艺术与工艺的解放:海德格尔技术与艺术对话的艺术回应

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Susanna Lindberg
{"title":"艺术与工艺的解放:海德格尔技术与艺术对话的艺术回应","authors":"Susanna Lindberg","doi":"10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is motivated by Heidegger’s invitation to think the essence of technics through a dialogue between technics and art. This dialogue is approached with the help of several artworks belonging to what can be called the “technological turn” in art. First, I draw a schematic picture of notions of instrumentality, rationality, totality, and teleology inherited from classical philosophy of art and technology and challenged by contemporary art. I underline the Romantic claim that art overcomes these features thanks to its freedom and ask, referring to the work of Gilbert Simondon, whether technology could also be liberated from its subordination to utilitarian ends. Second, I look at how certain contemporary works of art attempt to solve some of these problems. Artists who seize technical objects generally seek to make their functioning visible and problematic by distorting, interrupting, or otherwise modifying the technical dispositif—this is when a machine becomes a work of art. I show how this happens in certain works of Rebecca Horn, Jean Tinguely, Anaïs Tondeur, Eduardo Kac, and Tomas Saraceno. In conclusion, I show how art can liberate technology by liberating it from utility and instrumentality and by exposing it as such in its functioning. On the other hand, I argue that technology can liberate art, both through artistic techniques and nonartistic technological processes.","PeriodicalId":41067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","volume":"4 1","pages":"139 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberation—of Art and Technics: Artistic Responses to Heidegger’s Call for a Dialogue between Technics and Art\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Lindberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper is motivated by Heidegger’s invitation to think the essence of technics through a dialogue between technics and art. This dialogue is approached with the help of several artworks belonging to what can be called the “technological turn” in art. First, I draw a schematic picture of notions of instrumentality, rationality, totality, and teleology inherited from classical philosophy of art and technology and challenged by contemporary art. I underline the Romantic claim that art overcomes these features thanks to its freedom and ask, referring to the work of Gilbert Simondon, whether technology could also be liberated from its subordination to utilitarian ends. Second, I look at how certain contemporary works of art attempt to solve some of these problems. Artists who seize technical objects generally seek to make their functioning visible and problematic by distorting, interrupting, or otherwise modifying the technical dispositif—this is when a machine becomes a work of art. I show how this happens in certain works of Rebecca Horn, Jean Tinguely, Anaïs Tondeur, Eduardo Kac, and Tomas Saraceno. In conclusion, I show how art can liberate technology by liberating it from utility and instrumentality and by exposing it as such in its functioning. On the other hand, I argue that technology can liberate art, both through artistic techniques and nonartistic technological processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

海德格尔邀请我们通过技术与艺术的对话来思考技术的本质,这是本文的出发点。这种对话是在几件艺术作品的帮助下进行的,这些作品属于艺术中所谓的“技术转向”。首先,我描绘了一幅从古典艺术和技术哲学中继承并受到当代艺术挑战的工具性、理性、整体性和目的论概念的概要图。我强调浪漫主义的主张,即艺术由于其自由而克服了这些特征,并参考吉尔伯特·西蒙顿(Gilbert Simondon)的作品,询问技术是否也可以从功利目的的从属地位中解放出来。其次,我考察了某些当代艺术作品是如何试图解决这些问题的。抓住技术对象的艺术家通常试图通过扭曲、中断或以其他方式修改技术配置来使其功能可见和有问题——这就是机器成为艺术品的时候。我在Rebecca Horn, Jean Tinguely, Anaïs Tondeur, Eduardo Kac和Tomas Saraceno的某些作品中展示了这种情况是如何发生的。总之,我展示了艺术如何通过将技术从实用性和工具性中解放出来,并在其功能中暴露出来,从而解放技术。另一方面,我认为技术可以通过艺术技巧和非艺术技术过程解放艺术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberation—of Art and Technics: Artistic Responses to Heidegger’s Call for a Dialogue between Technics and Art
Abstract This paper is motivated by Heidegger’s invitation to think the essence of technics through a dialogue between technics and art. This dialogue is approached with the help of several artworks belonging to what can be called the “technological turn” in art. First, I draw a schematic picture of notions of instrumentality, rationality, totality, and teleology inherited from classical philosophy of art and technology and challenged by contemporary art. I underline the Romantic claim that art overcomes these features thanks to its freedom and ask, referring to the work of Gilbert Simondon, whether technology could also be liberated from its subordination to utilitarian ends. Second, I look at how certain contemporary works of art attempt to solve some of these problems. Artists who seize technical objects generally seek to make their functioning visible and problematic by distorting, interrupting, or otherwise modifying the technical dispositif—this is when a machine becomes a work of art. I show how this happens in certain works of Rebecca Horn, Jean Tinguely, Anaïs Tondeur, Eduardo Kac, and Tomas Saraceno. In conclusion, I show how art can liberate technology by liberating it from utility and instrumentality and by exposing it as such in its functioning. On the other hand, I argue that technology can liberate art, both through artistic techniques and nonartistic technological processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信