea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article uses a non-linear time-varying model to test productivity convergence in 10 emerging countries within Central and Eastern Europe. The results show that the convergence algorithm has rejected the null hypothesis of convergence for all countries in most of the sectors. Also, we found evidence that the productivity clusters for total economy and other sectors are very different in terms of number and countries. Additionally, even if the productivity gaps in the region have been reduced, we still notice significant disparities between countries. The clustering algorithm shows countries which have a high productivity growth in some sectors and a low productivity growth in others. This reveals the prevalence of idiosyncratic factors in productivity determinants. Baltic countries are catching up, while other countries such as Bulgaria are underperformers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2016.1189267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文采用一个非线性时变模型来检验中东欧10个新兴国家的生产率收敛性。结果表明,在大多数行业中,收敛算法拒绝了所有国家收敛的零假设。此外,我们发现证据表明,整体经济和其他部门的生产力集群在数量和国家方面存在很大差异。此外,即使该地区的生产力差距已经缩小,我们仍然注意到各国之间的巨大差距。聚类算法显示了在某些部门生产率增长高而在其他部门生产率增长低的国家。这揭示了生产率决定因素中普遍存在的特殊因素。波罗的海国家正在迎头赶上,而保加利亚等其他国家则表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity clustering and growth in Central and Eastern Europe
ABSTRACT This article uses a non-linear time-varying model to test productivity convergence in 10 emerging countries within Central and Eastern Europe. The results show that the convergence algorithm has rejected the null hypothesis of convergence for all countries in most of the sectors. Also, we found evidence that the productivity clusters for total economy and other sectors are very different in terms of number and countries. Additionally, even if the productivity gaps in the region have been reduced, we still notice significant disparities between countries. The clustering algorithm shows countries which have a high productivity growth in some sectors and a low productivity growth in others. This reveals the prevalence of idiosyncratic factors in productivity determinants. Baltic countries are catching up, while other countries such as Bulgaria are underperformers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信